It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Outrageo
1. No, we went all right -it was NOT 'faked'. In fact, I think a case can be made that there were (and may still be) OTHER, additional 'missions' of which we know nothing. Russians and Chinese may be complicit in this - partially in collaboration, partially to satisfy their own agendas.
2. Yes, we not only were there, but we, the unwashed masses, were given only the sanitized, 'politically/culturally corrected' version. The highlights were genuinely filmed on the moon as we saw them, but there was much more that we have not been shown, and are unlikely to ever see.
3. I'm choking on my own vomit. NOTHING is ever 'exactly' as NASA says. Their annual 'public-consumption-scrubbing budget' is more money than all of us on ATS together will see in our combined lifetimes.
e.g. - Nothing to hide? Someone at NASA is definitely doctoring images before they are released - why?:
originally posted by: johnb
Just wondering how many fall in each camp or being ATS probably some other options
1. It was filmed in Area 51 /faked
2. We did go and met/saw/were warned off by something/beings or discovered structures already there...
3. It all went down exactly as NASA et all said
--------------------
I reckon currently I am leaning more to option 2
Option 1 - I would possibly believe if someone can give a good reason why the former USSR or China didn't call it at the time.
Option 3 - When do the govt and their agencies ever give all the information they have on anything without spinning it?
originally posted by: Outrageo
e.g. - Nothing to hide? Someone at NASA is definitely doctoring images before they are released - why?:
originally posted by: Outrageo
originally posted by: onebigmonkey
The interpretation is dishonest. The first picture on the left is at the lunar module, or near enough, while the one on the right is taken from 2 km away at Station 9, by Hadley Rille.
originally posted by: NONPOINT21
a reply to: 3danimator2014
You can't find 1 picture form space of Earth that isn't from the apollo 17 mission that isn't a composite or artist rendering. You are brainwashed and blind. If you don't think that is worrisome that NASA or any other country can't produce 1 real picture of earth from space then you are in your own bubble.
You cannot find any picture of earth from space...they pic they just released because so many people are asking questions was admitted by nasa to be yet another composite of 3 satellites.
originally posted by: NONPOINT21
a reply to: 3danimator2014
You can't find 1 picture form space of Earth that isn't from the apollo 17 mission that isn't a composite or artist rendering. You are brainwashed and blind. If you don't think that is worrisome that NASA or any other country can't produce 1 real picture of earth from space then you are in your own bubble.
I guess Russia just said hey the Americans went 6 times in 4 years we don't need to go...or let's never go back with new technology...the 60's tech we had was good enough for us...or how about no woman has ever been to the moon...don't you think it would be great to have a new mission to the moon for the first woman to set foot????
You cannot find any picture of earth from space...they pic they just released because so many people are asking questions was admitted by nasa to be yet another composite of 3 satellites.
Watch the NASA channel and prepare to be amazed by the amount of truth they tell you. But no your research is iron clad lol.
originally posted by: NONPOINT21
a reply to: 3danimator2014
You can't find 1 picture form space of Earth that isn't from the apollo 17 mission that isn't a composite or artist rendering. You are brainwashed and blind. If you don't think that is worrisome that NASA or any other country can't produce 1 real picture of earth from space then you are in your own bubble.
originally posted by: NONPOINT21
a reply to: 3danimator2014
You can't find 1 picture form space of Earth that isn't from the apollo 17 mission that isn't a composite or artist rendering. You are brainwashed and blind. If you don't think that is worrisome that NASA or any other country can't produce 1 real picture of earth from space then you are in your own bubble.
I guess Russia just said hey the Americans went 6 times in 4 years we don't need to go...or let's never go back with new technology...the 60's tech we had was good enough for us...or how about no woman has ever been to the moon...don't you think it would be great to have a new mission to the moon for the first woman to set foot????
You cannot find any picture of earth from space...they pic they just released because so many people are asking questions was admitted by nasa to be yet another composite of 3 satellites.
Watch the NASA channel and prepare to be amazed by the amount of truth they tell you. But no your research is iron clad lol.
originally posted by: onebigmonkey
originally posted by: NONPOINT21
a reply to: 3danimator2014
You can't find 1 picture form space of Earth that isn't from the apollo 17 mission that isn't a composite or artist rendering. You are brainwashed and blind. If you don't think that is worrisome that NASA or any other country can't produce 1 real picture of earth from space then you are in your own bubble.
I guess Russia just said hey the Americans went 6 times in 4 years we don't need to go...or let's never go back with new technology...the 60's tech we had was good enough for us...or how about no woman has ever been to the moon...don't you think it would be great to have a new mission to the moon for the first woman to set foot????
You cannot find any picture of earth from space...they pic they just released because so many people are asking questions was admitted by nasa to be yet another composite of 3 satellites.
Watch the NASA channel and prepare to be amazed by the amount of truth they tell you. But no your research is iron clad lol.
Oh really...
originally posted by: onebigmonkey
And this fabulous sequence from the DSCO:
www.nasa.gov...