Scott Walker: We might have to take military action on Day One

a reply to: jimmyx

It was...until Walker.

Drinking? spin free water.

a reply to: beezzer

Maybe we should just lock him up for "thoughts crimes".

Because lord knows if you can't criticize the idiotic policies of the Republican candidates because you'll be guilty of stripping away said candidates freedom of speech. How's that for circular logic? You need an award for that Beez.

originally posted by: Southern Guardian
a reply to: beezzer

Maybe we should just lock him up for "thoughts crimes".

Because lord knows if you can't criticize the idiotic policies of the Republican candidates because you'll be guilty of stripping away said candidates freedom of speech. How's that for circular logic? You need an award for that Beez.

Hey!

Just getting into the spirit of hate here!

(gee, I thought you'd at least say thanks for thinking of it! )

a reply to: jimmyx
Lousy example.

I sure don't have all the answers-pretty base retort on your part- but I can say the public sector unions don't have any answers and are, in fact, part of the over-all problem.

One thing I can assume, though, if the damn street-sweepers and ditch-diggers weren't sitting on easy street, benefit-wise and wage-wise, the teacher could probably get better pay than they are now. (As long as we can fire their asses when they suck at their jobs, that is)

What I find hilarious is all the bashing of all the Candidates for the GOP ..........

Meanwhile you have an old socialist and an old Hag guilty of aiding gunrunning, letting people die and probably having people killed to further her and her husbands political carerrs (the list goes on)........

At least we have some options!

Although I have noticed that with the "GOP are racists" has become a bit quieter considering the Dems have two old rich white people and we have a Cuban, an Indian, a female and a Latino.......

originally posted by: nwtrucker
a reply to: jimmyx

After Walker, then red...

After two recall elections as well.

Pre-Walker? BLUE.

Besides a democrat from California??? Guffaw.

so you agree with me...since 2010 Wisconsin has been a red state...thanks

a reply to: ManBehindTheMask

I take it you agree with Scott Walker?

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Southern Guardian

If a Republican gets in office and declares war on Iran, I think I may have to renounce my citizenship because such an action would be a war crime.

I'll donate for your ticket, oh and don't forget to pay your exit tax on the way out.

originally posted by: Southern Guardian
a reply to: ManBehindTheMask

I take it you agree with Scott Walker?

You make a lot of assumptions when I said nothing of the sort

Typical Southern Guardian

a reply to: ChiefD

Then why is he in power??

Current polls, perhaps? LMAO. Those you trust? No wonder the left is losing at every level of gov't in the country...

a reply to: jimmyx

Which says the then Blue voters like what they're getting...get it?

a reply to: ManBehindTheMask

It wasn't an assumption, it was a question. So you don't agree with Scott Walker then I take it? No?

a reply to: Southern Guardian

Why do you hate people who don't necessarily agree w you so much?

That's part of the problem, so blinded by your own partisan bs you can't see common sense if it slapped you in the face

We've been at war for 14 yrs now

Now we have ISIS and even more upheaval.

Of COURSE the next president will have to be ready to undertake that.

originally posted by: Southern Guardian
a reply to: ManBehindTheMask

It wasn't an assumption, it was a question. So you don't agree with Scott Walker then I take it? No?

Yes it was an assumption, because NOTHING in my post said anything pertaining to Scott Walker

And you said "I take it"

So it was an assumption, and a bait tactic....

My comment is exactly what it says

I'd like to see a comparison, side-by-side of Walker and Hillary.

Maybe the OP can show us how awesome her reign would be over evil-guy Walker.

a reply to: OptimisticCynic

Why do you hate people who don't necessarily agree w you so much?

In other words, why don't I stop criticizing people on their support for war with Iran because it hurts their feelings? My answer you that question is, it's my right. You don't like it? Go somewhere else.

That's part of the problem, so blinded by your own partisan bs

What's my partisan BS? Who do I support? I think it's you who's clearly blinded considering you decided to jump right in this thread attacking those critical of Walkers position and those of his supporters.

Yep.

We've been at war for 14 yrs now

Now we have ISIS and even more upheaval.

Of COURSE the next president will have to be ready to undertake that.

What does ISIS have to do with attacking Iran? Considering Iran is waging war against ISIS. There's a clear difference between Walker wanting to wage a war against Iran, a country that hasn't declared war against us, made a diplomatic agreement with us and other nations, and somebody wanting to take action against ISIS, a threatening organization in the ME. We're talking about Iran here buddy. Not ISIS.

Do you agree with Walker?

a reply to: Southern Guardian
You make it really easy to see how partisan you are with the simple fact you automatically jump to the conclusion walker wants to go to war w Iran

You forget there are other countries in the region ready to slam the hammer down on them if they get a nuke

Your partisan diatribe shows because you lack all perspective and only see what you want to see

Not only that any member that comes on and makes a comment get attacked by your hateful tone

originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask
So it was an assumption, and a bait tactic....

I find it amusing that we have a collection of people here who are so reluctant to say whether or not they agree with what Walker said. Instead it's a whole bunch of strawman and deflection. It's "but Obama this, liberals that" etc etc. So aggressive when you actually try and get them to address the OP itself. Interesting. This criticism of Walker is clearly hitting a nerve with some folk here.

I'll tick the 'no comment' box next to your name ManBehindTheMask.

originally posted by: Southern Guardian

originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask
So it was an assumption, and a bait tactic....

I find it amusing that we have a collection of people here who are so reluctant to say whether or not they agree with what Walker said. Instead it's a whole bunch of strawman and deflection. It's "but Obama this, liberals that" etc etc. So aggressive when you actually try and get them to address the OP itself. Interesting. This criticism of Walker is clearly hitting a nerve with some folk here.

I'll tick the 'no comment' box next to your name ManBehindTheMask.

Several people have addressed it......including a poster above....and most have pretty much said the same thing

you just dont like the answer.....thats really not my problem....

a reply to: Southern Guardian

It's 15 months before the election.

WHO ARE YOU VOTING FOR?

It might help us if we knew where you were coming from in order to better facilitate our replies.