It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

WTC-7 Mysteries FINALLY Solved.

page: 30
160
<< 27  28  29    31  32  33 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 12 2015 @ 03:20 AM
link   
a reply to: Korg Trinity

In regards to your first video where squibs are seen blasting out of the windows, that is from compressed air as WTC 7 collapsed, which has nothing to do with explosives.

Squibs,which are compressed air, can be seen in this video and be aware that explosives were not used.



Apparently, someone duped conspiracy theorist into thinking the squibs were the result of explosives and I have repeatedly warned conspiracy theorist about a campaign to discredit the Truth Movement with disinformation and hoaxed videos.

Apparently, there were conspiracy theorist who became upset after they determined that their movement was being comprised with hoaxed and bogus videos and disinformation, but apparently, it came too late for them because the damage has been done by the fact that other conspiracy theorist had already spread the hoaxed videos and disinformation on the Internet where they were reposted time and time again.

In fact, I posted a hoaxed video and shortly afterward, a conspiracy theorist unknowingly reposted that same hoaxed video in his argument against me, of all people!!

I let him have it with both barrels by letting him know that the video was a hoax and It was I, who posted that hoaxed video to prove my point that conspiracy theorist were posting hoaxed and bogus videos and spreading disinformation. That is one example of many as to why the Truth Movement is now a laughing stock.

Simply amazing!!!
edit on 12-8-2015 by skyeagle409 because: (no reason given)




posted on Aug, 12 2015 @ 03:22 AM
link   
a reply to: Korg Trinity

This guy's putting up vids of the WTC7 collapse with a timer that
starts in between 4 and 5 seconds before the collapse even begins
and runs conservatively two seconds after it ends. This guy doesn't
deserve the time a day.



posted on Aug, 12 2015 @ 03:28 AM
link   
a reply to: randyvs

Take a look at the collapse of the penthouse, because it is all part of the total collapse of WTC 7. Add to the fact that you don't hear demolition explosions as WTC 7 collapses in any video except that one that was hoaxed by Eddy Current.



posted on Aug, 12 2015 @ 03:39 AM
link   

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: Korg Trinity

In regards to your first video where squibs are seen blasting out of the windows, that is from compressed air as WTC 7 collapsed, which has nothing to do with explosives.


So you think that it's perfectly natural for compressed air to shoot down one side of the building blowing out only the windows directly under each other in perfect symmetry all down the side of the building instantaneously at the point of collapse??

You would have to either be stupid or crazy to think that.


originally posted by: randyvs
a reply to: Korg Trinity

This guy's putting up vids of the WTC7 collapse with a timer that
starts in between 4 and 5 seconds before the collapse even begins
and runs conservatively two seconds after it ends. This guy doesn't
deserve the time a day.



edit on 12-8-2015 by Korg Trinity because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 12 2015 @ 03:39 AM
link   

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: randyvs

Take a look at the collapse of the penthouse, because it is all part of the total collapse of WTC 7. Add to the fact that you don't hear demolition explosions as WTC 7 collapses in any video except that one that was hoaxed by Eddy Current.



No explosives??

It was a bloody Missile or a Drone!!



posted on Aug, 12 2015 @ 04:42 AM
link   
a reply to: Korg Trinity



No explosives??


No explosives, which is what you don't hear as WTC 1, WTC 2, and WTC 7 collapses.


It was a bloody Missile or a Drone!!


Impossible. My Wing Commander was in the Pentagon when American 77 struck and I have identified B-757 wreckage in the colors of American Airlines inside and outside the Pentagon, In other words, someone dupe Truthers that a missile struck the Pentagon, and they duped the Truthers again when they claimed that missiles took out WTC 1 and WTC 2.

Take a look at this video and stop at time line 0:03 and identify the missile that struck WTC 2 for us.




edit on 12-8-2015 by skyeagle409 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 12 2015 @ 04:50 AM
link   
a reply to: Korg Trinity



So you think that it's perfectly natural for compressed air to shoot down one side of the building blowing out only the windows directly under each other in perfect symmetry all down the side of the building instantaneously at the point of collapse??


Simple scientific logic that I learned back in high school. Do you know how a syringe works? Just think of the WTC buildings as giant syringes and remember, the interior of those buildings are mostly air, so where do you think all of that air is going to go as the floors pancake down upon one another?

The fact that you can see squibs of compressed air being forced out of buildings under the Verinage demolition method, a method that does not use explosives, should have been a clue for you.

Check out these photos if you missed the Verinage demolition video.

Photo of Verinage Demolition Produced Squibs of Compressed Air 1

Photo of Verinage Demolition Produced Squibs of Compressed Air 2

Just another example of how certain people have been duping conspiracy theorist over the years into thinking the WTC squibs were the result of explosives, and doing so in the absence of any audio sounds of explosions as the WTC buildings collapsed.


edit on 12-8-2015 by skyeagle409 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 12 2015 @ 05:53 AM
link   

originally posted by: skyeagle409

Impossible. My Wing Commander was in the Pentagon when American 77 struck and I have identified B-757 wreckage in the colors of American Airlines inside and outside the Pentagon, In other words, someone dupe Truthers that a missile struck the Pentagon, and they duped the Truthers again when they claimed that missiles took out WTC 1 and WTC 2.


Now we are getting to the bottom of your inability to process any information that goes against your well established view... you are in the military.... do not think for yourself... you think what they tell you to.

I believe we were talking about the pentagon... the Pentagon was clearly not damaged by a 757 aircraft... The notion that an unidentified aircraft could get into the airspace of the pentagon totally unauthorized to begin with is undeniable stupendous.

