It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Problem is, I also read that the deal didn't require Iran to allow inspectors in.
International inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) will not only be continuously monitoring every element of Iran’s declared nuclear program, but they will also be verifying that no fissile material is covertly carted off to a secret location to build a bomb. And if IAEA inspectors become aware of a suspicious location, Iran has agreed to implement the Additional Protocol to their IAEA Safeguards Agreement, which will allow inspectors to access and inspect any site they deem suspicious.
So while you're insinuating that Israel will use them because they don't allow inspections, just know neither did Iran.
Newly declassified documents reveal that Israel nearly made use of its nuclear weapons during the fateful opening days of the Yom Kippur War in 1973, Israel’s Yediot Ahronot reported on Thursday. On the second day of the war, as Syrian and Egyptian forces were overcoming the sparse and surprised Israeli defenders, Defense Minister Moshe Dayan suggested the use of nuclear weapons in a secretive meeting with Prime Minister Golda Meir.
What was all the evil stuff Iran has done to recently to be labeled such a 'bad country'.
That means this deal is not built on trust. It is built on verification. Inspectors will have 24/7 access to Iran’s nuclear facilities. (transcript)
TRUTH: … Negotiators failed to meet the standard of achieving “anytime, anywhere” access that several members of the United States Congress had demanded as a part of any nuclear deal. Instead, in the event Iran objects to an IAEA request for access to a specific site, a “clock” will begin that grants the two sides 14 days to negotiate.
We means the United States. What did we do to prevent this farce of a deal from happening? Answer: is forthcoming from Congress. If they approve. We have chosen Dishonor!
originally posted by: TonyS
originally posted by: PGTWEED
As I have observed about this Nuclear deal. Future Generations will speak of the USA the way we speak of the lost continent of Atlantis. We chose Dishonor. We will get War.
You expected something different from a country that elected Obama to the White Hut.....not once, but twice?
And BTW, "we" didn't choose Dishonor......the "America" that put Obama in the White Hut chose Dishonor.
Too bad It won't. This entire deal is based on lies.
originally posted by: buster2010
originally posted by: PGTWEED
As I have observed about this Nuclear deal. Future Generations will speak of the USA the way we speak of the lost continent of Atlantis. We chose Dishonor. We will get War.
There is nothing more dishonorable than starting a war based on lies. This agreement is to stop another useless war from starting.
originally posted by: PGTWEED
We means the United States. What did we do to prevent this farce of a deal from happening? Answer: is forthcoming from Congress. If they approve. We have chosen Dishonor!
originally posted by: TonyS
originally posted by: PGTWEED
As I have observed about this Nuclear deal. Future Generations will speak of the USA the way we speak of the lost continent of Atlantis. We chose Dishonor. We will get War.
You expected something different from a country that elected Obama to the White Hut.....not once, but twice?
And BTW, "we" didn't choose Dishonor......the "America" that put Obama in the White Hut chose Dishonor.
originally posted by: links234
a reply to: yuppa
What? Of course the president can veto this. It's not a treaty, it's a resolution. If congress passes a resolution of disapproval to attempt to block the lifting of sanctions then the president can veto that resolution so the sanctions are lifted.
Congress has 60 days from the moment the president gives them the details of the agreement to issue a resolution of approval or disapproval.
The basic thing we want you to take away from this is the difference between a treaty (which has to be approved by the Senate) and an executive agreement (a treaty-except-not-officially-called-that which doesn't have to be approved by the Senate but that sometimes Congress gets to vote on.)
Zarif emphasized that if the current negotiation with P5+1 result in a Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, it will not be a bilateral agreement between Iran and the US, but rather one that will be concluded with the participation of five other countries, including all permanent members of the Security Council, and will also be endorsed by a Security Council resolution.
Zarif expressed the hope that his comments “may enrich the knowledge of the authors to recognize that according to international law, Congress may not modify the terms of the agreement at any time as they claim, and if Congress adopts any measure to impede its implementation, it will have committed a material breach of US obligations.
...
The Foreign Minister also informed the authors that majority of US international agreements in recent decades are in fact what the signatories describe as “mere executive agreements” and not treaties ratified by the Senate.
He reminded them that “their letter in fact undermines the credibility of thousands of such mere executive agreements that have been or will be entered into by the US with various other governments.
originally posted by: DeusImperator
Japan would have fallen eventualy,
Now about this Iran agreement; I dont really see the problem, its a beautifull country and considering what its neighbours are doing the world should focus on them and not the Iranians.
originally posted by: cavtrooper7
a reply to: SubTruth
I am afraid we will see Israel pull another OSIRAK type mission, THE MOMENT Iran denies one inspection.
AND THEY WILL.
originally posted by: haman10
originally posted by: cavtrooper7
a reply to: SubTruth
I am afraid we will see Israel pull another OSIRAK type mission, THE MOMENT Iran denies one inspection.
AND THEY WILL.
Oh they should spare us from their wrath . Osirak type of mission and they'll get an H3 type of mission on their end .
the time when someone could bully Iran has ended . US foreign minister was outside his country for a month begging for a deal . it was the longest mission of a US FM ever in history .
hold on to your horses hon , we want peace , but hey , #NeverThreatenAnIranian .