World Trade Center 7 Explosion and Controlled Collaspe Caught on Tape.

15 Disturbing 9/11 Facts You'll Wish Weren't True



Bizarre facts and strange activities transpired before, during and after September 11th 2001.

4,010,114 viewers
38,744 Likes

a reply to: PublicOpinion

A few months ago we already talked about Iraq.

Did the U.S. go to war with Iraq after the 1993 bombing of WTC 1, whereas, one of the terrorist fled to Iraq, and then, to Pakistan?

If you look at the record, the person who concocted that story about WMD in Iraq was an Iraqi, code named: "Curveball," not the United States. The UN and the United States had the authority to go back into Iraq after Iraq violated 16 UN resolutions. In fact, I was surprised at the demonstrated restraint by the United States in light of Iraq's violation of the UN resolutions.

Saddam Hussein's Defiance of United Nations Resolutions

Saddam Hussein has repeatedly violated sixteen United Nations Security Council Resolutions (UNSCRs) designed to ensure that Iraq does not pose a threat to international peace and security. In addition to these repeated violations, he has tried, over the past decade, to circumvent UN economic sanctions against Iraq, which are reflected in a number of other resolutions.


UNSCR 678 - November 29, 1990

Iraq must comply fully with UNSCR 660 (regarding Iraq's illegal invasion of Kuwait) "and all subsequent relevant resolutions."
Authorizes UN Member States "to use all necessary means to uphold and implement resolution 660 and all subsequent relevant resolutions and to restore international peace and security in the area."

UNSCR 1134 - October 23, 1997

* Condemns repeated refusal of Iraqi authorities to allow access" to UN inspectors, which constitutes a "flagrant violation" of UNSCR 687, 707, 715, and 1060.

* Iraq must cooperate fully with UN weapons inspectors and allow immediate, unconditional and unrestricted access.

* Iraq must give immediate, unconditional and unrestricted access to Iraqi officials whom UN inspectors want to interview.


UNSCR 1137 - November 12, 1997

* Condemns the continued violations by Iraq" of previous UN resolutions, including its "implicit threat to the safety of" aircraft operated by UN inspectors and its tampering with UN inspector monitoring equipment.

* Reaffirms Iraq's responsibility to ensure the safety of UN inspectors.

* Iraq must cooperate fully with UN weapons inspectors and allow immediate, unconditional and unrestricted access.


UNSCR 1154 - March 2, 1998

* Iraq must cooperate fully with UN and IAEA weapons inspectors and allow immediate, unconditional and unrestricted access, and notes that any violation would have the "severest consequences for Iraq."


UNSCR 1194 - September 9, 1998

* Condemns the decision by Iraq of 5 August 1998 to suspend cooperation with" UN and IAEA inspectors, which constitutes "a totally unacceptable contravention" of its obligations under UNSCR 687, 707, 715, 1060, 1115, and 1154.

* Iraq must cooperate fully with UN and IAEA weapons inspectors, and allow immediate, unconditional and unrestricted access.


UNSCR 1205 - November 5, 1998

* "Condemns the decision by Iraq of 31 October 1998 to cease cooperation" with UN inspectors as "a flagrant violation" of UNSCR 687 and other resolutions.

* Iraq must provide "immediate, complete and unconditional cooperation" with UN and IAEA inspectors.


Additional UN Security Council Statements

In addition to the legally binding UNSCRs, the UN Security Council has also issued at least 30 statements from the President of the UN Security Council regarding Saddam Hussein's continued violations of UNSCRs. The list of statements includes:

