It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: AnuTyr
a reply to: Woodcarver
Atheism is a religion and yes i used some humor but in all honesty. Atheists legitimately believe they *evolved* from Monkies.
And i was not lieing being here in the North Americas. You can't pass science class unless you swallow all this nonsense.
People apparently know how old rocks are too. And you need to memorize how old they are and what their names are. Lets have a religion where common belief becomes the structual norm of society that holds our fabricated realities together. Last time i checked, we are spinning around a ball of fire drifting through empty space and if i or someone has a different explaination outside the cultured norm the one belief on non-creatorism trumps the professional industry because to them. Anything other than the status quo is blaspheme. Because many professions that generate high income require a faith baised ideology and in the North West as well as the U.K, China- Global Atheism.
And your reply redicules it like as if it's some sort of joke.
Yet here we are on a part of the internet that is a little unorthadox in the ways we approach say conspiracy theories.
I'd say that there is a conspiracy for atheists to deny the regimented system other atheists have webbed together into the organized religion that denies it is a religion.
Yet Atheism is a fully government funded religious organization. In terms of how i described how they decide who is and isn't credible.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: luthier
The finely tuned universe argument is just another name for Creationism. It's a name invented so that Creationists can make their theory sound sciency. But it is equally flawed because it views the current state of the universe as a destination the universe was MEANT to achieve, but that is an unfounded assumption. There is no evidence to say that the universe has a purpose
What about cancer patients changing there dna through meditation?
originally posted by: AnuTyr
a reply to: Woodcarver
Atheism is a religion
you are referring (incorrectly) about evolution. And no, evolutionists do not believe that humans evolved from monkeys. They can show without a doubt, that apes, and humans had a common ancestor. If you are going to debate, at least learn what you are debating. If you had actually learned what evolution teaches, it would start to make more sense to you.
and yes i used some humor but in all honesty. Atheists legitimately believe they *evolved* from Monkies.
do you mean science class? Well then yes. Science is a requirement to graduate. Do you also not believe in math? Or reading?
And i was not lieing being here in the North Americas. You can't pass science class unless you swallow all this nonsense.
yes, this is science class again. This field of study is called geology, among other disciplines. All of which is very convincing. I'm sure you haven't actually looked into any of it though.
People apparently know how old rocks are too. And you need to memorize how old they are and what their names are.
it should not be common belief that structures society, that is what religion is doing for you right now.
Lets have a religion where common belief becomes the structual norm of society that holds our fabricated realities together.
you have a very distorted view of how the world works. I am sure this makes the world a very scary place.
Last time i checked, we are spinning around a ball of fire drifting through empty space and if i or someone has a different explaination outside the cultured norm the one belief on non-creatorism trumps the professional industry because to them. Anything other than the status quo is blaspheme. Because many professions that generate high income require a faith baised ideology and in the North West as well as the U.K, China- Global Atheism.
well... Your claims are ridiculous and easily disproved.
And your reply redicules it like as if it's some sort of joke.
uuuuhhh..... No its not????
Yet here we are on a part of the internet that is a little unorthadox in the ways we approach say conspiracy theories.
I'd say that there is a conspiracy for atheists to deny the regimented system other atheists have webbed together into the organized religion that denies it is a religion.
Yet Atheism is a fully government funded religious organization. In terms of how i described how they decide who is and isn't credible.
originally posted by: AnuTyr
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Saying the world came about from a big bang in a science text book is about as atheist as it gets. Saying humans came from tiny organisms that spawned after the planet cooled and then evolved into humans is also An Atheistic belief as it is a belief of human origins. Only without a creator. This is all government and privately funded in schools that teach kids.
It is a requirement to pass school. This is only grazing the nail on the head. To deny it isn't anything of the sort as i described is in of itself blaspheme.
No one knows how old rocks are but we can estimate. No one knows when dinos died and no one knows if the universe is eternal or not but were going to answers for you and tell your kids because its better if everyone is assimilated into the same belief system. Atheism.
And this is paid for by tax dollars, Not to mention the tax breaks many of these intitutions receive. Atheism in the top 5 religions to sucessfully dominate and control the flow of information as well as impose it's cultural taboo as a matter of fact as any other religion and are not any less tyrantical and controlling than the others.
originally posted by: AnuTyr
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Saying the world came about from a big bang in a science text book is about as atheist as it gets. Saying humans came from tiny organisms that spawned after the planet cooled and then evolved into humans is also An Atheistic belief as it is a belief of human origins. Only without a creator. This is all government and privately funded in schools that teach kids.
It is a requirement to pass school. This is only grazing the nail on the head. To deny it isn't anything of the sort as i described is in of itself blaspheme.
No one knows how old rocks are but we can estimate. No one knows when dinos died and no one knows if the universe is eternal or not but were going to answers for you and tell your kids because its better if everyone is assimilated into the same belief system. Atheism.
And this is paid for by tax dollars, Not to mention the tax breaks many of these intitutions receive. Atheism in the top 5 religions to sucessfully dominate and control the flow of information as well as impose it's cultural taboo as a matter of fact as any other religion and are not any less tyrantical and controlling than the others.
pretty much every thing you have said.
originally posted by: AnuTyr
a reply to: Woodcarver
Whats false about it?
many belief systems have been discarded because of new evidence being found. That would be science. If you have compelling evidence then bring it to the table. But you don't even know what science is claiming. You only parrot the strawmen that others bring forth. Learn what science has proven and why it makes the claims that it does. You can't lie about scientific claims here. We are better educated than you are. I have done many of the simple experiments that you can't even explain properly.
If i believe Aliens created humanity and have proof of it. But a prior belief system ( Atheism) Holds to the belife that humans evolved from primordial soup to apes to us in a universe that is brand new. In my oppinion will these fanatics lay down their beliefs in human godom.
this again is a weird claim that i have never heard. Isn't it a common religious theme to enlighten ones self and to be as god? To emulate the positive aspects of god and to become like him?
