It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Another murdering muslim terror attack! Will obama call it work place violence again?

page: 5
47
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 16 2015 @ 09:48 PM
link   
a reply to: marg6043

Now you've done it... citing Fox News? You'll be fending them off all night now.




posted on Jul, 16 2015 @ 09:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: CJCrawley
One more incident to add to the dossier.

Friends, people, seriously - mass immigration/multiculturalism = epic fail.

Nothing good can come out of a global social engineering project which has been FOISTED upon us all, with no democratic mandate.


This country has always been multicultural.



posted on Jul, 16 2015 @ 09:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: Aloysius the Gaul
It occurs to me that the only way the OP could actually know so quickly that this was a terror attack was if they were part of the planning process!!


What are you saying???



posted on Jul, 16 2015 @ 09:51 PM
link   
a reply to: Nyiah

We are at war with extremist jihadists.

Not Islam.
Not Muslims.

Jihadist extremists who are gaining ground in the Middle East and performing acts of terrorism here in the US.



posted on Jul, 16 2015 @ 09:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: Nyiah
So, if any Muslim that picks up a gun & goes Rambo-nutso for whatever reasons can be called a terrorist under any circumstances, then logically every single Christian that ever has as well is also one, riiiiiiiiiiight hypocrites?

At the moment, the generic term "lunatic shooter" works for me. Gotta be looney tunes to gun people down in the first place.


This was a calculated assault on U.S. Marines.

Not a random act by any means.

This guy had an agenda.

If it was random, why not just shoot at any civilians?


Plenty of attacks have agendas. Blowing up an abortion clinic or killing it's staff has an agenda. Being royally pissed at society for XYZ reason and killing random people has an agenda. Hating your job & going postal on coworkers has an agenda. Hating the IRS and attacking an office HAS AN AGENDA. The only mass killings that are distinctly random to me are the people who suddenly snap on a dime & go gonzo then & there.



posted on Jul, 16 2015 @ 09:52 PM
link   
a reply to: ProfessorChaos

Trust me I have not been in ATS this long if I have not grown a cocodrile skin, been there and been call about everything in the boosk.


Actually this news were all over the major news media, when it came out is just that fox was the first to pop up when I did the search.


In March 2015, the Islamic State's so-called Hacking Division posted the names, photographs, and addresses of about 100 U.S. servicemembers to a web site and suggested that U.S. sympathizers should kill those so listed:


With the huge amount of data we have from various different servers and databases, we have decided to leak 100 addresses so that our brothers in America can deal with you. And now we have made it easy for you by giving you addresses, all you need to do is take the final step, so what are you waiting for?



However, ISIS itself didn't threaten to take action against the persons whose names appeared on the list; and it appears the posted information was not obtained (as suggested in the message) via hacking, but rather by collecting it from publicly available sources such as news stories and social media posts:


It does not appear that the information had been hacked from government servers. One Defense Department official said that most of the information could be found in public records, residential address search sites and social media.

The officials said the list appears to be drawn from personnel who have appeared in news articles about airstrikes on the militant group.

Some of the names also appear to be drawn from the Defense Department's own official reports on the campaign against the Islamic State, also known as ISIS and ISIL.

But the list also included armed services personnel and others in the United States or elsewhere who have had nothing to do with the bombing campaigns, officials said.

For instance, the list includes B-52 crew members stationed in Louisiana and North Dakota, but the air campaign is not using those bombers, the Defense Department official said. Several women are included on the list, but their faces in the photos were blurred. One of the photos appears to be at an official meeting with President Obama.




Read more at www.snopes.com...



posted on Jul, 16 2015 @ 09:53 PM
link   
a reply to: beezzer

But, but... he's domestic. He can't be a radicalized Muslim Jihadi.... he just can't! They labeled him already.



posted on Jul, 16 2015 @ 09:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: Nyiah

We are at war with extremist jihadists.

Not Islam.
Not Muslims.

Jihadist extremists who are gaining ground in the Middle East and performing acts of terrorism here in the US.

