It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
WTC Nuke Hoax
The Duff - Khalezov kaput view of conspiracies
According to Dimitri Khalezov and Gordon Duff, 150 kTon thermonuclear "demolition devices" were installed beneath the Towers when they were built, the Nixon administration was in on it and managed to cover it up until Khalezov "exposed" it 35 years later, the choice of 150 kTon - which must have been settled before December 1972 when the North Tower was completed - was determined by the Peaceful Nuclear Explosions Treaty for which negotiations began in Moscow on October 7, 1974 and were concluded in April 1976 with the Treaty becoming legally enforceable on December 11, 1990, Rudy Giuliani and the New York authorities were tricked by the 9/11 perpetrators into detonating three 150 kTon thermonuclear devices in Manhattan in an attempt to prevent potential devastation to the City of New York from suspected nuclear warheads that might or might not have existed on crashed planes that in reality had been "faked" and were lying a quarter of a mile above two of those alleged 150 kTon devices, after a "missile" with a "nuclear" warhead was fired into the Pentagon...
And if they had they probably would be able to pull off a survivable landing by the use of automatics, as all planes used 9/11 were CATIIIB capable.
I was not thinking of removal of any EVIDENCE regarding a nuclear event, but rather removal or destruction of any REPORTS regarding that. IOW, the detection of signs of nuclear event may or may not have happened, but I wonder about the official, at higher levels, suppression or even destruction of any records about that.
Debunking the WTC was Nuked Claim
* No nuclear flash generated during the collapse of the WTC buildings
* No nuclear fallout from the collapse of the WTC buildings
* No radiation at ground zero that can be attributed to a nuclear bomb
* No EMP, which is evident by the fact that computers, vehicles, and even video cameras continued to operate normally AS the WTC buildings collapsed.
* No shock wave attributed to a nuclear detonation
* No radioactive residue attributed to a nuclear detonation
* No evidence of a nuclear detonation in the rubble
* The fact that cleanup crews were not properly dressed to work in a nuclear-contaminated site, proves that there was no nuclear detonation in New York City.
* No seismic data generated for a nuclear explosion, much less from 3 nukes.
* No mushroom clouds generated from a nuclear explosion in New York City
* No evidence that the WTC steel was subject to temperatures anywhere near the melting point of steel much less explosed to temperatures of millions of degrees that's normally generated during a nuclear detonation.
The nuclear theory is the only complete one. The only one to explain ALL the observed damage and events.
Steven Jones on the WTC Nuke Hoax
Observation of tritium (an important component of hydrogen-bomb fuel) at WTC sites at the few nano-curie level only. This is strong evidence against the mini-nuke hypothesis.
The fact that radioactive iodine concentrations were actually lower in the upper/WTC debris-filled layers.
Radioactive hot-spots in NYC were found to be due to radium, which is traceable to industrial uses (not bombs). This in itself does not rule out mini-nukes, but these data certainly do not support the mini-nuke hypothesis.
Lioy et al. report that radioactivity from thorium, uranium, actinium series and other radionuclides is at or near the background level for WTC dust.
Nuclear activation or residual "fall-out" radioactivity (above background) was NOT observed, in tests performed by the author on actual WTC samples. This result is consistent with the low Iodine-131 measured by independent researchers (point 2 above) and the low radionuclide counts (point 4 above) and again provides compelling evidence against the mini-nuke-at-Towers hypothesis.
No fatalities due to radiation "burning" were reported near ground zero. William Rodriguez survived the North Tower collapse.
No observed melting of glass due to the collapse-process of the Towers.
One more: The mini-nuke idea fails completely for WTC 7 where vertically-directed plumes of dust were absent during the collapse, and the building fell quite neatly onto its own footprint. (Molten metal was observed under the WTC7 rubble as well.)
Gordon Duff of Veterans Today Admits To Writing 40% False Information
Gordon Duff of Veterans Today in his own words. He admits To Writing 40% False Information and that at least 30% of the information on Veterans Today is false as well.
, Jeff Prager is the author, the FEMA photos are amazing and the footnotes are copious. I think the actual title is something like "911: America Nuked" Though difficult, it is most informative regarding nuclear processes.
VETERANS TODAY IS DISINFO & JEFF PRAGER
Veterans Today used to be a great source for information but over the last several years, they have really changed their position on 9/11 and now many suspect them of infiltration and deliberately spreading disinformation into the movement. Founder Gordon Duff and others like James Fetzer, Dmitri Khalezov, Donald Fox, and Jeff Prager are just a few editors at Veterans Today that strongly support that “Mini Nukes” brought down the towers after the “Holograms” hit them.
Veterans Today are strongly against the 2300+ Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth and do not agree with the theory of controlled demolition theory via Nano Thermite and Explosives. Which has been scientifically proven and is the general consensus within the Truth Movement.
In 2011, Jeff Prager started promoting the underground nuke (Khalezov) theory. When that theory was refuted Prager jumped on board with the Duff, Fetzer and Fox and changed his theory to the mini-nukes. In his own words, Jeff Prager promotes the WTC No Plane theory and spreads hates towards Steven Jones and AE911, calling them “frauds”.
Gordon Duff (Senior Editor at VT) has publicly admitted that 40% of everything he publishes on Veterans Today is “patently false”. My question is how can people still consider VT to be a credible source when the founder himself admits to spreading false information? Ever since James Fetzer joined VT, it has gone to the #s and my new slogan for Veterans Today is “Mini Nukes and Jews”.