Because if you really want me to get down to the meat and bones of what Atheism is all about. It's the belief that humans will become God.
nope. Again atheism is not trans humanism. They are completely separate things.
Atheism is a branch into Transhumanism. Because if God does not exist then that means humans can assume personified roles as God uncontested.
i could argue that since the religious majority is in control of our legislation, that perhaps they are at fault? Name an atheist president.
Which is what this society teaches. Which has lead to the climate problems we have now. Hell theres no god theres no nothing, Burn the planet to the ground, Dig its guts out. Be the greatest economic tyrant as one can be, Atheists Unite.
nope. This again is a religious view. I believe it was a religious person who said "FTW let god sort it out"
It is this system that tries to treat everything like matter in motion on a collision course to self destruction leading to oblivion so who cares what happens right?
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: luthier
No, it was a chemist, which means that he wasn't a SME on the matter.
Like I said, the problem with the idea is that it presupposes that the universe has a purpose (life), which is a complete guess because we can't know if the universe has a purpose. If one or two variable were off, these scientists are probably right, life as we know it wouldn't exist, but that doesn't mean that life in another form wouldn't exist. Heck something else entirely could exist.
Aquinas was a philosopher and not a scientist. Sure he made some good points about the human condition. But bring those points into the modern age and psychology does a much better job of describing the mind of a person, all without bringing god in to explain the things that aquinas could not.
originally posted by: luthier
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: luthier
No, it was a chemist, which means that he wasn't a SME on the matter.
Like I said, the problem with the idea is that it presupposes that the universe has a purpose (life), which is a complete guess because we can't know if the universe has a purpose. If one or two variable were off, these scientists are probably right, life as we know it wouldn't exist, but that doesn't mean that life in another form wouldn't exist. Heck something else entirely could exist.
This is the problem when you just google things and dont read sciwntific papers or actual theory. The FTU has been expanded and modelled by many physcicists. Hoyle in 1950 was starting the theory.
You are just argueing for no reason without any prior knowledge.
First you say its just something christians use to persuade, then you say a chemist , but really it was started by an astrophyscicist. It has nothing to do with christianity. Some christian theologists have used it.
Honestly you are not doing your argument any good. The teleological arguments is not that easy to disprove without theoretical constructs like a multiverse.
Perhaps you havent read this thread but i am agnostic not promoting one thing or another. Just pointing out there are rational arguments for god that dont comw from the bible. Even aquinas and anslem had points.
originally posted by: Woodcarver
Aquinas was a philosopher and not a scientist. Sure he made some good points about the human condition. But bring those points into the modern age and psychology does a much better job of describing the mind of a person, all without bringing god in to explain the things that aquinas could not.
originally posted by: luthier
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: luthier
No, it was a chemist, which means that he wasn't a SME on the matter.
Like I said, the problem with the idea is that it presupposes that the universe has a purpose (life), which is a complete guess because we can't know if the universe has a purpose. If one or two variable were off, these scientists are probably right, life as we know it wouldn't exist, but that doesn't mean that life in another form wouldn't exist. Heck something else entirely could exist.
This is the problem when you just google things and dont read sciwntific papers or actual theory. The FTU has been expanded and modelled by many physcicists. Hoyle in 1950 was starting the theory.
You are just argueing for no reason without any prior knowledge.
First you say its just something christians use to persuade, then you say a chemist , but really it was started by an astrophyscicist. It has nothing to do with christianity. Some christian theologists have used it.
Honestly you are not doing your argument any good. The teleological arguments is not that easy to disprove without theoretical constructs like a multiverse.
Perhaps you havent read this thread but i am agnostic not promoting one thing or another. Just pointing out there are rational arguments for god that dont comw from the bible. Even aquinas and anslem had points.
originally posted by: Woodcarver
pretty much every thing you have said.
originally posted by: AnuTyr
a reply to: Woodcarver
Whats false about it?
many belief systems have been discarded because of new evidence being found. That would be science. If you have compelling evidence then bring it to the table. But you don't even know what science is claiming. You only parrot the strawmen that others bring forth. Learn what science has proven and why it makes the claims that it does. You can't lie about scientific claims here. We are better educated than you are. I have done many of the simple experiments that you can't even explain properly.
If i believe Aliens created humanity and have proof of it. But a prior belief system ( Atheism) Holds to the belife that humans evolved from primordial soup to apes to us in a universe that is brand new. In my oppinion will these fanatics lay down their beliefs in human godom.
this again is a weird claim that i have never heard. Isn't it a common religious theme to enlighten ones self and to be as god? To emulate the positive aspects of god and to become like him?
Because if you really want me to get down to the meat and bones of what Atheism is all about. It's the belief that humans will become God.
nope. Again atheism is not trans humanism. They are completely separate things.
Atheism is a branch into Transhumanism. Because if God does not exist then that means humans can assume personified roles as God uncontested.
i could argue that since the religious majority is in control of our legislation, that perhaps they are at fault? Name an atheist president.
Which is what this society teaches. Which has lead to the climate problems we have now. Hell theres no god theres no nothing, Burn the planet to the ground, Dig its guts out. Be the greatest economic tyrant as one can be, Atheists Unite.
I could also say that it is a religious mindset that is against science that has caused these problems. Politicians making policy that allows large industries to pollute our world? Those are all christian politicians. They think their kingdom is in heaven and so they forsake and destroy this world because they believe god will just clean it up or that it is gods will.
nope. This again is a religious view. I believe it was a religious person who said "FTW let god sort it out"
It is this system that tries to treat everything like matter in motion on a collision course to self destruction leading to oblivion so who cares what happens right?