It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
So, you are claiming that NYC Firemen "don't know WTF was going on" because "they were in the Marriott" and they "mistook the collapse of WTC 2" as an explosion??
Where do you people come up with this stuff? Are you serious??
Craig Carlsen said that he and other firefighters “heard explosions coming from . . . the south tower (WTC 2). . . . There were about ten explosions. At the time I didn't realize what it was. We realized later after talking and finding out that it was the floors collapsing to where the plane had hit.
Good videos very convincing. When you put aside all the israeli involvement in the execution of the 911 attacks these videos are quite convincing good find
WTC Pre-Collapse Bowing Debunks 9/11 "Controlled Demolition" Theory
Indications of the Imminent Collapse
of the World Trade Center Buildings
Disprove Explosives Theory
Scientists investigating the Sept. 11, 2001 collapse of the twin towers said, "the World Trade Center towers showed telltale signs they were about to collapse several minutes before each crumbled to the ground." There would not be telltale signs if it was explosives (Controlled Demolition) that caused the buildings to collapse.
"In the case of the north tower, police chopper pilots reported seeing the warning signs - an inward bowing of the building facade - at least eight minutes before it collapsed at 10:29 a.m." New York Daily News reporter Paul Shin wrote in his June 19th, 2004 article 9/11 cops saw collapse coming.
"Federal engineering investigators studying the destruction of the World Trade Center's twin towers on Sept. 11 said New York Police Department aviation units reported an inward bowing of the buildings' columns in the minutes before they collapsed, a signal they were about to fall." - NYC Police Saw Sign of Tower Collapse, Study Says
originally posted by: admirethedistance
I hear a (relatively) faint noise, that would be consistent with the internal support structure of a building buckling. I hear nothing that remotely sounds like an explosion. Is that the best 'truthers' can come up with?
The camera is a good distance away. Explosions are not caught on audio equipment as good as people think especially since they are set up to record nearby noises most of the time
The camera is a good distance away. Explosions are not caught on audio equipment as good as people think especially since they are set up to record nearby noises most of the time. Thats why recorded conversation in NYC is not drowned out by the city noises like traffic.
How does it prove me wrong?
The explosions are hardly surprising the cameras have been set up to record them.
I posted a video with very faint noises the reporter describes as explosions, so yes you have to set it up in a way that it records ambient noise to capture them properly.
To sum it up, there is no case for demolition explosives at ground zero.
Simple! Explosions make a lot of noise that can be heard for miles.
There is plenty, but you have to look at it, the joke called the investigation never looked for it, that is a fact.
You don't have to look for evidence of demolition explosives because there was no sound of demolition explosions on the WTC videos nor were demolition explosions detected by seismic monitors. In fact, no evidence of demolition explosives was ever recovered from the rubble of the WTC buildings. To sum it up, there is no case for demolition explosives at ground zero.