UN Security Council Presidential Statement, June 28, 1991
UN Security Council Presidential Statement, February 5, 1992
UN Security Council Presidential Statement, February 19, 1992
UN Security Council Presidential Statement, February 28, 1992
UN Security Council Presidential Statement, March 6, 1992
UN Security Council Presidential Statement, March 11, 1992
UN Security Council Presidential Statement, March 12, 1992
UN Security Council Presidential Statement, April 10, 1992
UN Security Council Presidential Statement, June 17, 1992
UN Security Council Presidential Statement, July 6, 1992
UN Security Council Presidential Statement, September 2, 1992
UN Security Council Presidential Statement, November 23, 1992
UN Security Council Presidential Statement, November 24, 1992
UN Security Council Presidential Statement, January 8, 1993
UN Security Council Presidential Statement, January 11, 1993
UN Security Council Presidential Statement, June 18, 1993
UN Security Council Presidential Statement, June 28, 1993
UN Security Council Presidential Statement, November 23, 1993
UN Security Council Presidential Statement, October 8, 1994
UN Security Council Presidential Statement, March 19, 1996
UN Security Council Presidential Statement, June 14, 1996
UN Security Council Presidential Statement, August 23, 1996
UN Security Council Presidential Statement, December 30, 1996
UN Security Council Presidential Statement, June 13, 1997
UN Security Council Presidential Statement, October 29, 1997
UN Security Council Presidential Statement, November 13, 1997
UN Security Council Presidential Statement, December 3, 1997
UN Security Council Presidential Statement, December 22, 1997
UN Security Council Presidential Statement, January 14

2001-2009.state.gov...

Eventually, WMD was found hidden in Iraq.

a reply to: skyeagle409

You implied that dust samples from the "RJ Lee Group" depicted evidence of explosives when its results depicted on such thing, which is proven in its results chart.

This graphic is a simple visualisation regarding the classification/ identification of WTC-dust, no result-chart at all. So what? How does that piece refute their findings now, you know why the WTC-dust has a specific signature?

Care to elaborate on it's various funny colours?

a reply to: skyeagle409

Eventually, WMD was found hidden in Iraq.

Eventually? Some day the sun explodes in a supernova. Pics or it didn't happen.

a reply to: Informer1958

Just to let you know that you posted yet another bogus video. Fro an example, from time line 5:30 to 5:55, it speaks of the Windsor Buidling fire and claims that what was left standing was its steel frame, which wasn't true at all, the outer steel structure of the Windsor buildings collapsed while leaving its concrete structure standing.

Let's take a look at what you missed and what your video failed to mention for some reason or another.

The Windsor Building Fire

This fire is one of the fires Conspiracy theorist like to point to when talking about high raise office fires. This fire lasted 26 hours. But what they don't tell you is that the first collapse happened only 2 hours and 30 minutes after the fire began. But why didn't the building fall completely? It was on fire for 26 hours. The answer is very simple. The building were constructed very differently than the WTC. Reinforced concrete was used in the core and under the 17th floor.

Structural failure happened with the collapse of the steel perimeter columns which resulted with the floor slabs collapsing as the edge support was taken away. The massive concrete transfer slab at the 20th floor prevented further progressive failure.

www.debunking911.com...


Around midnight, on Saturday, February 12, 2005, a fire was detected on the 21st floor. The fire spread quickly throughout the entire building, leading to the collapse of the outermost, steel parts of the upper floors; firefighters needed almost 24 hours to extinguish it.

en.wikipedia.org...(Madrid)

What was left standing was the concrete structure of the Windsor building, which conspiracy theory websites tend to overlook.

a reply to: PublicOpinion

Notice that WMD was eventually found. In other words, WMD was found in Iraq during the second time around.

Check it out.

BOMBSHELL: New York Times Reports WMDs WERE Found in Iraq!

The New York Times shockingly admitted in an explosive front page report that thousands of WMDs were found in Iraq since the start of the war:

From 2004 to 2011, American and American-trained Iraqi troops repeatedly encountered, and on at least six occasions were wounded by, chemical weapons remaining from years earlier in Saddam Hussein’s rule.

In all, American troops secretly reported finding roughly 5,000 chemical warheads, shells or aviation bombs, according to interviews with dozens of participants, Iraqi and American officials, and heavily redacted intelligence documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act.

So, now it needs to be repeated millions of times: there WERE WMDs found in Iraq! But of course The Times couldn’t admit that their discovery vindicates President Bush.

www.thepoliticalinsider.com...

a reply to: Informer1958

Thanks for the vids, I thought Fallujah was already forgotten...
For your already bursting collection:

9/11 - Anatomy of a Great Deception - Complete Version



1,164,239 viewers

a reply to: skyeagle409

From 2004 to 2011, American and American-trained Iraqi troops repeatedly encountered, and on at least six occasions were wounded by, chemical weapons remaining from years earlier in Saddam Hussein’s rule.

