It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Did the whitehouse and others already know the scotus decisions beforehand?

page: 1
10
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 27 2015 @ 06:24 PM
link   
Ok i'd like to know how they had all these lights rigged up and ready to go once the SCOTUS on the ruling about gay marriage?

I mean it would take days to rig these lights at the heights of some of these shown in the photo I include, yet right after the announcement the lights shine in a multitude of places.

They must have already have known the outcome considering the cost, manpower, ect. It's not just the White House all rigged and lighted either! Why even do it and who paid for it?

Come on if this doesn't stink conspiracy what does?

What says you ATS? I think this stinks to high hell! I am OK with the ruling, but not ok with collusion, fraud, conspiracy, cost's and insider info which is apparent and to me appalling!


edit on 6/27/15 by proob4 because: (no reason given)




posted on Jun, 27 2015 @ 06:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: proob4
Ok i'd like to know how they had all these lights rigged up and ready to go once the SCOTUS on the ruling about gay marriage?

I mean it would take days to rig these lights at the heights of some of these shown in the photo I include, yet right after the announcement the lights shine in a multitude of places.


You must have missed how they were lit up all month....

www.loc.gov...

So no conspiracy at all!
edit on 27-6-2015 by hellobruce because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 27 2015 @ 06:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: hellobruce

originally posted by: proob4
Ok i'd like to know how they had all these lights rigged up and ready to go once the SCOTUS on the ruling about gay marriage?

I mean it would take days to rig these lights at the heights of some of these shown in the photo I include, yet right after the announcement the lights shine in a multitude of places.


You must have missed how they were lit up all month....

www.loc.gov...

So no conspiracy at all!
Ok so even though thats the case I still find it suspicious such a HUGE ruling like this just slipped on in during gay pride month?
edit on 6/27/15 by proob4 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 27 2015 @ 06:37 PM
link   
a reply to: proob4




Ok so even though thats the case I still find it ironic such a HUGE ruling like this just slipped on in?

What do you mean "slipped on in?"
This case has been of high interest since the court convened.



posted on Jun, 27 2015 @ 06:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: proob4




Ok so even though thats the case I still find it ironic such a HUGE ruling like this just slipped on in?

What do you mean "slipped on in?"
This case has been of high interest since the court convened.
Why not 2, 3, 5 years ago then? Why the lights now and the ruling now if there was not inside info?



posted on Jun, 27 2015 @ 06:40 PM
link   
a reply to: proob4
Because it is the first time the SCOTUS considered a same sex marriage case.



posted on Jun, 27 2015 @ 06:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: proob4




Ok so even though thats the case I still find it ironic such a HUGE ruling like this just slipped on in?

What do you mean "slipped on in?"
This case has been of high interest since the court convened.


nevermind

edit on 6/27/15 by proob4 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 27 2015 @ 06:41 PM
link   
a reply to: proob4

My post shows no edits.
Yours does.



posted on Jun, 27 2015 @ 06:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: proob4
Because it is the first time the SCOTUS considered a same sex marriage case.


But if they rigged these lights surely they knew the outcome?



posted on Jun, 27 2015 @ 06:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: proob4

My post shows no edits.
Yours does.
Sorry i made a mistake and thought you quoted from the OP. Just had my mind on something else for a brief time.



posted on Jun, 27 2015 @ 06:43 PM
link   
a reply to: proob4
Your calling me a liar causes me to bail on your idiotic thread.



edit on 6/27/2015 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 27 2015 @ 06:44 PM
link   
a reply to: proob4

The Supremes bent the rules with making the damned law not a tax when it definitely was/is a tax.
Did you think they would change their game plan when any other honest obstacles appeared in the way?

Frankly, I believe everybody knew how it would turn out which is why no big affair was made about the matter when it was coming up to be settled. Conservatives are not exactly displeased as they don't want to craft something of their own that is still going to drown the country. --"Let Obama have it," was probably a smart move on their part from start to finish. And they can start tinkering with the remedial work until 2016 telling us all along where the basic faults originated. In the end, the system will be propped up, the Dems will remain hurting and the GOP will look better than usual.



posted on Jun, 27 2015 @ 06:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: proob4
Your calling me a liar causes me to bail on your idiotic thread.


No I made a error, sorry i corrected the post. And please stop with the idiotic BS name calling already.
I made a mistake on what i read when and what i said when called you a liar. Sorry, Don't take it personal ok?
edit on 6/27/15 by proob4 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 27 2015 @ 07:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: proob4

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: proob4
Because it is the first time the SCOTUS considered a same sex marriage case.


But if they rigged these lights surely they knew the outcome?


Or they were showing support for it?

Why does it have to be they knew the outcome?



posted on Jun, 27 2015 @ 07:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sremmos80

originally posted by: proob4

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: proob4
Because it is the first time the SCOTUS considered a same sex marriage case.


But if they rigged these lights surely they knew the outcome?


Or they were showing support for it?

Why does it have to be they knew the outcome?
Ok who paid for it then and why?
edit on 6/27/15 by proob4 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 27 2015 @ 07:27 PM
link   
The lights are probably always there. If they're old, it's as simple as changing the gel, only takes a few minutes and a couple bucks really...if they're new....it's all changed by remote computer control, that only takes seconds, and costs nothing.
edit on 27-6-2015 by Wetpaint72 because: Spelling error

edit on 27-6-2015 by Wetpaint72 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 27 2015 @ 07:59 PM
link   
The POTUS ordered it just like any other dictator does.



posted on Jun, 27 2015 @ 08:09 PM
link   
a reply to: proob4

I am happy that gay LGBT people now have the same marriage rights as hetro's (welcome to the jungle y'all lol), but I did think the same thing you did OP about the light display at the White House - I didn't think conspiracy, but I did find the lights odd...my, my that sure was a quick response from the POTUS to the SCOTUS...hmmm!



posted on Jun, 27 2015 @ 08:42 PM
link   
The White House has their infiltrations in many places.




posted on Jun, 27 2015 @ 10:10 PM
link   
a reply to: proob4

Of course they knew, and they are flaunting it.

Some folks need to remember that pride preceded the biggest fall in history, that of Satan from Heaven.




top topics



 
10
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join