It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Greathouse
originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: Greathouse
Took me 2 seconds, the first link.
www.slate.com...
For the Kyle family, then, the legal tribulations surrounding American Sniper are probably wrapping up, and Taya Kyle will likely pay some damages but walk away from the affair with many millions of dollars left to her name. (HarperCollins’ libel insurance, in fact, will cover her defamation damages.)
Look at the bold in your quote . No insurance company will ensure you for a lie. Harper's will in turn sue her for the phrase " By your knowledge do you swear all your statements are accurate to the best of your ability " .
The speculation that the insurance company will in fact pay is nothing but speculation until the check is cut .
originally posted by: notmyrealname
a reply to: Greathouse
SO you are advocating that the victim that filed a lawsuit in 2012 and had to cover all of the expenses and deal with all the public fallout should just quit because the perpetrator is dead? What about the costs to the victim who is still alive? I could see if the lawsuit left Kyle's spouse penniless however that is not the case. She is now a multi-millionaire due to a book that gained most of it's publicity on the back of lies that cost JV.
I am not advocating hurting Kyle's family however, you can't paint her as a victim in this. She certainly did not make money from what her husband did in the military or the meager life insurance policy that Kyle had from his time in service….
And the defamation lawsuit covered by insurance and the award he will win from the publisher should cover everything nicely. He should simply refuse the money offered from windows and orphans .
Or do you think it's a right to sue people every time someone claims they punched you in the nose sounds like a big sissy to me .
originally posted by: notmyrealname
a reply to: Greathouse
And the defamation lawsuit covered by insurance and the award he will win from the publisher should cover everything nicely. He should simply refuse the money offered from windows and orphans .
Two lawsuits create two legal bills. Did you win your business lawsuits that you referred to? If so, did you not claim or attempt to collect the judgement? Also it is not money offered by the 'widows and orphans' It is a judgement that was made on a case which is extremely difficult to win unless there is a major and vast preponderance of evidence. Just the fact that the case was a slam dunk should tell you who the victim really was. Stop trying to paint a personal picture here this IS a business lawsuit that we are talking about. This OP is about the main stream media making the victim into a evildoer and you are playing their tune to a tee….congratulations.
Or do you think it's a right to sue people every time someone claims they punched you in the nose sounds like a big sissy to me .
No, not unless they made a lot of money at my expense.
originally posted by: Greathouse
originally posted by: notmyrealname
a reply to: Greathouse
And the defamation lawsuit covered by insurance and the award he will win from the publisher should cover everything nicely. He should simply refuse the money offered from windows and orphans .
Two lawsuits create two legal bills. Did you win your business lawsuits that you referred to? If so, did you not claim or attempt to collect the judgement? Also it is not money offered by the 'widows and orphans' It is a judgement that was made on a case which is extremely difficult to win unless there is a major and vast preponderance of evidence. Just the fact that the case was a slam dunk should tell you who the victim really was. Stop trying to paint a personal picture here this IS a business lawsuit that we are talking about. This OP is about the main stream media making the victim into a evildoer and you are playing their tune to a tee….congratulations.
Or do you think it's a right to sue people every time someone claims they punched you in the nose sounds like a big sissy to me .
No, not unless they made a lot of money at my expense.
So to sum up your position you're OK with suing widows and orphans ?
originally posted by: notmyrealname
originally posted by: Greathouse
originally posted by: notmyrealname
a reply to: Greathouse
And the defamation lawsuit covered by insurance and the award he will win from the publisher should cover everything nicely. He should simply refuse the money offered from windows and orphans .
Two lawsuits create two legal bills. Did you win your business lawsuits that you referred to? If so, did you not claim or attempt to collect the judgement? Also it is not money offered by the 'widows and orphans' It is a judgement that was made on a case which is extremely difficult to win unless there is a major and vast preponderance of evidence. Just the fact that the case was a slam dunk should tell you who the victim really was. Stop trying to paint a personal picture here this IS a business lawsuit that we are talking about. This OP is about the main stream media making the victim into a evildoer and you are playing their tune to a tee….congratulations.
Or do you think it's a right to sue people every time someone claims they punched you in the nose sounds like a big sissy to me .
No, not unless they made a lot of money at my expense.
So to sum up your position you're OK with suing widows and orphans ?
Generally I agree with you on many things however I have to state that this is the dumbest comment I have ever read from you.
originally posted by: Greathouse
originally posted by: notmyrealname
originally posted by: Greathouse
originally posted by: notmyrealname
a reply to: Greathouse
And the defamation lawsuit covered by insurance and the award he will win from the publisher should cover everything nicely. He should simply refuse the money offered from windows and orphans .
Two lawsuits create two legal bills. Did you win your business lawsuits that you referred to? If so, did you not claim or attempt to collect the judgement? Also it is not money offered by the 'widows and orphans' It is a judgement that was made on a case which is extremely difficult to win unless there is a major and vast preponderance of evidence. Just the fact that the case was a slam dunk should tell you who the victim really was. Stop trying to paint a personal picture here this IS a business lawsuit that we are talking about. This OP is about the main stream media making the victim into a evildoer and you are playing their tune to a tee….congratulations.