That story was awesome as well. German supply, we Krauts actually sold that crap. Blaim Karl Kolb maybe?

Iraq’s biological warfare development pursued a similar course, but by the time Iraqis were testing biological warheads (containing anthrax and botulinum toxin) in Iraq’s deserts, the war had come to an end

en.wikipedia.org...


Fail-brigade anyone?

originally posted by: skyeagle409

Around midnight, on Saturday, February 12, 2005, a fire was detected on the 21st floor. The fire spread quickly throughout the entire building, leading to the collapse of the outermost, steel parts of the upper floors; firefighters needed almost 24 hours to extinguish it.

What was left standing was the concrete structure of the Windsor building, which conspiracy theory websites tend to overlook.

I notice there's no citation for this claim on Wikipedia. Actually, the claim was added much later than the original entry and, in fact, the word 'steel' was added even later.

All without any source.

Strange. Usually they don't edit wiki entries without SOME source.

The original entry(ies) can be viewed through the waybackmachine here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windsor_Tower

a reply to: skyeagle409

Just to let you know that you posted yet another bogus video.

Your "opinions" are not facts.

a reply to: PublicOpinion

I like the few words at the end of your video: "IGNORANCE is STRENGTH."

That explains why the Truth Movement has been discredited over the years, and as an example, let's not forget how Gordon Duff duped conspiracy theorist over the years and by his own admission as a disinformation source during the time conspiracy theorist were him as a reference source.

a reply to: Informer1958

All you have to do is to prove me wrong. Are you up to the challenge? You've already committed a few blunders today by posting bogus videos that were well-known as such.

a reply to: skyeagle409

I'm lost in translation, you are lost on irony iron.



Star for you!

a reply to: PublicOpinion

Apparently, conspiracy theorist were using Gordon Duff, Jeff Prager and "Veterans Today" in their arguments against me on what took down the WTC buildings. It was later determined that what they were feeding the Truth Movement was a hoax.

I tried to warn the CT folks but they failed to heed my warnings that what they were posting was a hoax. That, in regard to nukes at ground zero in New York City.

a reply to: skyeagle409

All you have to do is to prove me wrong. Are you up to the challenge? You've already committed a few blunders today by posting bogus videos that were well-known as such.

I already have, you lose again.

No the videos in question are not bogus.

Fact is you never watched any of them in your fast responds of making your phony claims to all my videos which are very long.

We all know the OS is one BIG FAT LIE.

Prove all these eyewitness are lairs, prove these video fake? No you cant.

a reply to: skyeagle409

Apparently, conspiracy theorist supporting the OS were using NIST, who made a whooping 3 million dollars to fool the public and they destroyed all their credibility in the process.

The fact is most OS supporters claims our government did no wrong on 911. Another fallacy.

OS supporters claim some office fires with jet fuel brought down two WTC steal framed building in one hour. Impossible.

a reply to: Informer1958

Have you seen this yet?...not sure if it has been posted yet


www.youtube.com...

a reply to: sueloujo

THIS WILL SHOCK YOU TO YOUR CORE: 9/11 From Cheney to Mossad



Yes, I did see this video before, it is very interesting. I believe it was brought to my attention about a month ago.

a reply to: skyeagle409

Care to substantiate your empty and shallow claims? Frankly, nobody on Ceres cares when you can't put up anything at all.

Calling my aunt my unkle doesn't... ah forget about it. As you constantly shift your goal-posts I will take your silence regarding all the other open points in our... ehm ... debate...(?) as a loud and unspoken YES!

Only 8% strongly agree that they have been told the full story of the 9/11 attacks.
Of those who expressed an opinion 37% agreed that rogue elements in the American intelligence services may have made a decision prior to 9/11 to allow a terrorist attack to take place.
...
Richard Clarke, Bush White House anti-terrorism Tsar, said recently that the 9/11 attacks could have been foiled but for an explicit agreement within the CIA to withhold vital information from him and the FBI. Clarke says he cannot explain this behaviour. At the time the CIA were prohibited by law from operating in the US.

www.reinvestigate911.org...

Uhm... that hurts, doesn't it? All this tendentious babbling to sway public opinion was for nothing?


Thanks for the fish and have a Brave New Week!