It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
And given Zaphod's info,
originally posted by: YouPeople
The parts that are powered and make the flaperon move are not situated in the wing and extended to the flaperon?
Instead they are situated in the flaperon and extended to the wing?
The flap track mechanism and hydraulics are located in the wing while flap slot one extension actuators are inside the flaperon.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Shamrock6
The plate with the serial number debonded while it was in the water, so they'll have to go deeper and get the serial numbers off the actuators and internal pieces, then go back to the manufacturer and see which flaperon they installed those parts on, and trace it that way.
originally posted by: St Udio
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Shamrock6
The plate with the serial number debonded while it was in the water, so they'll have to go deeper and get the serial numbers off the actuators and internal pieces, then go back to the manufacturer and see which flaperon they installed those parts on, and trace it that way.
I attempted to alert the thread posters that the identification of this particular part (a 'flaperon') cannot be proof positive that the physical Flaperon was originally & forever installed on Boeing 777 MH370
the Flaperon could very well be part of MH17 wreckage shot down in July 2014 in Ukraine...
the parts numbers of both MH370 & MH17 Left side Flaperon can or could be switched very easily, by a hacker into the Boeing Plant Historical log of that particular aircraft, so as to falsely 'confirm' the physical object washed ashore is indeed from the missing passenger given the identity known as MH-370 over the Indian Ocean
believe 1/2 of what-you-see and None of what-you-hear..... (a line from the old classic song: I heard it through the Grapevine
the scattered 777 parts, seats, other small items ...all seem to be stuff that would be removed from a passenger Jet that is converted into a bomb carrying missile on a one way trip to martyrdom or a false-flag attack
~ I sure don't see any super-structure components being discovered --- so, to my reasoning the debris follows the model of being a staged discovery which point to the debris being wrongly identified as all being wreckage from MH-370 and not at all being a 'flaperon' from Jet MH-17 to cover up the hijacking of the Bejing ? bound flight MH-370 which is being concealed for future use !
originally posted by: St Udio
a reply to: jaffo
to each their own
I want solid proofs not cobbled assumptions
911 is another thing that needed deeper investigation, so is this action...
Abdul Aziz said the most definitive confirmation of its origin would have to come from Boeing, saying the aircraft manufacturer performed modifications to the flaperon that would make it easy to identify. "There have been some modifications to internal beams in the flaperon. Only Boeing can verify (that the flaperon came from MH370). The modifications were done by Boeing," he said. "Only after they verify the internal parts of the flaperon can they be sure that it is from MH370."