It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Aazadan
I didn't, but I'm familiar with the argument. I've discussed it with a few actual economists.
Do I need to quote the numbers from when we drug tested food stamp recipients?
How about quoting the numbers proposed to eliminate social security fraud compared to what it's costing? Eliminating fraud is great, but when you spend more than it's costing you to stop all you're doing is amplifying the problem.
I went homeless putting the money to tuition to pay for community college, then I've used Pell Grants at low cost universities.
I said 40 years ago, here's a link for you
www.businessinsider.com...
originally posted by: Aazadan
Sorry, accidentally deleted my post the first time and had to rewrite it forgot to rewrite this part. Since you like Forbes here's another article.
www.forbes.com...
Essentially, growing the money supply doesn't cause inflation which contradicts with your premise that we need to have a non fiat currency in order to curb inflation.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
You stay at a Holiday Inn too? How are you going to discuss the point if you are not willing to see what that point is? Talk about intellectual dishonesty.
For tens years?
Why pick that arbitrary point? Why not look at the post war years as a whole? All in all it is still a good number considering the increase in population and that women now comprise a huge portion of the work force.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
It is obvious that not only do you not read and understand what I link but you obviously our not even reading half of this conversation.