It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Why I believe the Moon landings may have been faked

page: 40
57
<< 37  38  39    41  42  43 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 23 2016 @ 09:49 AM
link   

originally posted by: turbonium1

They will not speak about it, ever. Their livelihood depends on NASA, and the sad truth cannot be revealed


what livelihood??

you think all NASA engineers drive in their Maybach's sipping on their morning Don Perignon on their way to their private jet to take them to work?

or are you insinuating that it is impossible for a NASA employed engineer to change jobs because their skills are completely useless in the big bad world.. even a change to unrelated fields is completely unfathomable..




posted on Jan, 23 2016 @ 09:58 AM
link   
a reply to: lavatrance

as you ignored the reply to a near identical claim in the last thread - i shall use the same rebuttal here :

oh dear - if you are going to quote figures - please cite them

heres mine :



Apollo spacecraft: $7,945.0 million
Saturn I launch vehicles: $767.1 million
Saturn IB launch vehicles: $1,131.2 million
Saturn V launch vehicles: $6,871.1 million
Launch vehicle engine development: $854.2 million
Mission support: $1,432.3 million
Tracking and data acquisition: $664.1 million
Ground facilities: $1,830.3 million
Operation of installations: $2,420.6 million.
The final cost of Apollo was reported to Congress as $25.4 billion in 1972


source

PS - i ave only used wiki - as it gives one easy soundbyte - please follow all the wiki refrernces for primary // secondary sources if you dispute anything in the quote

now for the crunch - where EXACTLY would an alledged hoax save money ?

come on - lets have it



posted on Jan, 23 2016 @ 10:01 AM
link   
amazing revalation - that will come as shocking news to apollo hoax believers :

real people doing real activities move at different speeds during different phases of activity

the above ^ is fooking blisteringly obvious to any one that can think

but hey hoax believers ...................................



posted on Jan, 23 2016 @ 08:56 PM
link   


where EXACTLY would an alledged hoax "save" money


once again the piltdown apollo pundits fail to see the bigger picture ...

edit on 23-1-2016 by Misinformation because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 23 2016 @ 08:59 PM
link   
a reply to: Misinformation

translation :

i have no answer to the topic - so i am going to move the goal poasts and go off on a bratcrap tangent



posted on Jan, 24 2016 @ 02:14 AM
link   


it proves nothing


A plethora of viable evidence presented shows conclusively that the relative velocity compositions are essentially in agreement with the projected postulated hypothesis..., it is incomprehensible how the apollopiths can formulate the contrary based upon tertiary hypotheticals , to do so will serve no other purpose but to undermine their credibility ...



posted on Jan, 24 2016 @ 09:34 AM
link   

originally posted by: Misinformation



it proves nothing


A plethora of viable evidence presented shows conclusively that the relative velocity compositions are essentially in agreement with the projected postulated hypothesis...,



no it doesnt..

the "projected postulated hypothesis" was that Apollo 11 was filmed using 50% speed for whatever reason.
this 20 second selection which ignores 99.77% of the footage is supposed to be used as be all end all evidence that Apollo 11 was at half speed.

so no it doesnt show anything conclusive at all.. this "hypothesis" has fallen on its face before it could take its first step, it takes a great amount of ignorance to attempt to drag it around and force it down the "oh that might make sense" section.



posted on Jan, 24 2016 @ 11:25 AM
link   


where EXACTLY would an alledged hoax "save" money


Well if they came out and admitted that they couldn't actually send anyone to the moon don't you think their funding would have been cut dramatically?



posted on Jan, 24 2016 @ 12:35 PM
link   
a reply to: CB328

utter bollox - please actually address what is being argued



posted on Jan, 24 2016 @ 03:52 PM
link   
Russian operative employs cryptic language threatening to blow the whistle & expose the moon landing hoax

"The moon will become part of the Earth"


“You know, it’s more likely that the moon will become part of the Earth, than that I will be extradited from Russia - it’s just impossible.


Radiation Investigation




posted on Jan, 24 2016 @ 04:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: Misinformation
Russian operative employs cryptic language threatening to blow the whistle & expose the moon landing hoax

"The moon will become part of the Earth"


“You know, it’s more likely that the moon will become part of the Earth, than that I will be extradited from Russia - it’s just impossible.


Radiation Investigation




This is actually quite funny.

Your first link from mirror.co.uk says

One of the Alexander Litvinenko ‘killers’ bragged there is more chance “the moon will become part of the Earth” than him facing justice in Britain.


I don't see how that can be a cryptic message at all. Just as people say "and pigs might fly", we don't see anything to do with pigs/bacon/pork loin steaks etc flying/gliding/jumping super high etc.

It's just a simple adynaton, which is also a form of hyperbole (exaggeration for effect).

I don't see the relevance of the link about radiation either.
edit on 242224/1/1616 by TerryDon79 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 24 2016 @ 06:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: ignorant_ape
now for the crunch - where EXACTLY would an alledged hoax save money ?

come on - lets have it


It is obvious



posted on Jan, 24 2016 @ 06:25 PM
link   
a reply to: Misinformation

Seriously?

You actually think the pittance that NASA's apollo budget represented would be of any importance to those, supposed, shadow rulers?

Seriously? No, you're having one over on us, right?



posted on Jan, 24 2016 @ 06:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: seagull
a reply to: Misinformation

Seriously?

You actually think the pittance that NASA's apollo budget represented would be of any importance to those, supposed, shadow rulers?

Seriously? No, you're having one over on us, right?

Frankly, the NASA budget in 1964 to 1968 was a relatively large chunk of the entire federal budget. In 1965 and 1966, it was more than 4% of the federal budget (by the way, it's about 0.5% of the budget today).

The reason we got to the Moon in the 1960s was that such a relatively large chunk of the federal budget was dedicated to doing so. That's also why big advances in space travel are not happening today -- because hardly any of the budget goes to NASA today, and the money that does go to NASA is spread among many more programs than it was in the 1960s, when almost all of the money went towards Apollo.



posted on Jan, 24 2016 @ 06:59 PM
link   
a reply to: Soylent Green Is People

In comparison with the supposed wealth implied by throwing out the Rothschilds, morgans, etc..., names? Surely they can get that kind of money by going to the bank?

Four percent is still rather a pittance in comparison to total budget, but I understand your point.



posted on Jan, 24 2016 @ 07:01 PM
link   
a reply to: Shamrock6

You’ll keep a secret when you have a gun to head



posted on Jan, 24 2016 @ 07:52 PM
link   
a reply to: Willtell

the problem is that this alledged " threar of death " etc etc doesnt actually work in real life

citation :

mafia informants

germans who aided jews during WWII

etc etc etc



posted on Jan, 24 2016 @ 08:01 PM
link   
a reply to: Misinformation

what utter twaddle - its a colloquialism - do you even understand what that means ???

its just like saying " pigs will fly before...................... "

the desperation you have sunk to is amusing though



posted on Jan, 24 2016 @ 08:02 PM
link   
a reply to: ignorant_ape




the desperation you have sunk to is amusing though

It's actually been at a pretty consistent level from the get go.



posted on Jan, 25 2016 @ 09:26 PM
link   
Operation Avalanche

one is left thinking that a CIA-led scheme could have at least been feasible


Operation Avalanche: Faking the Moon Landing

it would make for a pretty compelling case against the CIA deceiving the American people


Moonwalkers - backup scenario

I’m not sure he’s acting here



Propaganda Ban Repealed


edit on 25-1-2016 by Misinformation because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
57
<< 37  38  39    41  42  43 >>

log in

join