It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: In4ormant
a reply to: FlySolo
www.environmentmagazine.org...
Take some time to do some reading. Heads up, its a long article but covers everything.Game hunting ranches have increased populations on a good many animals and actually led to the reintroduction of a couple of species.
originally posted by: In4ormant
a reply to: FlySolo
www.environmentmagazine.org...
Take some time to do some reading. Game hunting ranches have increased populations on a good many animals and actually led to the reintroduction of a couple of species.
originally posted by: johnwick
originally posted by: In4ormant
a reply to: FlySolo
www.environmentmagazine.org...
Take some time to do some reading. Game hunting ranches have increased populations on a good many animals and actually led to the reintroduction of a couple of species.
Stop using facts to make a point, a lion died!!!!
Don't you understand, even though the money from the kill will help preserve the species, and many others, a lion died!!!!!
These arguments are so tiring and boring.
Reality smacking folks in the face doesn't matter, only their feelings on the subject matters.
A lion died!!!!!
No good could ever come from that!!!!
originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: johnwick
Hell, lets not get outraged at the thousands of gang-related deaths in the inner cities.
Lets drag our asses for almost a week before they lower a flag for four marines and a naval guy.
But we must make wee in our pants because some effing dentist shot an effing lion.
A study published by the pro-hunting International Council for Game and Wildlife Conservation
and the UN Food and Agriculture Organisation found that hunting operators in Tanzania
contribute only 3% of their turnover to the communities that are affected by hunting. These
calculations are supported by other authors and the conclusion that hunting contributes
insufficiently to community development is widely acknowledged.
HOW IMPORTANT IS THE TROPHY HUNTING INDUSTRY?
While all sides of the trophy hunting debate acknowledge that local communities must benefit
more from hunting revenues, little consideration is given to how much difference reforming the
industry would actually make to economic development and poverty alleviation efforts in Africa.
The implication of authors such as Safari Club International’s Rudolph and Hosmer (2011) is that
trophy hunting is a large industry. $200m in trophy hunting revenue – or even 3% of this
revenue as discussed above – sounds significant when presented in the context of undeveloped
rural communities, but it is an insignificant amount in the context of national economies.
originally posted by: FlySolo
a reply to: johnwick
Pfft no wonder all but 5 seconds half assed attempt. I read your 1 page will you read my 17?
www.ifaw.org...
Probably not. So don't tell me I need to do some reading. Here, I'll get you going...
A study published by the pro-hunting International Council for Game and Wildlife Conservation
and the UN Food and Agriculture Organisation found that hunting operators in Tanzania
contribute only 3% of their turnover to the communities that are affected by hunting. These
calculations are supported by other authors and the conclusion that hunting contributes
insufficiently to community development is widely acknowledged.
HOW IMPORTANT IS THE TROPHY HUNTING INDUSTRY?
While all sides of the trophy hunting debate acknowledge that local communities must benefit
more from hunting revenues, little consideration is given to how much difference reforming the
industry would actually make to economic development and poverty alleviation efforts in Africa.
The implication of authors such as Safari Club International’s Rudolph and Hosmer (2011) is that
trophy hunting is a large industry. $200m in trophy hunting revenue – or even 3% of this
revenue as discussed above – sounds significant when presented in the context of undeveloped
rural communities, but it is an insignificant amount in the context of national economies.
There is much evidence to suggest that hunting is less destructive than other nonconsumptive forms of ecotourism, such as photographic tourism.23
The income generated from the hunting industry far exceeds that generated from other forms of ecotourism
originally posted by: FlySolo
a reply to: In4ormant
So I'm reading your link because I would hate to be bias of course, and I come across this
There is much evidence to suggest that hunting is less destructive than other nonconsumptive forms of ecotourism, such as photographic tourism.23
Not to get off topic but, really? Suddenly I'm feeling biased. I'll continue to read but I want to see numbers. Not words, numbers...
eta:
aw what's this next line?
The income generated from the hunting industry far exceeds that generated from other forms of ecotourism
This is just flat out false. I'm on page one of your link and I'm already finding real bad information. What else is false about this info?
The hunting only contributes 2% of all ecotourism.
originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: johnwick
The same people weeping for the lion are the same ones that ignore our vets.
Priorities.