It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Sremmos80
Then boycott walmart, it was their decision to do both deny and make the other cake.
Me thinks when the guy ordered the cake he didn't tell them it was an ISIS flag and the person was ignorant to what that was.
That flag is also in the same situation as the confederate flag.
The message of that flag, as in what it says, is used by plenty that don't have anything to do with ISIS.
But has been hijacked by people that want to distort it.
Just like how the white supremacist of our nation cling to that confederate flag.
But I would agree it has no business in our stores or on a cake because of what it currently stands for.
Just recently. a walmart worker refused to make a gay marriage cake. They were scolded and walmart stated they had no such policy. So, I am imagining that walmart bakers were looking for 'policy'. The policy stated 'no confederate flag cake' or certain colors. A picture comes in to put an ISIS flag on a cake and either the worker was worried about being scolded and looking for policy' that he/she could not find or had absolutely no idea of what the picture was. I do not believe this is a conspiracy to accept ISIS flags over the Confederate flag.
originally posted by: theabsolutetruth
Somehow I am not surprised. Apply walmart 'logic' to 'life' and you will get a jist of UK politics. ''careful not to stir the 'multicultural' pot'' mentality from officials.
originally posted by: AVoiceOfReason
Ok so this guy probably went to Walmart with a picture of the Isis flag and said I want this on a cake. Come on folks, most people don't give a damn about the middle east or anything happening there I guarantee you I could go to Walmart and ask everyone in the store if they are familiar with that flag and most of them will not be.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: buster2010
So, you would rather them not lose their job because they don't produce more than $15/hour even though their employer pays them that. I didn't think so.
Not that it has anything to do with the thread.