It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: RobinB022
a reply to: DenyObfuscation
Do you not find that premise to be ridiculous?
Perhaps, but as I said I'm no scientist.
I also find all of the experiments on innocent people in the past to be quite ridiculous.. but they happened.
originally posted by: realeyesreallies
a reply to: waynos
Care to elaborate how they do not relate specifically? Denial is simple. What does Chemtrail mean to you?
So you believe it could not be duplicated? No way that an experiment perhaps of your smart design could prove this simple reaction to put a rest to the controversy?
Why is there still so much controversy? I believe that neither have proven their point without question with an edge going to Geoengineering programs.
Who said anything about using a person at 30,000 feet?
I'm talking "simple" and in scale to a reasonable level. A person or persons will create vapor in a small condensed area at -30, if what above can occur daily all day in a huge sky then a small persistent vapor cloud out of a person or persons should be enough to say hey. It may happen.
What I would rather read are actions taken to validate or prove otherwise vrs the typical go no where debates. If it is what people who pass it off as normal is then lets see these crazy persistent clouds recreated in real time and this debate ended.
It's not an opinion. It's physics.
Your entitled to your opinion but In this case I don't buy it.
Perhaps an issue of trust. Perhaps it's time for a publicly funded test.
originally posted by: soulpowertothendegree
I am 52 years old and these things have not been around all my life, they just began in the last 10 to 15 years with regularity.
If they were all normal then they would have been around all my life.