It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Pure liquid aluminum would be expected to appear silvery. However, the molten metal was very likely mixed with large amounts of hot, partially burned, solid organic materials (e.g., furniture, carpets, partitions and computers) which can display an orange glow, much like logs burning in a fireplace. The apparent color also would have been affected by slag formation on the surface."
"NIST concluded that the source of the molten material was aluminum alloys from the aircraft, since these are known to melt between 475 degrees Celsius and 640 degrees Celsius (depending on the particular alloy), well below the expected temperatures (about 1,000 degrees Celsius) in the vicinity of the fires.
No BS by any means, which explains why after 14 years, the evidence supports my references and facts, not the disinformation of Truthers.
Your information is extremely bias to say the lease. You are basing your information on "pseudo science" from well known debunking sites that have an agenda. I have read most if not all of them and I do not support their proven fallacies that you use to back your silly claims.
I think that you are trying to be funny considering it is basic knowledge why the cooled silvery droplets were aluminum, not steel.
False! Much of what I post is based on experience and knowledge. On the other hand, a typical Truther lives in a world of denial, and vulnerable to receiving and spreading disinformation and lies, and I have compiled a long list over the years as proof.
think you are funny considering it is basic knowledge that there was no investigation to what was poring out of the WTC.
Since tens of tons of aluminum from the airframe of United 175 was packed in that corner of WTC 2, not to mention the aliuminum facade of WTC 2, where the interior is engulfed in flames as shown in videos and photos, and the fact that laws of physics dictate that such fires generated temperatures high enough to melt aluminum, but not steel, and the fact that silvery aluminum droplets can been seen falling from that corner of WTC, and since there was nothing in the corner of WTC 2 that could have generated temperatures needed to melt steel, common sense logic says that the molten aluminum was what it was; molten aluminum.
14 years and counting and still no evidence of molten steel.
Not all Truther live in a world of denial as you falsely claim.
Well, when Truthers were using "Pilots for 9/11 Truth" against me during their arguments, I decided to pay "Pilots for 9/11 Truth" a visit and was shocked at what I was reading. They were deliberately posting disinformation and lies.
Eventually, the founder of "Pilots for 9/11 Truth", Rob Balsamo, and I, went head-to-head in another forum after I caught him deliberately posting more disinformation and lies.
I let him know that what he was posted was false. He didn't know it at the time that I was also a pilot of over 40 years experience to know that what he was posting was false information.
We are not talking about Pilots for 911 Truthers I dont care what another website has said to you. please stay on topic
The large volume of liquid metal observed pouring from the tower. The sudden appearance of the flow at the top of the window was likely the result of the formation of a pathway from the 81st floor where the aluminum possibly had pooled on top of the floor slab as it melted. This, in turn suggests that the 81st floor slab possibly sank down or pulled away from the spandrel at this time.
I would like to add that I support the OP and his wonderful job of of giving us the truth and a well put together thread.
His findings and science are un-disputable.