It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Enrollees are Guaranteed Access to Varied Coverage in the Exchanges. The Secretary
must ensure that in each Exchange, there is at least one plan available that covers abortions
beyond those allowed by Hyde and at least one plan that does not cover abortions beyond
those permitted by Hyde.
No Preemption of State or Federal Laws Regarding Abortion. The bill stipulates there is
no preemption of State laws regarding abortion coverage, funding or procedural requirements
on abortion like parental notification or consent. Similarly, the bill stipulates that there is no
preemption of Federal laws regarding abortion, including federal conscience protections,
civil rights laws, or EMTALA.
Conscience Protections for Providers and Facilities. Individual health care providers and
health care facilities may not be discriminated against because of a willingness or
unwillingness to provide, pay for, provide coverage of, or refer for abortions.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: beezzer
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: beezzer
TaDa! Enter Planned Parenthood to be the ones that actually TAKE that insurance! You don't the federal government to start forcing private clinics to offer abortion services, do you?
Why don't other places want to do it? Guess they must be haters too, huh?
If Planned Parenthood is willing to the dirty job, that others don't want to do, why not let them do it? It's a legal and justifiable service, safe, affordable and accessible to low income and uninsured women.
There are no uninsured women.
Obamacare, remember? It's the law.
Also, illegals now get Obamacare. So just go somewhere else. Planned Parenthood only does 3% anyways.
It's really such a tiny number.
Why the big deal over such a tiny fraction?
Perhaps the "big deal" is over the other 97% percent of care that Planned Parenthood provides?
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: ManBehindTheMask
I was addressing his claim that he was board certified. Apparently, he is not and only certified by the group he started.
He had been certified by that group, and is no longer. That is what I was addressing.
originally posted by: Ultralight
a reply to: CharlieSpeirs
You cannot compare the atrocities that PP has been accused of to a purported HIV outbreak. Oh wait, you just did.