It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
After calling the last day "some of the darkest 24 hours in our nation's history," Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) is now calling for Supreme Court justices to face elections.
In a National Review op-ed published Friday, Cruz chastised the high court for its decisions to reject a major challenge to Obamacare and to legalize same-sex marriage nationwide.
"Both decisions were judicial activism, plain and simple," Cruz writes. "Both were lawless."
To challenge that "judicial activism," Cruz said he is proposing a constitutional amendment to require Supreme Court justices to face retention elections every eight years
"The decisions that have deformed our constitutional order and have debased our culture are but symptoms of the disease of liberal judicial activism that has infected our judiciary," Cruz writes. "A remedy is needed that will restore health to the sick man in our constitutional system. Rendering the justices directly accountable to the people would provide such a remedy."
Under Cruz's proposed amendment, justices would have to be approved by a majority of American voters as well as by the majority of voters in least half of the states. If they failed to reach the required approval rating, they would be removed from office and barred from serving on the Supreme Court in the future.
Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (R), who is expected to jump in the presidential race soon, also offered up a proposed constitutional fix to combat the Supreme Court's marriage equality decision. In a statement, Walker argued for an amendment to define marriage as between one man and one woman -- a proposal Cruz has also floated.
originally posted by: Gothmog
I agree. But to hold open elections , or something close , would be best.
1st - The only branch to where members are appointed for life.
2nd - The only branch where they are appointed and not elected.(i.e. the people have no say so at all)
They are not Chief of Staff , Attorney General , etc. , they are the Judicial Branch of the US Federal Government and equivalent to Congressional members or the President. SO , why not ?
Ted Cruz Wants to be able to Vote Out Supreme Court Justices
How many more times can one challenge and attempt to repeal "Obamacare"? How much money has already been spent beating that dead equine?
being able to vote cheapens Justice; makes it something that can be bought and sold.