It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Planned Parenthood Sells Dead Baby Parts

page: 25
120
<< 22  23  24    26  27  28 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 14 2015 @ 09:59 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

OP isn't about the nature of abortion though is it?

It's about the commoditization of it.




posted on Jul, 14 2015 @ 10:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66

MORE REALITY: About 50% of all fertilized eggs are spontaneously aborted by the mother's body.


So because someone "dies" of a heart attack at the age of 98, it's the same as killing someone at the age of 30.

Because, you know, they both are dead.



posted on Jul, 14 2015 @ 10:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: reldra
It is the costs incurred to deliver a viable specimen. Please look at the law that governs this, it allows for that.


Reldra, it's a non-profit. Everything is done "at cost". By your reasoning, a non-profit could sell body parts at whatever price they can justify to cover their overhead. That overhead can be adjusted quite high if the baby part business is booming. More money for the administrators. This is the oldest trick in the non-profit book. Hell, there are even marijuana dispensaries that operate as "non profits", and yet their owners pocket substantial salaries.



posted on Jul, 14 2015 @ 10:03 PM
link   
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

www.independent.co.uk...
bitchmagazine.org...

yes, we do!!!!


edit on 14-7-2015 by dawnstar because: (no reason given)

edit on 14-7-2015 by dawnstar because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 14 2015 @ 10:03 PM
link   
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

Is the fetus still removed from the body?



posted on Jul, 14 2015 @ 10:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
LOGICAL QUESTION: How can the same act be HEINOUS DISGUSTING MURDER in one context and NOT MURDER in other exactly similar circumstances?


LOGICAL ANSWER: The same way a man killed deliberately by a sane person can be treated differently if the assailant in insane, or had a difficult upbringing, or was antagonized by the victim, and so on. Circumstances matter. Is that really the point you were trying to make?



posted on Jul, 14 2015 @ 10:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: kosmicjack
a reply to: Gryphon66

OP isn't about the nature of abortion though is it?

It's about the commoditization of it.


OP is a farce.

Lies are also "sins."

There is nothing here about the "commoditization" of abortion. Except perhaps those making money from being "professionally opposed."

Fetuses "die" from choice, or from choice based on means of fertilization.

Yes, that's mainline hypocrisy.



posted on Jul, 14 2015 @ 10:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: kosmicjack
a reply to: Gryphon66

OP isn't about the nature of abortion though is it?

It's about the commoditization of it.


Let's not forget that abortion rates are going down, not up. If PP is in the business of making MORE profit through abortions, they aren't succeeding. Planned Parenthood is, in fact, primarily in the business of helping people prevent unwanted pregnancies, not encouraging them to have unwanted pregnancies so they can make money off the abortions.



posted on Jul, 14 2015 @ 10:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: beezzer

originally posted by: Gryphon66

MORE REALITY: About 50% of all fertilized eggs are spontaneously aborted by the mother's body.


So because someone "dies" of a heart attack at the age of 98, it's the same as killing someone at the age of 30.

Because, you know, they both are dead.


Nope. Not at all. That's ridiculous.

However, a spontaneous abortion and an abortion procedure result in EXACTLY the same outcome.



posted on Jul, 14 2015 @ 10:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: Guidance.Is.Internal

originally posted by: Gryphon66
LOGICAL QUESTION: How can the same act be HEINOUS DISGUSTING MURDER in one context and NOT MURDER in other exactly similar circumstances?


LOGICAL ANSWER: The same way a man killed deliberately by a sane person can be treated differently if the assailant in insane, or had a difficult upbringing, or was antagonized by the victim, and so on. Circumstances matter. Is that really the point you were trying to make?


Do you really think such an obvious attempt to muddy the water will make a difference?

Anti-choice folks in this discussion have stated that abortion in the case of rape, incest or danger to mother is understandable if not okay. It is still abortion. Still the same process. Still the same outcome.

To claim these same processes with the same outcomes are different based on belief is ultimately hypocritical.

