It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Syyth007
a reply to: beezzer
Indeed, man is a narcissistic species, but I'd argue our insignificance on overall biological life of this planet - we are the most dominant advanced species on this planet for a reason - our ability to exploit resources to support the advancement of our population is unparalleled in the natural kingdom. We have unleashed unseen forces on this planet - If modern society was to collapse, what do you think would happen to the 450+ known nuclear reactors dotted around the globe? What effect would those unattended reactors have on biological life? It takes massive resources, and much time to safely decommission a nuclear reactor.
If not properly decommissioned, an unattended nuclear reactor will eventually result in a nuclear chain reaction - which would hive dire consequences on all biological life - not to mention the numerous nuclear/industrial waste "holding" and processing sites that would contaminate the local environment, that would not be conducive to any biological life.
I want to debate the science.
Fact co2 even factors higher has never once caused out of control warming.
Fact the co2 we are releasing was stored away in the most prolific existence of life on this planet.
Fact since it has been trapped underground the world went from tropical paradise to nonstop ice ages.
Fact plants need more co2 , at present they are in a famine.
Care to discuss these known facts?
originally posted by: Syyth007
a reply to: JacKatMtn
Weather is the current state of the atmosphere in explicit state and time - climate is the general atmospheric condition of an area over a "long" period of time.
originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: johnwick
I want to debate the science.
Cool then I hope you can answer some questions pertaining to your facts.
Fact co2 even factors higher has never once caused out of control warming.
How long ago was that? What kind of life inhabited the earth at that time and was solar irradiance higher or lower during that period?
Fact the co2 we are releasing was stored away in the most prolific existence of life on this planet.
Was that C02 stored from before or after the Great Permian Extinction? That is really important to know where that c02 originated.
Fact since it has been trapped underground the world went from tropical paradise to nonstop ice ages.
Wasn't that tropical paradise also one land mass called Pangea which was before the lands migrated with plate tectonics to the poles which were colder and allowed for ice ages?
Fact plants need more co2 , at present they are in a famine.
I am pretty sure that is not a fact. If you can show some scientific studies evidencing they are in famine then you may have something.
Care to discuss these known facts?
Yup this is a start.
originally posted by: JacKatMtn
originally posted by: Syyth007
a reply to: JacKatMtn
Weather is the current state of the atmosphere in explicit state and time - climate is the general atmospheric condition of an area over a "long" period of time.
So what cannot be accurately predicted by science tomorrow (weather) should not diminish the crystal clarity of science's ability to predict in the distant future (climate).. I think I have it now.. thanks.
Are you claiming that climatologists say such a thing?
but I can without a doubt tell you in 30 years X temp and weather will occur with 100 percent accuracy.
originally posted by: Greven
originally posted by: SPECULUM
The planet will always readjust, whether we Survive or not
There's the question then - do you wish to see humanity survive?
People say this all the time, that it will carry on... as if we do nothing to this world. That we do not dig holes visible from space (we do). That we do not alter the rotation of the planet (we have). That what we do does not matter (it does).
What is your end logic here - that we should not do anything? You vastly underestimate humanity.
originally posted by: Syyth007
a reply to: beezzer
Political solutions won't "fix" the problem. I don't know anyone who actually understands the problem who thinks a carbon tax will fix anything - just because politicians are willing to exploit a problem for revenue generation does not make that problem invalid - that is what is known, commonly, as a straw man argument, and it is a common logical fallacy.
But, climate change is but one symptom of a much larger sickness - it's the fever that accompanies the flu, to use a bad analogy. Modern society is completely reliant upon exponential growth to survive - we need a growth in production/population, around .1% annually, to maintain the global society we have implemented.
Funny thing about exponential systems bound by finite resources - they're unsustainable.
There is an old proverb about exponential systems, where a "magi" helps a king with a problem, and his request for payment is thus: He presents a checkerboard, and asks that his payment be one grain of rice on the first square on the first day, two grains of rice on the second square on the the next day, four grains of rice on the third day, eight grains of rice on the fourth day, and so on, until he reaches the end of the board, and his debt would be paid - if he could not pay his debt, he would surrender his rule to the Magi.
The King had no foresight, and thought the magi a fool. He agreed to the deal believing he would have no problem supplying the rice required by the Magi - By the time he produced the rice for over half the board, the growth rate had increased from a few measly grains of rice into whole harvests, and was growing everyday, to the point that it was impossible to make the payment to the Magi well before the end of the board...