It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Renowned genetics expert claims to have found proof on Adam and Eve existence

page: 7
11
<< 4  5  6   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 3 2015 @ 07:19 PM
link   
a reply to: Spinx



I will say, I am a Christian and some creation based studies I do find interesting. Yet anytime anything potentially interesting comes up it is swept aside in favor of sensationalist articles / "research" that are touted as the greatest thing since sliced bread. Oftentimes despite the fact that they have been proven 100% wrong.


Post up some of this creationist research that proves any science 100% wrong.




posted on Aug, 4 2015 @ 02:16 AM
link   
a reply to: GetHyped

I think he or she means that the creationist 'research' is 100% wrong.



posted on Aug, 4 2015 @ 11:41 AM
link   

originally posted by: cooperton
1) We barely know, for example, the truth behind 9/11, which was 14 years ago: with eye-witness testimony, camera footage, a handful of Investigative agencies, etc. How are we supposed to know what happened 4.52 billion years ago, let alone 4.52 million years ago, let alone 4.52 thousand years ago? I think we have gotten carried away with what we think we know. We barely have scratched the surface on "knowing" about the tool that, to the extent of my "knowledge", allows us to "know": the brain.


This is where your logic falls of a cliff again. 9/11 is a red herring. It has nothing to do with the scientific observations that give us a picture of what happened in the past. The whole "you weren't there" argument is beyond stupid. Science is the reason why we CAN tell what happened in the past on this planet. It might not give us every single detail of everything, but it gives us a good idea and thus far no science conflicts with old earth science, and there is no evidence whatsoever of a young earth or creation event.


2) How did natural physiological and biochemical processes come into being? How did pi and phi, numbers that have an infinite number of decimal places with no repeating sequences, both manifest in nature? Also, planetary orbits can be likened to a golf ball twirling around the rim of the hole ad infinitum.


Numbers are numbers. It's just the way the math adds up. You are trying to paint them to mean more than they mean. Numbers are human inventions. We use them to measure things. And no, your golf ball analogy is wrong, there is nothing infinte about a revolution around the sun. How did god come into being? I seriously doubt you can answer that. "How did XYZ come into being?" isn't an argument against evolution. Sorry.


If I am wrong and this phenomenon of life is all just one big accident... then it wouldn't matter anyway because endless nothingness awaits regardless of what I do with my life. I'd rather fight for hope, no matter how hopeless things may look.


So if evolution and abiogenesis are correct it automatically means endless nothingness? Man, it must suck to be in your camp. You have no clue what other folks believe, yet you sure don't mind pigeonholing them all as atheists that believe in nothing whatsoever...



 
11
<< 4  5  6   >>

log in

join