It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

‘Law & Order’ director busted on child porn charges

page: 1
3

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 29 2015 @ 09:42 PM
link   
Today's meathead of the week award goes to Jason Alexander who is alleged to be involved in some child pornography monkey business.

He is involved in some TV shows and actually was a director for the popular show Law & Order of all things !!

He's out on bail now.

*Squirrel*

Detectives Benson and Stabler are not returning phone calls.



‘Law & Order’ director busted on child porn charges



TV director Jason “Jace” Alexander was busted on child-porn charges for allegedly promoting a video showing a girl stripping and masturbating, according to the Westchester County DA’s office.

Alexander, 50, of Dobbs Ferry, the only son of actress Jane Alexander, is accused of promoting the video – depicting a girl about 12 or 13 years old – by making it available for viewing in late June on the Torrent network, according to a criminal complaint.

He also is accused of having a video file depicting a 6- to 8-year-old girl performing a sexual act on herself, according to Investigator Andrew Garcia of the DA’s High Technology Crime Bureau.



Law and Order Doink




posted on Jul, 29 2015 @ 09:44 PM
link   
Nvm
edit on 7/29/2015 by japhrimu because: Bad taste joke w/o reading/watching OP



posted on Jul, 29 2015 @ 10:11 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Have seen charges like this go either way.

Some persons torrent just about everything and rarely pay attention to it. In my country we would have to prove that the person accessed the file and was aware of its contents. Not sure what the rules are in America.



posted on Jul, 29 2015 @ 10:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: Pinke
a reply to: xuenchen

Have seen charges like this go either way.

Some persons torrent just about everything and rarely pay attention to it. In my country we would have to prove that the person accessed the file and was aware of its contents. Not sure what the rules are in America.



In America the NSA and other alphabet agencies put it on your computer to ruin your reputation and eliminate people without actually assassinating them. No one will supports someone that has a child porn charge.



posted on Jul, 30 2015 @ 01:27 AM
link   
a reply to: Metallicus
This is somewhat horrifying.

Am not a psychologist, so am not qualified to comment on this ... but you know it does kind of seem odd that a person like this would only have one or two of these things in their possession. Maybe it's a stereotype of persons who look at this type of stuff but I would have assumed they might have hundreds of items in their possession?

Just a possible observation.

Then again ... media seems to imply that lots of famous media people do these things.

edit on 30-7-2015 by Pinke because: Then again ...



posted on Jul, 30 2015 @ 02:39 AM
link   

originally posted by: Metallicus

originally posted by: Pinke
a reply to: xuenchen

Have seen charges like this go either way.

Some persons torrent just about everything and rarely pay attention to it. In my country we would have to prove that the person accessed the file and was aware of its contents. Not sure what the rules are in America.



In America the NSA and other alphabet agencies put it on your computer to ruin your reputation and eliminate people without actually assassinating them. No one will supports someone that has a child porn charge.


Preach...

A picture of CP came up on my pandora once. it was a little girl maybe 11 or 12 topless holding an airplane dildo. I figured if pandora could let something like this slip then anyone could accidentally DL CP or have it placed on one of their drives.



posted on Jul, 30 2015 @ 03:18 AM
link   

originally posted by: AlongCamePaul

originally posted by: Metallicus

originally posted by: Pinke
a reply to: xuenchen

Have seen charges like this go either way.

Some persons torrent just about everything and rarely pay attention to it. In my country we would have to prove that the person accessed the file and was aware of its contents. Not sure what the rules are in America.



In America the NSA and other alphabet agencies put it on your computer to ruin your reputation and eliminate people without actually assassinating them. No one will supports someone that has a child porn charge.


Preach...

A picture of CP came up on my pandora once. it was a little girl maybe 11 or 12 topless holding an airplane dildo. I figured if pandora could let something like this slip then anyone could accidentally DL CP or have it placed on one of their drives.


You spotted a Blind Faith album cover. Nope that wasn't a dildo.
That was the 60's. You can't get away with that now.




posted on Jul, 30 2015 @ 04:56 AM
link   
a reply to: rupertg

Haha thats it!

Nice to see I was descriptive enough for you to call it out. lol

I deleted the channel from my pandora 2 secs later. Had to reevaluate my choice in music after that.



posted on Jul, 30 2015 @ 05:01 AM
link   

originally posted by: Pinke
a reply to: xuenchen

Have seen charges like this go either way.

Some persons torrent just about everything and rarely pay attention to it. In my country we would have to prove that the person accessed the file and was aware of its contents. Not sure what the rules are in America.



Hosting or sharing of any kind will result in a conviction more than likely. It's probably part of some larger task force investigation. The US, Canada and Mexico do a lot of work in human trafficking and child sexual exploitation together, so they don't have to worry about border rule nonsense.

They don't need to prove he viewed it. They'll only need to prove it was on his network and his devices. The simple act of being in possession is a federal crime.

~Tenth



posted on Jul, 30 2015 @ 11:02 AM
link   
a reply to: tothetenthpower
Hiya tenth,

I did some reading. Most common formally raised American defenses:

* Downloaded CP unintentionally or unknowingly
* Someone else had physical access to the device and downloaded the CP
* Addiction or mental illness
* Images were not CP
* Downloaded CP for research

Most prosecutors report dealing with over 10 images at a time, however they would push for one or two images if the situation was correct. It appears most cases end with guilty pleas and the vast majority don't go to trial.

I guess though what you are maybe saying is because the person downloaded it and continued to store it that would be evidence of knowing possession?



new topics

top topics



 
3

log in

join