It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Very funny indeed.
Disinformation Killed 9/11 “Truth”
By 2009, the 9/11 “Truth” Movement was so inundated with disinformation that it had become a laughingstock. The easily-discredited claims (lies) contaminated the greater issue and soiled dissenters across the board. “Turd blossom” was a Karl Rove phrase that could describe what the movement had devolved into. The media, whether corporate or foundation-funded, could find people ranting about “the Jews” or the Illuminati, the Lizard People, the missiles, holograms, mini-nukes or space beam weapons vaporizing the Twin Towers.
www.911truth.org...
William Mark Felt, Sr. (August 17, 1913 – December 18, 2008)[1] was a Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) special agent who retired as the Bureau's Deputy Director in 1973. After keeping secret for 30 years his involvement with reporters Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein, Felt admitted to being the Watergate scandal's whistleblower, "Deep Throat," on May 31, 2005.
"handling financial affairs" aka have incentive to lie . . .
The Shaky Moral Foundation that AE911Truth is Built Upon
We reported about Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (ae911truth.org) in episode 16 of our audio reports. We worked for them as their systems administrators for almost two years. As a high-level administrator inside the organization, I witnessed a stunning degree of mismanagement and I was privy to everything.
healthwyze.org...
M4HmDwAoeOY
Now, let's take a look at Richard Gage of "AE 911 Truth."
M4HmDwAoeOYedit on 2-11-2015 by skyeagle409 because: (no reason given)
Ok then, see ya in 16 years or so!
There is an ongoing effort in this thread to throw in as many of these hoaxes as can be done, hoping that fresh readers don't know that the serious OS doubters have abandoned these hoaxes already many years ago.
16 years and there will still be no evidence
Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda
originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: HorusChrist
"handling financial affairs" aka have incentive to lie . . .
Let's take a closer look.
no lie there. gages only problem is he's afraid to call out W Bush and neocons for being responsible for 9/11.
The Shaky Moral Foundation that AE911Truth is Built Upon
We reported about Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (ae911truth.org) in episode 16 of our audio reports. We worked for them as their systems administrators for almost two years. As a high-level administrator inside the organization, I witnessed a stunning degree of mismanagement and I was privy to everything.
healthwyze.org...
M4HmDwAoeOY
Now, let's take a look at Richard Gage of "AE 911 Truth."
M4HmDwAoeOY
you brought up Watergate . . . bad idea as that was CIA committing a crime and getting away with it . . . do you know what they were looking for at that hotel, why the broke in?
originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: PublicOpinion
Ok then, see ya in 16 years or so!
16 years and there will still be no evidence, so can we expect you to push it to 20 years afterward?
Apparently, you haven't picked up on the clues that nations around the world had issued warnings prior to 9/11 that Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda wouldl be responsible for 9/11, and of course, Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda admitted that they were responsible for 9/11.
Just don't take that crap serious, why should you?
paper trail, money trail. good idea! always follow the money right?
originally posted by: PublicOpinion
a reply to: LaBTop
Just don't take that crap serious, why should you?
I mean... come on! Pilots for Truth? He must be desperate if that should be our new Gold Standart.
It's ridiculous but a good laugh though, SkyTV never disappoints.
He might have a point with regards to speeds, but when I think of remote control nearly everything might be possible. And the flight-path was rather strangely precise, it's quite obvious if you ask me.
Looking forward to read your take on this, care to elaborate on remote-controls?
a reply to: skyeagle409
16 years and there will still be no evidence
The witch of the house should recalibrate your chrystal ball, mine says we will.
Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda
Let's just assume for discussions sake they would've been the culprits here; you didn't mention the Money Trail, classified papers and other investigations.
Why would we need to rely on terrorists only? That's how a constitutional democracy would handle such a case? I know... since 9/11 it's mainly democratic on paper only, but paper doesn't blush either.
Frankly? You don't seem to fool many ATSliens with your blind obedience but I admire your persistence.
Let's just assume for discussions sake they would've been the culprits here; you didn't mention the Money Trail, classified papers and other investigations.
Why would we need to rely on terrorists only?
Frankly? You don't seem to fool many ATSliens with your blind obedience but I admire your persistence.
you brought up Watergate . . . bad idea as that was CIA committing a crime and getting away with it . . . do you know what they were looking for at that hotel, why the broke in?
A different report, the 9/11 Joint Congressional Inquiry, has been criticized for the deletion of a 28-page section. Senator Bob Graham believes this section has crucial information on the potential role of Saudi funding of the 9/11 attack.[23] The report concluded that while 15 of the 19 hijackers who carried out the attacks were from Saudi Arabia,...
... there is no evidence the government of Saudi Arabia conspired in the attackers even though the "report identifies Saudi Arabia as the primary source of al-Qaeda funding" from unknown sources. Representatives Stephen F. Lynch and Walter B. Jones, Jr. introduced a resolution urging the release of the 28 pages.
U.S. judge dismisses Sept. 11 victims' case against Saudi Arabia
A U.S. judge on Tuesday dismissed claims against Saudi Arabia by families of victims of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, who accused the country of providing material support to al Qaeda. U.S. District Judge George Daniels in Manhattan said Saudi Arabia had sovereign immunity from damage claims by families of the nearly 3,000 people killed in the attacks, and from insurers that covered losses suffered by building owners and businesses.
The ruling came just over 14 years after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, in which airliners hijacked by al Qaeda militants brought death and destruction upon the United States.
www.reuters.com...
You have to understand that reality doesn't depend on what you think.
You have to understand that reality doesn't depend on what you think. After all, 14 years and counting, 9/11 Truthers have yet to produce a single shred of evidence that WTC 7 was taken down by demo explosives, which explains why they cannot produce the demo timelines in the WTC 7 video that I have been requesting.
Funny that you mention it, as I would agree with you here to some degree.
Thing is, I have to wonder why you brought up notorious liar Rob B.'s opinion in the first place. Opinions only matter when they approve yours, eh? [/qlute]
Very simple! The NoC flight path was so ridicules that even Rob could not resist putting his foot down. I might add that even Hollywood would have had a difficult time trying to depict American 77 conducting a NoC flight path and then, strike the Pentagon in a slight left bank near ground level, which was impossible anyway.
The fact is, There is not one ounce of truth to this source, more Yellow Journalism from a disgruntle hack who end up being locked out of A&E computers because he was up to not good.
False! Remember, it has been 14 years and counting, and yet, not a single piece of evidence supporting an inside job,