Or do you think it's a right to sue people every time someone claims they punched you in the nose sounds like a big sissy to me .
No, not unless they made a lot of money at my expense.
So to sum up your position you're OK with suing widows and orphans ?
Generally I agree with you on many things however I have to state that this is the dumbest comment I have ever read from you.
Potato
his career was thriving until the book's publication but afterward work started to dry up, with a TV show on conspiracy theories that he had hosted for three seasons not being renewed for a fourth.
www.newsmax.com...
www.theatlantic.com...
"It's clear they're doing everything they can to make it a failure so they don't have to renew it," Ventura said when he appeared on The Alex Jones Show's Infowars
They've chosen not to air it. TruTV, the network did. Who influenced truTV to do that, I do not know."
originally posted by: notmyrealname
a reply to: Greathouse
And the defamation lawsuit covered by insurance and the award he will win from the publisher should cover everything nicely. He should simply refuse the money offered from windows and orphans .
Two lawsuits create two legal bills. Did you win your business lawsuits that you referred to? If so, did you not claim or attempt to collect the judgement? Also it is not money offered by the 'widows and orphans' It is a judgement that was made on a case which is extremely difficult to win unless there is a major and vast preponderance of evidence. Just the fact that the case was a slam dunk should tell you who the victim really was. Stop trying to paint a personal picture here this IS a business lawsuit that we are talking about. This OP is about the main stream media making the victim into a evildoer and you are playing their tune to a tee….congratulations.
Or do you think it's a right to sue people every time someone claims they punched you in the nose sounds like a big sissy to me .
No, not unless they made a lot of money at my expense.
In the United States, defamation cases are extremely difficult to win, thanks to the First Amendment. When allegedly defamatory statements pertain to a public figure, the plaintiff mustn’t just prove those statements were false. He has to prove the defendant made those statements with “actual malice”—that is, knowledge that they were false or with “reckless disregard” for their falsity. Very few defamation plaintiffs can make it over the high bar of actual malice.
CONCLUSION This case was tried to a jury and the Court from July 8, 2014 , to July 22 , 2014 . On July 29, 2014, upon agreement by the parties, the jury returned a divided verdict of eight to two as follows:
1. Did Plaintiff Jesse Ventura prove his claim of defamation against Ch ris Kyle? (See Jury Instruction Nos. 8, 8A, 8B, 8C.) X YES _____NO
2. What amount of money, if any, will fairly and adequately compensate Plaintiff Jesse Ventura for damages directly caused by the defamation? (See Jury Instruction Nos. 12 and 13 for the means of determining damages.) $ 500,000 .00
3. Did Plaintiff Jesse Ventura prove his claim of appropriation against Chris Kyle? (See Jury Instruction No. 9.) _____ YES X NO
4. What amount of money, if any, wi ll fairly and adequately compensate Plaintiff Jesse Ventura for damages directly caused by the appropriation? (See Jury Instruction No. 13 for the means of determining damages.) $_____________________
5. Did Plaintiff Jesse Ventura prove his claim of unjust enrichment against Chris Kyle and the Defendant Estate? (See Jury Instruction No. 10.) X YES _____NO
6. By what amount of money, if any, has the Defendant Estate been unjustly enriched? (See Jury Instruction No. 13 for the means of determining damages.) $ 1,345,477.25
i read he documents and skdo listened to interviews with the jurors who were initially hung before they were told ti com back with a verdict.?you only have part of the stiry.
originally posted by: diggindirt
a reply to: NavyDoc
Did you read the actual document on the case? www.nolapatent.com...
CONCLUSION This case was tried to a jury and the Court from July 8, 2014 , to July 22 , 2014 . On July 29, 2014, upon agreement by the parties, the jury returned a divided verdict of eight to two as follows:
1. Did Plaintiff Jesse Ventura prove his claim of defamation against Ch ris Kyle? (See Jury Instruction Nos. 8, 8A, 8B, 8C.) X YES _____NO
2. What amount of money, if any, will fairly and adequately compensate Plaintiff Jesse Ventura for damages directly caused by the defamation? (See Jury Instruction Nos. 12 and 13 for the means of determining damages.) $ 500,000 .00
3. Did Plaintiff Jesse Ventura prove his claim of appropriation against Chris Kyle? (See Jury Instruction No. 9.) _____ YES X NO
4. What amount of money, if any, wi ll fairly and adequately compensate Plaintiff Jesse Ventura for damages directly caused by the appropriation? (See Jury Instruction No. 13 for the means of determining damages.) $_____________________
5. Did Plaintiff Jesse Ventura prove his claim of unjust enrichment against Chris Kyle and the Defendant Estate? (See Jury Instruction No. 10.) X YES _____NO
6. By what amount of money, if any, has the Defendant Estate been unjustly enriched? (See Jury Instruction No. 13 for the means of determining damages.) $ 1,345,477.25
I'm not sure where you got your info but "eight to two" certainly doesn't support your statement. Reading the newspaper accounts doesn't equal reading the actual documents. If you have official documents which support your opinions please post some links. Thanks.
originally posted by: Greathouse
Potato