It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: intrptr
The BUK is loud when it goes, the sound is audible over a wide area, the launch signature of sound and smoke trail are distinct and pronounced.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: intrptr
Why don't you post the ENTIRE quote, instead of twisting what I said into what you WANTED it to say?
You know, where it says "as to who fired the missile".
The data recorder shows that the flight underwent sudden decompression.
The spread of the debris shows that the flight broke up at or near cruising altitude
We don't know who heard what, as the pro Russians who control the area have made sure that independent investigators have been unable to question potential witnesses.
Why won't Russia support a UN International Tribunal to uncover the truth?
Could this be because they know their favourite story that it was a Ukrainian fighter bomber that dun it is a joke,
Yet again, I said it provided no evidence AS TO WHO FIRED THE MISSILE
As to "who fired the missile" it isn't conclusively proved yet that there even was a missile. Without all the evidence in plain sight (just transcripts) you can't (conclude)who fired anything. And if you are then well… you're just blocking any true investigation into the matter.
Some of the witnesses who claim there was a second plane also state they saw it fire a rocket at the aircraft from trail. They saw the vapor trail.
Those that hide the evidence and distort the investigation are the guilty party.
ground saw this much smaller plane 7 miles above their head and even identified it as a Ukrainian jet…and they identified a plane that can't even reach that height as the culprit...really?