It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck
originally posted by: notmyrealname
a reply to: DrumStickNinja
The FACT is (and our illustrious Beezer makes it clear), no gun laws have ever prevented a gun grime.
And just how would you prove that FACT? Please...I can hardly wait!
originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: notmyrealname
I'm still trying to figure out what gun law would have prevented this.
originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck
originally posted by: notmyrealname
a reply to: DrumStickNinja
The FACT is (and our illustrious Beezer makes it clear), no gun laws have ever prevented a gun grime.
And just how would you prove that FACT? Please...I can hardly wait!
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck
originally posted by: notmyrealname
a reply to: DrumStickNinja
The FACT is (and our illustrious Beezer makes it clear), no gun laws have ever prevented a gun grime.
And just how would you prove that FACT? Please...I can hardly wait!
This is easy to prove.. Read the words "gun crime". A crime is a violation of law right? So any gun crime that happens is not obeying some law. That's why it is a crime, it violates the law.. Duh.. So, no gun law has ever stopped a gun crime.
This doesn't include people who were going to violate a gun law and then got scared and said "oh this is illegal, I better not do that"..
originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck
originally posted by: notmyrealname
a reply to: DrumStickNinja
The FACT is (and our illustrious Beezer makes it clear), no gun laws have ever prevented a gun grime.
And just how would you prove that FACT? Please...I can hardly wait!
originally posted by: notmyrealname
a reply to: Char-Lee
Now if you could tie that together with some mutual binding act/person/matter, the theory might be views as more than a theory. Hope to see more as your theory develops.
One thing none of Houser’s former friends understand is why he was in Louisiana, and how he could be described as a “drifter” by law enforcement. Hostilo said he believed Houser had been financially secure.
“I always understood his family was very wealthy and that he was very wealthy,” Hostilo added. “He’s not the kind of person I would have thought would drift away from everyone he knew.”
Hostilo said Houser said he got his law degree to fight city hall. Despite his hot head in politics, Houser was a friendly guy who had many friends and loved his family, he said.
He said Houser immediately started complaining about the Obama administration and decrying the attack on Confederate heritage.
“He said people were out to destroy the Confederacy, that they want to destroy our heritage,” Hostilo recalled. “And I said, ‘Who?’ and he said, ‘the homosexuals.”
He was very outspoken, highly intelligent, really didn't trust government and anything about government. He always thought something was going on behind the scenes.
originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck
originally posted by: notmyrealname
a reply to: DrumStickNinja
The FACT is (and our illustrious Beezer makes it clear), no gun laws have ever prevented a gun grime.
And just how would you prove that FACT? Please...I can hardly wait!
originally posted by: ~Lucidity
Too bad it appears he got his gun in Alabama.
[Link]
ETA: Legally.
originally posted by: ~Lucidity
Too bad it appears he got his gun in Alabama.
[Link]
ETA: Legally.
Has been convicted in any court of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year