It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
4000 years of history wiped out by five SCOTUS Judges
The oldest Codex of Law is the Hammurabi Code of law written about 600 years before the of Moses.
originally posted by: kitzik
a reply to: MrSpad
Christian Emperors who enforced a law that when two men are married they have to as equals with neither playing the roll of the submissive women or be burned alive.
This is distortion of what was this law about, it is not about "marriage" it is about prohibiting homosexuality. A first step from a permissive customs ( again not marriages) of pagan Rome towards intolerant Christian ethics.
You may find quotes like this
etc etc
Martial, the first-century A.D. Roman poet, reports incidences of male-male marriage as kinds of perversions, but not uncommon perversions, speaking in one epigram (I.24) of a man who “played the bride yesterday.” In another (12.42) he says mockingly, “Bearded Callistratus gave himself in marriage to…Afer, in the manner in which a virgin usually gives herself in marriage to a male. The torches shone in front, the bridal veils covered his face, and wedding toasts were not absent, either. A dowry was also named. Does that not seem enough yet for you, Rome? Are you waiting for him to give birth?”
But, please find me some legalese language of Roman marriage laws concerning "same sex marriage" There is nothing.
You know that just a month or so ago, "Pride parades" existed and homosexuals were not exactly hiding and beaten to death, yet something changed after Supreme Court legislation. And this something or similar to this never occurred before.
originally posted by: ChesterJohn
The oldest Codex of Law is the Hammurabi Code of law written about 600 years before the of Moses.
It would also seem under the Hammurabi Code of Laws that marriage was between a man and a woman. we can see this in the fact that no marriage between same sex was mentioned and wife is always presented as a her which is a female of the species. Her and Him are gneder specifics of the law. These laws were also copied by the Quran and the Hadiths
originally posted by: Shadow Herder
Confusing. If you go to the park and see a male dog trying to mount another male you think, stupid dogs they don't know whats right. How about two male ducks trying to have a life together, you would think... what a waste of time.
But its different for us more 'complicated' humans. Its the truth.
originally posted by: ChesterJohn
a reply to: redhorse
you miss the point Marriage historically has been between one man and one woman never ever in any ancient society was same sex marriage ever allowed or legalizes
Same-sex marriage was outlawed on December 16, 342 AD by the Christian emperors Constantius II and Constans. This law specifically outlaws marriages between men and reads as follows: When a man “marries” in the manner of a woman, a “woman” about to renounce men, what does he wish, when sex has lost its significance; when the crime is one which it is not profitable to know; when Venus is changed into another form; when love is sought and not found? We order the statutes to arise, the laws to be armed with an avenging sword, that those infamous persons who are now, or who hereafter may be, guilty may be subjected to exquisite punishment. (Theodosian Code 9.7.3)
Such ceremonies can be found in the history of the Catholic Church up until the 14th century and in the Eastern Orthodox Church up until the 18th century. Documented in Byzantine manuscripts from the ninth to the fifteenth centuries, prayers established participants as "'spiritual brothers' (pneumatikous adelphous) and contained references to sainted pairs, including most notably SS Sergius and Bacchus, who were famous for their friendship."
In late medieval France, it is possible the practice of entering a legal contract of "enbrotherment" (affrèrement) provided a vehicle for civil unions between unrelated male adults who pledged to live together sharing ‘un pain, un vin, et une bourse’ – one bread, one wine, and one purse. This legal category may represent one of the earliest forms of sanctioned same-sex unions.
originally posted by: Shadow Herder
Confusing. If you go to the park and see a male dog trying to mount another male you think, stupid dogs they don't know whats right. How about two male ducks trying to have a life together, you would think... what a waste of time.
But its different for us more 'complicated' humans. Its the truth.
originally posted by: Jonjonj
originally posted by: kitzik
a reply to: boymonkey74
The burden of proof is all on you. We have many remaining laws about marriage and it never mentions a marriage between man and man.
The bible hasn't even got the testicles to call sexxx by its real name, it is all about lying with such, laying down with such, begetting and there is no f!%@ing at all. The only real f"@$, and it is one of the mind, is what happened to Maria(y), while she was asleep. C'mon guys, take it for what it is and move on.
originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: ChesterJohn
Oh, yea, you are right, but see the laws that man created so the man can rewrite them, back in ancient times civil rights of human beings were not recognized as death by actions was the norm, so in the same way that written laws in ancient times allowed one human being to had the right to kill another so now that under the new written laws is a crime
I guess everybody have a way to interpret the laws that man created depending on their agendas.
Do all a favor and come back to modern times in the 21 first century