It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Seede
You see, you are right back to square one because you will not open your mind and learn. Look at your last post. You can not get it through your head that Jesus did not preserve civil or dietary law. Jesus obeyed the dietary and civil laws of His day but His new covenant given to all people, by His death, does not include the old laws of diet and civil practice in His day.
This is incorrect and the height of ignorance.The SCOTUS do not make "laws" to be followed and saying that "Blacks and Hispanics are more apt to vote" on these premises(eating lobster) is the worse type of racism.
Congress and the President of the U. S., George Bush, indicated in Public Law 102-14, 102nd Congress, that the United States of America was founded upon the Seven Universal Laws of Noah, and that these Laws have been the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization.
originally posted by: arpgme
a reply to: Seede
you have been ordered to accept homosexuality and Lesbianism by the SCOTUS
This is not correct.Yahoshua did not "follow" the dietary laws of his day.There is nothing in the scripture that ever said he did.He clearly stated: And Yahoshua called to all the crowds, and he said to them, "Hear me all of you and understand." "There is nothing outside of a man that enters into him that can defile him; but the thing that proceeds from him, that is what defiles the man." "Whoever has an ear to hear, let him hear." The fact is it was written that he broke many of the customs and laws of the Jews because he was not a "practicing Jew"(or any religion especially Christianity) as you and your "church" believe.
No. You are still free to condemn homosexuality. You have been ordered to stop trying to stop gay marriage which is forcing your religious views on others and violating their Freedom of Religion. That is all.
Tell that to the couple that just got fined.
"Freedom of religion means freedom to hold an opinion or belief, but not to take action in violation of social duties or subversive to good order,"
In Reynolds v. United States (1878), the Supreme Court found that while laws cannot interfere with religious belief and opinions, laws can be made to regulate some religious practices (e.g., human sacrifices, and the Hindu practice of suttee). The Court stated that to rule otherwise, "would be to make the professed doctrines of religious belief superior to the law of the land, and in effect permit every citizen to become a law unto himself. Government would exist only in name under such circumstances."
"Laws are made for the government of actions, and while they cannot interfere with mere religious beliefs and opinions, they may with practices."
And here we thought the U.S. was founded on the top Ten. Oops, guess we were wrong, huh? Sadly, this is not just for the state of Yisra’el (Israel) or even the U. S., but for the whole world:
originally posted by: buster2010
There many quotes by the founders themselves that says America was founded in no way on Christianity or any other religion. Also if you pay attention to Israel they aren't following the laws of their faith either.
Though they were divided religiously, they all seem to agree that biblical morality takes precedence over governmental institution.
As for taking precedence, I refer to the basic sense of morality they sought to promote in the people at the time.
Whether that morality took place in the form of an organized religious establishment, or theism in general, the government has no place in detracting from it so long as it does NOT violate such base principles.
originally posted by: windword
The later six commandments represent biblical morality? What happened to the first 4? Are you saying then, that this supposed morality, that our government is based on, has nothing to do with the worship and fear of a god, but is based on just following random orders, blindly?
That sounds like our government!
originally posted by: windword
The founding fathers had no desire to promote a "basic sense of morality", they were trying to form a moral government for a moral people..
originally posted by: windword
In other words, "Separation of Church and State" and "Congress shall make no laws that respect religion".