It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TzarChasm
a reply to: Annee
On a somewhat lighter note, it amuses me how much "ATS" sounds like "atheists".
...CONSPIRACY!!! Lol
originally posted by: Annee
I question why you are in this thread if your only claim is that the Creator exits ---- that he always has.
Saying something has always existed means nothing in a debate specific to proof.
originally posted by: 5StarOracle
Ok so I have read some things and if nobody here can prove God does not exist...
Well then they lose...
originally posted by: 5StarOracle
Ok so I have read some things and if nobody here can prove God does not exist...
Well then they lose...
Argument from ignorance (Latin: argumentum ad ignorantiam), also known as appeal to ignorance (in which ignorance stands for "lack of evidence to the contrary"), is a fallacy in informal logic. It asserts that a proposition is true because it has not yet been proven false (or vice versa). This represents a type of false dichotomy in that it excludes a third option, which is that there is insufficient investigation and therefore insufficient information to prove the proposition satisfactorily to be either true or false. Nor does it allow the admission that the choices may in fact not be two (true or false), but may be as many as four,
1.true
2.false
3.unknown between true or false
4.being unknowable (among the first three).[1]
In debates, appeals to ignorance are sometimes used in an attempt to shift the burden of proof.
originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: 5StarOracle
You really think that is a personal attack?
You seem to be under the impression that just because you claim something then it will make it so. You do that with a lot of things in this thread.
Chess with pigeons go ahead and google it.
You are getting desperate. You've made that argument in the past and it was debunked. It doesn't do anything to prove god, so your post is off topic. Gender did not have to evolve in perfect synchronization. Why would you use this argument when you used it as the premise of a thread already and it got destroyed?
originally posted by: 5StarOracle
Ok so I have read some things and if nobody here can prove God does not exist...
Well then they lose...
originally posted by: 5StarOracle
a reply to: Grimpachi
I'm not a pigeon...
originally posted by: Blue_Jay33
a reply to: TheChrome
Not only that every evolving animal had to undergo gender evolution from asexual to sexual, in perfect synchronization, so it's species wouldn't die out. And then one day they just copulate, something they had never done before, they had no instinct to do it, but did it anyway. And what happened while the sex organs were evolving over thousands of years ?
Thanks for bringing some higher intelligence in for the other side of this discussion, why should the one side get a free for all pile on against creation.
originally posted by: 5StarOracle
. . . atheist means more intelligent and of course always right...