Try to remind people of that from time to time. As it stands on ATS, all Muslims are killers out to annihilate like robotic automatons. Remember, the blanket belief is that the only good one is a dead one these days, extremist or not.



posted on Jul, 16 2015 @ 09:59 PM
link   
a reply to: marg6043

Bingo !!




posted on Jul, 16 2015 @ 10:01 PM
link   
a reply to: Nyiah

Multiple tangents won't deflect the truth this time.

Sorry.



This guy was/is one of those ISIS recruits.

Plain and simple.

There is a war going on you know that. Right?




posted on Jul, 16 2015 @ 10:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: ProfessorChaos
a reply to: beezzer

But, but... he's domestic. He can't be a radicalized Muslim Jihadi.... he just can't! They labeled him already.


Again, domestic is not the person. Unless you are talking about a domestic, Magenta:




posted on Jul, 16 2015 @ 10:05 PM
link   
a reply to: reldra

Why argue "Terrorism" ???

This was a well planned out and calculated attack by an ISIS recruit.

Goes to show that some people are never *really* "naturalized".




posted on Jul, 16 2015 @ 10:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: Nyiah

originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: Nyiah

We are at war with extremist jihadists.

Not Islam.
Not Muslims.

Jihadist extremists who are gaining ground in the Middle East and performing acts of terrorism here in the US.

Try to remind people of that from time to time. As it stands on ATS, all Muslims are killers out to annihilate like robotic automatons. Remember, the blanket belief is that the only good one is a dead one these days, extremist or not.


It's no different than when we were fighting Germany and German insurgents or sympathizers were committing acts of war on US soil.



posted on Jul, 16 2015 @ 10:07 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Exactly, it will be very irresponsible if the government starts to look at this terrorist killing of American soldiers in the US as an isolated incident when very clear we can see that this type of terrorist act was called for.

Even if is one at a time it does erode the American confident to be safe at home.

See, the worst enemy is the enemy from within.

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”
― Sun Tzu, The Art of War



posted on Jul, 16 2015 @ 10:07 PM
link   
The absolute fail of so many to comprehend what domestic means is insane to see from smart people on such an intelligent site.

It's also hilarious.

Grab a dictionary folks, you may be surprised to find out that words mean things.



And domestic isn't referring to household affairs...

Nor does it relate to animals kept as pets...



Go and have a look.

Then spend another 6 pages crying about a definition you don't understand.
edit on 16-7-2015 by CharlieSpeirs because: Missed a little "e"!



posted on Jul, 16 2015 @ 10:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: reldra

Why argue "Terrorism" ???

This was a well planned out and calculated attack by an ISIS recruit.

Goes to show that some people are never *really* "naturalized".





It was planned, he went to 2 places. No one knows if it was an ISIS recruit, unless you have information you aren't sharing. I have said it is either someone unbalanced and went insane, people of all religions have done so- or it is an act of terrorism.



posted on Jul, 16 2015 @ 10:13 PM
link   
I think motive has much bearing in determining whether it should be classified "domestic terrorism" or not.



posted on Jul, 16 2015 @ 10:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Nyiah

Multiple tangents won't deflect the truth this time.

Sorry.



This guy was/is one of those ISIS recruits.

Plain and simple.

There is a war going on you know that. Right?


What country did we declare war on?



posted on Jul, 16 2015 @ 10:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Nyiah

Multiple tangents won't deflect the truth this time.

Sorry.



This guy was/is one of those ISIS recruits.

Plain and simple.

There is a war going on you know that. Right?



So ISIS links have been proven? I'm fresh back from google here & didn't see anything that says he was so far, only that he's being checked for links to ISIS.

At the moment, until proven otherwise, his motives are -- , no wrong word there entirely, strongly suspected to be of religious origin of his own volition as much as anyone else with religious motives stemming from other books.

You sure are hot to jump the proverbial gun.
edit on 7/16/2015 by Nyiah because: Quoted wrong post

edit on 7/16/2015 by Nyiah because: Clarification



posted on Jul, 16 2015 @ 10:16 PM
link   
a reply to: beezzer

No, whether it happens on home soil is what determines if it's DT...

Not motive, not who, not when, not rainbows and gumdrops...

Just where!

Home...
Domestic...

Abroad...
Overseas...

It's quite simple Beezzer.
edit on 16-7-2015 by CharlieSpeirs because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
47
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join