It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: introvert
Of course. They bring it on themselves. The gay marriage issue, the abortion issue, the creationism taught in schools issue are all examples of Christians trying to unfairly push themselves and their beliefs onto others then acting all surprised and feigning persecution when they get staunch blow back.
originally posted by: Logarock
Well considering that you pointed out the purposeful ambiguity of the term God on federal reserve issues, and in this context certainly, you got some gall trying to rake truth because she/he holds it like every other religion as talking about their God.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Logarock
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: theabsolutetruth
Well when you try to rewrite history with lies, I'm going to call you on it. The nation isn't a Christian nation. It ISN'T a theocracy no matter how much you believe it to be. Christians have just successfully pushed their religion into government where it doesn't belong in the past. Rulings like the OP are just fixing those mistakes.
The question is was it founded a christian nation......saying yes for the very large part is not a LIE. Anyone one coming here then would describe the culture as christian even if only in form. Thats an historical fact. I have only to point to Alexander de Tocqueville.
No, it wasn't founded as a Christian Nation. It was founded as a Nation of Christians. I already posted links earlier in the thread that went over this.
originally posted by: Logarock
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Logarock
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: theabsolutetruth
Well when you try to rewrite history with lies, I'm going to call you on it. The nation isn't a Christian nation. It ISN'T a theocracy no matter how much you believe it to be. Christians have just successfully pushed their religion into government where it doesn't belong in the past. Rulings like the OP are just fixing those mistakes.
The question is was it founded a christian nation......saying yes for the very large part is not a LIE. Anyone one coming here then would describe the culture as christian even if only in form. Thats an historical fact. I have only to point to Alexander de Tocqueville.
No, it wasn't founded as a Christian Nation. It was founded as a Nation of Christians. I already posted links earlier in the thread that went over this.
It was culturally christian, had the strong unavoidable flavor of Christianity. Cant get around that.
I personally never said, and boy do I get tired of saying that to you, that it was founded a Christian nation.
We need to achieve the TRULY secular government that our founding fathers envisioned
More than 70% of Americans identify as Christians.
The answer to all of these questions is no. The U.S. Constitution is a wholly secular document. It contains no mention of Christianity or Jesus Christ. In fact, the Constitution refers to religion only twice in the First Amendment, which bars laws "respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," and in Article VI, which prohibits "religious tests" for public office. Both of these provisions are evidence that the country was not founded as officially Christian.
The Founding Fathers did not create a secular government because they disliked religion. Many were believers themselves. Yet they were well aware of the dangers of church-state union. They had studied and even seen first-hand the difficulties that church-state partnerships spawned in Europe. During the American colonial period, alliances between religion and government produced oppression and tyranny on our own shores.
originally posted by: Spiramirabilis
The Founding Fathers did not create a secular government because they disliked religion. Many were believers themselves. Yet they were well aware of the dangers of church-state union.
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Yes, and they're going to spread all kinds of fear mongering as their boat sinks. Fear is an incredibly powerful weapon and motivator. Fear brings people together and mobilizes people in ways other emotions can't.
Is it just me or does the Democratic part seem almost "centrist" these days when compared to the Republican party? The conservatives have gotten so extremely right-wing in the last 8 years since Obama that mainstream Democrats seem ... well, almost "middle of the road".
Sure, there are some really whacked-out left-wing types, but the majority of mainstream Democrat politicians seem almost middle of the road by comparison today.
I don't think this is just coincidence. When a group of people feels threatened they tend to draw themselves closer together and unite under emotionally powerful ideologies. The right-wing conservatives/Christians are becoming more extreme in their views in order to mobilize as many of their followers as possible -- this includes the fear mongering I mentioned earlier.
As they continue to loose power, we're going to see crazier and crazier things said. Many people who once considered themselves right-of-center are going to have to choose whether or not to drink the Republican Kool-Aid and go headfirst into radicalism.
Yup, that's what's happening. Christians are becoming radicalized in this country due to their shrinking political influence. It's not pretty, and it's only helping turn more and more people away from their congregations.
originally posted by: Willtell
Don’t worry folks this will all be settled when the Satanists demand equal billing by the state.
Then the religious Christians will cease this tendency to want to display their religious symbols on government property
The concept of the original constitution writers is a sublime one: trying to be even handed regards religion and not ever let one dominate the political landscape.
It amazes me why people can’t understand that
By doing this they protect all of our rights
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: Logarock
Well considering that you pointed out the purposeful ambiguity of the term God on federal reserve issues, and in this context certainly, you got some gall trying to rake truth because she/he holds it like every other religion as talking about their God.
Why would someone's PERSONAL interpretation be used to force it upon others?
Do you not even understand at the most simplistic level how the First Amendment functions?
originally posted by: Logarock
I have only to point to Alexander de Tocqueville.
See you guys are getting some stiff resistance and the crap adjectives start flying.