It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: notmyrealname
a reply to: Annee
I do not think the legislation will change a bigot's mind on any particular subject. Some people will just hate because that is all they know.
originally posted by: notmyrealname
a reply to: roadgravel
So when do we toss them all?
originally posted by: notmyrealname
I do think that they are mutually exclusive; one marrying party and two registering authority. Registering party had the responsibility to maintain the ledger. Church marriages are a figment of your imagination just as are marriage licenses so, let's not travel there. Also if it weren't for the government stealing from you vial various taxes, there would be no talk of marriage benefits v/s single benefits.
originally posted by: notmyrealname
originally posted by: Gryphon66
*crickets*
Sorry but your comments could not keep me up all night...
originally posted by: Gryphon66
Ahhh ... this starts to make sense now.
These particular beating drum has its source in an article from earlier this year, January 2015, from the well-known hate group American Family Association:
Ginsburg and Kagan Must Recuse Themselves on Gay Marriage Case
The problem with their argument (the Justices performing weddings) is that marriage equality existed in the District of Columbia since 2009.
/shrug