U.S. Marshals Raid Sheriff Joe’s Office

a reply to: vethumanbeing

yeah, not following.

a reply to: intrepid

Damn there is epidemic proportions of Whitaker eye in this trainwreck

originally posted by: vethumanbeing

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: vethumanbeing
a reply to: Annee

Damn! Its still happening?

That was 1964.
I doubt you could get away with that today.

Oh but they do and have better recon.

In 1964 the public still supported police brutality and that the government had the right to do what they felt necessary.

It was like a raid. There was no knocking on the door.

Any FBI agents today, busting through the front door of a 16 year old girl is going to face a lawsuit.

originally posted by: intrepid

originally posted by: vethumanbeing

originally posted by: intrepid

originally posted by: vethumanbeing

originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: xuenchen

if it were a difficult story to buy...maybe. evidence supporting your claim?

Furry: How does one go back to the insanity and qualify/quantify it all over again without going through another rinse cycle?

A question to a question. The epitome of a failed argument. Or would you like to answer his question?

Give Furry a chance to respond. Epitome of a failed argument that has'nt been addressed yet? When he answers I may question. Why not answer yourself intrepid.

You've got nothing. OK.

SO; OK? you recognize NOTHING as SOMETHING and relate anyway (as in responded to this nothing post) intrepid.

originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: vethumanbeing

yeah, not following.

Have to actually read the responding posts to your replies (I suppose IMAGINE in a dream would/might could happen). Waving at you now.

originally posted by: vonclod
a reply to: intrepid

Damn there is epidemic proportions of Whitaker eye in this trainwreck

MARK TWAIN WRECK.

a reply to: vethumanbeing

3 posts. 3 different members. NO content. Think about that. I'm trying to save my fellow members some time here. Why bother? Inane is as inane does.

originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: xuenchen

Ya pursuing a case, what is this nation coming to!

Why didnt joe just hand over the documents instead of trying to destroy them?

Why didn't Hillary?

originally posted by: abe froman

originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: xuenchen

Ya pursuing a case, what is this nation coming to!

Why didnt joe just hand over the documents instead of trying to destroy them?

Why didn't Hillary?

Excellent point. Too bad it isn't the topic. As long as we play the he said/she said crap NO ONE is held responsible for their bad conduct. Which allows them to CONTINUALLY screw everyone. Agree?

originally posted by: intrepid
a reply to: vethumanbeing

3 posts. 3 different members. NO content. Think about that. I'm trying to save my fellow members some time here. Why bother? Inane is as inane does.

Now I have to think about the diabolical (be inside of your mind and relate to your being)? 3 posts, 3 different members (no content). What are you speaking of? Saving one member at a time? I am a member. I BOTHER? AS ONE INANE AS represents ITSELF in perfect inanity (whatever that means in your world).

a reply to: abe froman

I was going to put a disclaimer in that post about her, but decided not to as it didn't have anything to do with the topic.

Surprised it took this long for some one to say that, that was a softball.

Hopefully she pays for what she did someday, I wouldn't hold your breath though.

a reply to: xuenchen

Don't quit with the conspirators.
Quit with your one lined cryptic accusations that you never back up.

a reply to: intrepid

Everyone should be held accountable.

I'm no fan of Apraio, but I'm also not a fan of a Federal government refusing to enforce their own laws and then not letting anyone else enforce them either.

The LAW says the borders must be secure.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: vethumanbeing

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: vethumanbeing
a reply to: Annee

Damn! Its still happening?

That was 1964.
I doubt you could get away with that today.

Oh but they do and have better recon.

In 1964 the public still supported police brutality and that the government had the right to do what they felt necessary.

It was like a raid. There was no knocking on the door.

Any FBI agents today, busting through the front door of a 16 year old girl is going to face a lawsuit.

You cannot sue the Federal Government because there are laws in place that say YOU CANNOT.

originally posted by: abe froman
a reply to: intrepid

Everyone should be held accountable.

I'm no fan of Apraio, but I'm also not a fan of a Federal government refusing to enforce their own laws and then not letting anyone else enforce them either.

The LAW says the borders must be secure.

What do you know about what's been done to secure the border?

And that is not the problem with Arpaio. The problem with Arpaio is all of Mexican heritage are the same.

a reply to: abe froman

I have no problem with that.......... until he is removing citizens rights. You said the Fed does it. OK. Vote the bastards out. Don't use it as an excuse to allow this person to violate the Constitution.

a reply to: intrepid

Not in a million years!!!

Throw this bum out too.

originally posted by: abe froman
a reply to: intrepid

Not in a million years!!!

Throw this bum out too.

I actually searched for this one:



I agree.

a reply to: Gryphon66


To be fair, not dealing in facts is Obama's trademark. You can do anything you want.. (That's what he told all his friends when he got elected, including Tony Rezko.)

Alinski rule n=x Just say whatever is necessary and pretend everything is correct and true.n Especially when it isn't.

Not sure that is an Alinski rule, but Obama really likes it!