Yes indeed.



posted on Jul, 14 2015 @ 10:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: beezzer

originally posted by: Gryphon66

MORE REALITY: About 50% of all fertilized eggs are spontaneously aborted by the mother's body.


So because someone "dies" of a heart attack at the age of 98, it's the same as killing someone at the age of 30.

Because, you know, they both are dead.


Nope. Not at all. That's ridiculous.

However, a spontaneous abortion and an abortion procedure result in EXACTLY the same outcome.


The same way manslaughter and murder have the same "outcome", yet are treated differently by the legal system.



posted on Jul, 14 2015 @ 10:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: Verum1quaere
a reply to: beezzer

have hope! we are living in a fallen world, full of corruption… the Bible tells us not to love this world for a reason…it is but a vapor compared to eternity.


Nice thought but the wrong kind of hope.

You should be able to see clearly that ALL is fallen, eternity or not.



posted on Jul, 14 2015 @ 10:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
Do you really think such an obvious attempt to muddy the water will make a difference?

Anti-choice folks in this discussion have stated that abortion in the case of rape, incest or danger to mother is understandable if not okay. It is still abortion. Still the same process. Still the same outcome.

To claim these same processes with the same outcomes are different based on belief is ultimately hypocritical.

Yes indeed.


So you do not acknowledge that circumstances can be used to weigh the morality of an action. Ok, just checking.



posted on Jul, 14 2015 @ 10:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: Guidance.Is.Internal

So you do not acknowledge that circumstances can be used to weigh the morality of an action. Ok, just checking.


Nice strawman.

I stated what I stated. You are attempting to twist that into the argument you want me to make. BS /shrug



posted on Jul, 14 2015 @ 10:12 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

do you also view shooting some while robbing a store the same as shooting someone who is entering you home with the intent to kill you as being the same,
I mean the end result is still the same?



posted on Jul, 14 2015 @ 10:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66

MORE REALITY: About 50% of all fertilized eggs are spontaneously aborted by the mother's body.



fertilized eggs don't have marketable parts and organs




posted on Jul, 14 2015 @ 10:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: beezzer

originally posted by: Gryphon66

MORE REALITY: About 50% of all fertilized eggs are spontaneously aborted by the mother's body.


So because someone "dies" of a heart attack at the age of 98, it's the same as killing someone at the age of 30.

Because, you know, they both are dead.


Nope. Not at all. That's ridiculous.

However, a spontaneous abortion and an abortion procedure result in EXACTLY the same outcome.


Outcomes are the same, the actions leading up to then aren't.

Here, grasp at some more straws.



posted on Jul, 14 2015 @ 10:14 PM
link   
a reply to: butcherguy

In all seriousness Butcher, thank you for keeping it very real.

As unpleasant as that is, they deserve nothing less.

Thank You Sir.



posted on Jul, 14 2015 @ 10:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic

originally posted by: reldra
a reply to: beezzer Lucky for you, you will never face this decision.



And unfortunately for every woman, those making the majority of the laws on abortion will never have to face the decision. If men had the babies, abortion would have ALWAYS been a legal CHOICE.



You seem pretty dam sure of yourself on these topics.

I am pretty dam sure you are saying that every woman considers these thoughts in their minds, whenever they are pregnant, and has to "Face this Decision".

Why is it apparent that this decision seems to be all too front and center ??

And how come almost every woman I have known, that has MADE this decision was not raped, not forced, and is even more of a wreck after the fact, and most of them barely care about the other children they have.

IS IT NOT, better to actually take the choice AWAY by sterilizing ???

Why not go down this path ?? You think its better that everyone "Face this decision" ??



posted on Jul, 14 2015 @ 10:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: Gryphon66

do you also view shooting some while robbing a store the same as shooting someone who is entering you home with the intent to kill you as being the same,
I mean the end result is still the same?


If a person dies in both shootings, yes, the outcomes are the same: a human is dead.

How one justifies human death is based on one's beliefs.

If you are "pro-life" ... doesn't the death of a human for any reason trouble you equally?

If not, you're proving the point I am making.




top topics



 
120
<< 22  23  24    26  27  28 >>

log in

join