It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: skyeagle409
According to Protec, the demolition experts, their seismic monitors did not detect signals from demo explosions, which is understandable because there was no evidence of demo explosions at ground zero.
Now if you knew ANYTHING about wave propagation through bedrock, vibration decoupling effects, and how impossible in the first place it would be for that station at 34 km away to register anything but impulsive data from explosions, you would not be pushing that rubbish on me and the rest of the readership here. I know what that scientific document says is total truth, because I have 10 years or more watching seismic data myself. And not just on waveforms. But on spectrographs too. I know amplitudes, and I know relative propagation distances for various sized events. And not only that, but I can tell you what specific frequencies propagate how far.
. There were bombs. Face the facts.
originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: TrueAmerican
Are you now prepared to post those time lines from the WTC videos that prove demo detonations occurred as those buildings collapse? Yes or no.
There were bombs, people. The document proves it, at least for me, way beyond the shadow of a doubt.
Why in the world would you rely on a video, when a seismometer tells the tale so clearly?
Especially when its data is analyzed by a seismologist who knows the characteristic impulse signatures from explosions?
There were bombs, people.
Very POWERFUL bombs,...
Did experts on the scene think WTC 7 was a controlled demolition?
"Several demolition teams had reached Ground Zero by 3:00 pm on 9/11, and these individuals witnessed the collapse of WTC 7 from within a few hundred feet of the event.
e have spoken with several who possess extensive experience in explosive demolition, and all reported seeing or hearing nothing to indicate an explosive detonation precipitating the collapse.
* Controlled Demolition Inc
* D.H. Griffin Companies
* Mazzocchi Wrecking
* Gateway Demolition
* Yannuzzi Demolition & Disposal
'A Critical Analysis of the Collapse of WTC Towers, 1, 2 & 7 From an Explosives and Demolition Industry Viewpoint'
Indications of the Imminent Collapse of the World Trade Center Buildings Disprove Explosives Theory
Scientists investigating the Sept. 11, 2001 collapse of the twin towers said, "the World Trade Center towers showed telltale signs they were about to collapse several minutes before each crumbled to the ground." There would not be telltale signs if it was explosives (Controlled Demolition) that caused the buildings to collapse.
"In the case of the north tower, police chopper pilots reported seeing the warning signs - an inward bowing of the building facade - at least eight minutes before it collapsed at 10:29 a.m." New York Daily News reporter Paul Shin wrote in his June 19th, 2004 article 9/11 cops saw collapse coming.
Fire, Not Extra Explosives, Doomed Buildings, Expert Says
A New Mexico explosives expert says he now believes there were no explosives in the World Trade Center towers, contrary to comments he made the day of the Sept. 11 terrorist attack.
"Certainly the fire is what caused the building to fail," said Van Romero, a vice president at the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology.
American Society of Civil Engineers
Towers Weakened by Planes; Brought Down by Fire
... is what the seismographic data shows.
You cannot compare a random video of the Landmark implosion with a random video of a twin tower.
DEMOLITION BROUGHT DOWN WTC 7
Well, if that is the case, you should no have a problem posting the time lines where demo explosions are heard in the WTC7 video. So, let's try it again and post those demo explosion time lines in the following video of WTC7. If you cannot post a single time line of demo explosions, then it will become evident that no demo explosives were involved.
Maybe you didn't read what I said. I was referring to the video with Ashleigh Banfield. A genuine video
That won't fly, because the evidence is in; Fire, in conjunction with impact damage, was responsible for the collapse of WTC1, WTC2, and WTC7 and the internal collapse of WTC5.
our OS evidence is as phony as a three dollars bill.
I believe a plane hit the pentagon but it could be that only one camera picked it up or maybe even none of them.
The tower should be stripped and be empty and the same kind of explosives should be used and the videos should be raw.
Correct, he did not, this video clearly has the demo charges going off, the reaction of the reporter is a no brainer, however he does not want to accept that...