It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
If one owns the media, and one owns a number of drone aircraft, and if one owns the security companies that guard the buildings, it would be very easy to plan and execute such a false flag.
Airframe Record of United 175
N612UA has Reserved/Multiple Records
Data Updated each Federal Working Day at Midnight
Print This Page Goto New Search Page
Type Reservation Fee Paid
Mode S Code 51773757
Reserved Date 01/13/2015
Renewal Date None
Purge Date 02/13/2016
Pending Number Change None
Date Change Authorized None
Reserving Party Name TAYLOR BRUCE
Street 7126 CHELSEA DR NE
City CEDAR RAPIDS
Zip Code 52402-1471
Country UNITED STATES
Deregistered Aircraft 1 of 1
Serial Number 21873 Certificate Issue Date 01/18/1984
Manufacturer Name BOEING Mode S Code (base 8 / oct) 51773757
Model 767-222 Mode S Code (base 16 / hex) A7F7EF
Year Manufacturer 1983 Cancel Date 09/28/2005
Reason for Cancellation Cancelled Export To None
Type Registration Corporation
Aircraft Registration prior to Deregistration
Name UNITED AIR LINES INC
Street BOX 66100
State ILLINOIS Zip Code 60666
Country UNITED STATES
Engine Manufacturer P & W Classification Standard
Engine Model 52054 Category Transport
A/W Date 02/15/1995
originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: Salander
It is peculiar that you would say such a thing in the absence of evidence, especially when countries around the world issued warnings to the United States that Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda would use hijacked aircraft as missiles in their attack.
After the 9/11 attack, Osama bin Laden admitted he was responsible, and afterward, al-Qaeda released martyr videos of the 9/11 hijackers.
Pretty simple. If you believe the official explanation then move on with life secure in this truth. If not keep working to piece together what really happened and if the work is good enough then maybe it becomes the new truth.
Maybe the truth is a mixture of the two. I will say the government is not exactly known as a beacon for truth and openness and any questions and accusations is because of their own actions.
Nobody can "prove" the official story, here at ATS or anywhere else including the 911 Commission report.
The official story is false, there some alternative explanation must be valid.
With all due respect sir, you are not in touch with reality as to what happened and did not happen on 911.
Your claims are taken as seriously as claims by Rumsfeld or Powell or Cheney or Bush.
That is, they are not taken seriously because they have been shown many times to be inaccurate and false. The official story is a magnificent deception.
The Structural Engineering Community Rejects the Controlled-Demolition Conspiracy Theory
he structural engineering community rejects the controlled-demolition conspiracy theory. Its consensus is that the collapse of the World Trade Center buildings was a fire-induced, gravity-driven collapse, an explanation that does not involve the use of explosives.
The World Trade Center's Steel Structure Was Buckling Before the Collapsee
Police, Firemen and Civilians Saw Warning Signs of Collapse of the Twin Towers on September 11th 2001
WTC Pre-Collapse Bowing Debunks 9/11 "Controlled Demolition" Theory
Indications of the Imminent Collapse of the World Trade Center Buildings Disprove Explosives Theory
"The NYPD aviation unit reported critical information about the impending collapse of the buildings." They could see that the exterior steel beams of the buildings were bowing. You can see the inward bowing of the steel columns in pictures of both WTC 2, (the first building to collapse) and WTC 1 (the second building to collapse.)
Did experts on the scene think WTC 7 was a controlled demolition?
We have spoken with several who possess extensive experience in explosive demolition, and all reported seeing or hearing nothing to indicate an explosive detonation precipitating the collapse..."We were all standing around helpless...we knew full well it was going to collapse. Everyone there knew. You gotta remember there was a lot of confusion and we didn't know if another plane was coming...but I never heard explosions like demo charges.
Towers Weakened by Planes; Brought Down by Fire
Analysis by a team of 25 of the nation's leading structural and fire protection engineers suggests that the World Trade Center Towers could have remained standing indefinitely if fire had not overwhelmed the weakened structures, according to a report presented today at a hearing of the House Science Committee.
Why the World Trade Center Buildings Collapsed: A Fire Chief ’s Assessment
The jet collapsed the ceilings and scraped most of the spray-on fire retarding asbestos from the steel trusses. The steel truss floor supports probably started to fail quickly from the flames and the center steel supporting columns severed by plane parts heated by the flames began to buckle, sag, warp and fail. Then the top part of the tower crashed down on the lower portion of the structure. This pancake collapse triggered the entire cascading collapse of the 110-story structure.
Civil & Structural Engineers on WTC Collapse
The heat from an ordinary office fire would suffice to soften and weaken the unprotected steel. Evaluation of the effects of the fire on the core column structure, with the insulation removed by the impact, showed that collapse would follow whatever the number of columns cut at the time of the impact."
Brent Blanchard: Top Demolition Expert
Undicisettembre: Talking about the three collapses that occurred on 9/11, are conspiracy theories that claim they were controlled demolitions even vaguely reliable?
Brent Blanchard: No. There's no evidence. We see the same material being presented year after year, over and over. We are not judge and jury but we do work in the industry and we see it all the time. We do see telltale signs of what to look for, we did work on the cleanup, I was personally on the 9/11 site later in the fall because we were documenting the clean-up effort by multiple demolition crews.
My engineering company is not tied to any political organization, we are not even tied to those demolition teams. We are just a contractor, and that was one of our jobs. We have a trained eye and none of us saw any indication of wiring, or cuts, or pre burning or any of the things we see hundreds of times a year on explosive demolition sites.
Given the amount of time we worked there, if we had seen some of it we would have taken note of it. We would have seen if something didn't look right. Not only my team, but all demolition teams….not a single man saw anything that looked suspicious or that looked like it needed further investigation related to explosive demolition.
This all came from conspiracy theorists who are not expert in controlled demolitions at all.
I do not need to prove you wrong sir, you need to prove yourself right.
There are reasons for that. The story is false, a hoax. We were all deceived, and some folks have still not figured that out, 14 years on.