There is more than a wealth of information on how it would be impossible for a person trained on a crop duster single prop plane to then take a 757 to beyond is nominal operating limits and perfectly fly horizontally into the side of the pentagon, less than 10 feet above the ground at 400 knots or so.

Besides... where is the wreckage??

The tail?

The wings?

The engines?

Where are all the bodies?

or would you have us all believe that not only was the pilot able to do a one in a billion chance run on the pentagon, but also by chance the entire plane simply vaporized?? Are you even taking stock of what you are thinking??



Simple scientific logic that I learned back in high school. Do you know how a syringe works? Just think of the WTC buildings as giant syringes and remember, the interior of those buildings are mostly air, so where do you think all of that air is going to go as the floors pancake down upon one another?


As a physicist and mathematician by trade I can tell you that there is ZERO chance that the air would naturally cause only the windows in a vertical line right down only one side to be blown out.

If the building was air tight, which it was not, then the air would be pushed out in all directions, not focused onto one area again and again all the way down in perfect symmetry.... unless it was designed to do so. In other words you would expect to see the windows being blown out horizontally all around the WT7.... which is not what happened.

Besides had the building been air tight then they fires would have burned at a much lower temperature due to being oxygen starved.



edit on 12-8-2015 by Korg Trinity because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 12 2015 @ 05:55 AM
link   

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: Korg Trinity

Check out these photos if you missed the Verinage demolition video.

Photo of Verinage Demolition Produced Squibs of Compressed Air 1

Photo of Verinage Demolition Produced Squibs of Compressed Air 2



You just proved my above point...

A Horizontal all around pressure wave... Not a Vertical perfectly in line up and down only pressure wave.



posted on Aug, 12 2015 @ 06:03 AM
link   
This video has some reliance...




posted on Aug, 12 2015 @ 06:52 AM
link   
WTC1/2 & 7 were definitely pre charged. For all 3 building to collapse perfectly on there own footprint due to localized damage is as ludicrous as saying if a aircraft carrier gets hit by a torpedo (and the flooding is stopped), it will eventually collapse into its own footprint onto the surface of the water before it sinks due to a fire. Essentially the WTC 1/2 & 7 with a outer and inner core re-enforced steel beam structure were built like a battleship up right.

You cant argue with the structural engineers.



posted on Aug, 12 2015 @ 08:27 AM
link   

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: Informer1958



That is your "opinion" and it is not a fact.


My experience and knowledge automatically overrules your lack of knowledge.


That is an arrogant statement, but typical for a person still defending the poppycock that is the official story 15 years later.



posted on Aug, 12 2015 @ 08:29 AM
link   

originally posted by: Salander

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: Informer1958



That is your "opinion" and it is not a fact.


My experience and knowledge automatically overrules your lack of knowledge.


That is an arrogant statement, but typical for a person still defending the poppycock that is the official story 15 years later.


The very fact that there can be a debate fifteen years later proves that the OS is BS



posted on Aug, 12 2015 @ 08:33 AM
link   

originally posted by: Korg Trinity
So you think that it's perfectly natural for compressed air to shoot down one side of the building blowing out only the windows directly under each other in perfect symmetry all down the side of the building instantaneously at the point of collapse??

I think it's perfectly natural for debris to eject with velocity down one side of a building, blowing out mostly the windows directly under each other, in perfect symmetry all down the side of the building instantaneously at the point of violent structural failure.



posted on Aug, 12 2015 @ 08:35 AM
link   

originally posted by: Korg Trinity
The very fact that there can be a debate fifteen years later proves that the OS is BS

No. It actually proves nothing.

But it demonstrates that the "Truth Movement" has manufactured such an intense air of confusion, disinformation, misinformation, and lies that serious and informed speculation has become impossible.



posted on Aug, 12 2015 @ 08:37 AM
link   
a reply to: Korg Trinity

Terrible logic. By that argument, the very fact that young earth creationists still "debate" the age of the earth proves that it is 6,000 years old.



posted on Aug, 12 2015 @ 08:45 AM
link   
a reply to: SkepticOverlord

Perhaps it demonstrates that the truth cannot be hidden from all, forever. That the truth will eventually prevail.

I can never remember the whole sentence, but in general, "you can fool all of the people some of the time, some of the people all of the time, but you cannot fool all of the people all the time."



posted on Aug, 12 2015 @ 08:46 AM
link   

originally posted by: SkepticOverlord

originally posted by: Korg Trinity
So you think that it's perfectly natural for compressed air to shoot down one side of the building blowing out only the windows directly under each other in perfect symmetry all down the side of the building instantaneously at the point of collapse??

I think it's perfectly natural for debris to eject with velocity down one side of a building, blowing out mostly the windows directly under each other, in perfect symmetry all down the side of the building instantaneously at the point of violent structural failure.


Then you would be wrong.






posted on Aug, 12 2015 @ 09:06 AM
link   
a reply to: skyeagle409

Dude you've been debunked!



posted on Aug, 12 2015 @ 09:18 AM
link   
a reply to: SkepticOverlord




I think it's perfectly natural for debris to eject with velocity down one side of a building, blowing out mostly the windows directly under each other, in perfect symmetry all down the side of the building instantaneously at the point of violent structural failure.


I would like to simply point out that everyone even I THINK,
THINK the above can happen. But what do we all KNOW, KNOW
for a fact produces the same perfect symmetry? Controlled DEMO!
So take your choice speculation or proven fact.

edit on Ram81215v20201500000051 by randyvs because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
160
<< 27  28  29    31  32  33 >>

log in

join