It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ghostrager
What is a father in today's society? According to television shows, commercials and movies; he's a fat, lazy, stupid, and extremely selfish individual.
originally posted by: ghostrager
What is a father in today's society?
According to television shows, commercials and movies; he's a fat, lazy, stupid, and extremely selfish individual.
While many will write that off as entertainment and marketing, it is an erroneous social consensus on what fathers are.
Too many people today dismiss the role of Fathers and their importance with their children.
They ignore all the wisdom and guidance of what fathers have to offer, in exchange for complicity and obedience in the child.
Quick facts on children raised in fatherless homes:
The best question; since a child is the offspring of a male and female(50/50), why is it acceptable by society, and overwhelmingly enforced by courts, that the mother rears the child primarily and the father secondary?
When will fathers have equal rights to their children?
When will children have equal rights to their parents?
In this age of equality, where is the support for fathers?
You do realize your entire post is an attack on everyone that's not the father, right?
Where is the positive pro-father?
originally posted by: ghostrager
a reply to: Annee
You do realize your entire post is an attack on everyone that's not the father, right?
You do realize that the entire OP was a defense for children that deserve both parents equally, but are neglected, right?
What part of the OP did you have a problem with exactly? Children are deprived of their fathers while their fathers pay the majority of child support and spend the least amount of time with them.
So back to your question:
Where is the positive pro-father?
He's probably stuck between working long hours to give his money away and not being able to be to be be a father because of it.
originally posted by: abe froman
Screw the kids, the court's gotta get paid!!!
I'm prolife, but if I was pro-choice I'd be infuriated that I'm enforced to pay finacially for a mutual act when I had no choice in the matter.
That would be your choice. So you're pro-choice.
Two people make a baby. Everyone knows the risks involved.
originally posted by: ghostrager
a reply to: rockintitz
That would be your choice. So you're pro-choice.
Two people make a baby. Everyone knows the risks involved.
Let's look at this without gender:
Parent #1 has complete control over the birth of the child.
Parent # 2 has no control
Both "parents" conjoined to create the child
Parent # 2 has no say on the birth, but is liable for 18 years of financial support if Parent #1 chooses birth. Even though the act of procreation was mutual.
What possible sense does this make? If Parent #2 doesn't agree to the birth, why be FORCED to pay for 18 years, without choice, when the act was mutual?
originally posted by: abe froman
a reply to: Annee
Yes, can't get past the magistrate to appear in front of the judge.
In 9 appearances, each time he says "I'll enter a written ruling"
...and 3 months later he produces some cockamamie BS that does nothing and in no way reflects the evidence actually presented in court.
I have several times submitted evidence in court that disappeared before the rulings.
Welcome to Cleremont Oh,Co Court.
-90% of all homeless and runaway children are from fatherless homes – 32 times the average.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: ghostrager
Another frightening statistic: nearly 37% of child maltreatment is perpetrated by the mother acting alone. Nearly 19% is perpetrated by the father acting alone.