It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: SubTruth
a reply to: Phage
Listen if it turns out anyone can just report a death to this database my argument is lost.......If only doctors can report deaths to this database my argument is sound.
I am trying to figure this out myself..........
Canada had roughly 1,500 vials of vaccine made for clinical trials before the 2014 Ebola outbreak began in West Africa.
originally posted by: MonkeyFishFrog
a reply to: SubTruth
That's not true. Canada was already one of the leading countries in Ebola research.
Canada had roughly 1,500 vials of vaccine made for clinical trials before the 2014 Ebola outbreak began in West Africa.
Clinical trials proposals were being written when the outbreak did. Any delay wasn't on the WHO part but Canada's because up until that point it was only tested on animals.
Do you even read what I post........That is why I said even "if" 20% end up being correct it is a big deal. Do doctors make mistakes.....YEP. Is that 20% a hard fact......NOPE.
Doctors are expected by management to push vaccinations.......This is a fact. I see huge conflict of interests with this entire industry including regulation.
Doctors take Hippocratic oaths and will recommend things that are good for you such as vaccines and that would not be a conflict of interest.
originally posted by: jaws1975
a reply to: SubTruth
Props for taking on the gang in a clearly pro Vax thread. The agenda here is clear for anyone with eyes to see.
I don't argue the science with these people, because the Rockefeller based sciences have been skewed for a long time. As you have seen, anything that questions their agenda is baseless and unfounded. It's really an impressive racket that Rockefeller and his crony globalist created.
As long as I have the right not to vaccinate me and mine with tainted medicine, I could give 2 turds what names people call me.
You don't argue the science because you don't argue the science, pure & simple.
originally posted by: jaws1975
I don't argue the science because I know that's your honey trap.
It's an appeal to authority that I don't subscribe to pure and simple.
It's important to note that this fallacy should not be used to dismiss the claims of experts, or scientific consensus. Appeals to authority are not valid arguments, but nor is it reasonable to disregard the claims of experts who have a demonstrated depth of knowledge unless one has a similar level of understanding and/or access to empirical evidence. However it is, entirely possible that the opinion of a person or institution of authority is wrong; therefore the authority that such a person or institution holds does not have any intrinsic bearing upon whether their claims are true or not.
That's a convenient excuse for not having to substantiate your claims.
originally posted by: jaws1975
I don't have to substantiate anything
I'll ask you the same question do you think there should be mandatory vaccinations on every healthy man, woman and child?
originally posted by: jaws1975
a reply to: Pardon?
You don't argue the science because you don't argue the science, pure & simple.
I don't argue the science because I know that's your honey trap. It's an appeal to authority that I don't subscribe to pure and simple.
Question, do you support forced vaccinations for every healthy man, woman and child?
If you don't argue the science then why argue about a subject solely based on science?
originally posted by: jaws1975
a reply to: Pardon?
If you don't argue the science then why argue about a subject solely based on science?
It's solely based on phony science for you, for others like the above poster the proof is right in front of their face. Vaccines can and do injure people, hopefully people can see through the smokescreen of corrupted science. Peace out.