It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Rocker2013
Maybe that's just because you don't understand the importance of the issue or the consequences this will have on other countries?
And don't think the US or UK are immune from those consequences either. If Greece leaves the Euro it could cause a major problem in the markets, and cause other European nations to start to distance themselves from the Union.
Lets also not forget the meeting the Greek PM had with Putin less than a month ago. If Greece finds itself in dire need of financial help and Russia is the only one willing to lend to it, there will be a trade-off, and that will impact all of Europe, and the US, along with NATO.
originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: earthling42
The Greek economy came out of recession (just) in 2014 after the longest period of continuous economic decline of any developed country in modern history. Yet your post blamed the economic situation on the government elected in 2015.
The conditions demanded by the EU for bail out are completely unsustainable and motivated for political consumption in Germany not economics.
Where I do agree is that the best situation would be for Greece to leave the Euro. Failing that massive fiscal transfer combined with long term structural reform is the only Greece can stay in the Euro. However voters in the rest of Europe don't want hear this as they have been spoon-fed the myth of austerity being the only option for themselves so why would they accept their governments funding aid to Greece. Those lazy Greeks must be punished more (regardless that the punishments falls on the poorest and youngest, so those least responsible for the economic crisis)
Welcome to the new EU, to hell with the welfare of its citizens. Bailouts for banks not people.
originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: Flavian
You consider a 25% decline in GDP a sucesfull measure?
originally posted by: ColCurious
originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: Flavian
You consider a 25% decline in GDP a sucesfull measure?
Accoding to the criteria inherent in the centralized financial system / the present political and economic hegemony - yes.
originally posted by: earthling42
I forgot to shine a light on cutting spending during a recession.
This is certainly not prefered, to my knowledge it is keynes who taught this and in a way he is right.
However, this acyclical way of spending during a recession in order to boost the economy means that in better times during an economic boom, the spending must be cut in order to save money and lower the outstanding debt.
If however during the economic boom the policy is cyclical, by that i mean spending more, than there is no money left to spend during the recession.