It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Who is Really Behind Dylann Roof’s “Racist Manifesto” Website?

page: 6
21
<< 3  4  5   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 29 2015 @ 09:22 AM
link   
Oops
edit on 29-6-2015 by violet because: (no reason given)




posted on Jun, 29 2015 @ 10:26 AM
link   

originally posted by: JeanPaul

originally posted by: diggindirt
a reply to: Subaeruginosa
You were the one throwing out accusations against members here for expressing "exact same opinions" as this manifesto.
I take it from your response that you actually do not have quotes to offer up in support of your nasty statement about members here.
You made a claim that you can't back up so you need to apologize for painting the entire site as "extremist" if you can't back up your "opinion" with actual quotes that you assert reflect the same ideology as the writer of the manifesto.
You can hold any opinion you wish and you can have whatever "feelings" make you feel good about yourself but you can't throw out accusations like that without backing up your accusations with actual evidence. That's what rational, critical thinking adults do.


I'll jump in here and say, just the other day, someone on this site used the same "different breeds" argument against black people.

They said Iraqi's needed a dictator to keep them in line. Then went on about black people in America being much the same.

He/she was being rather cryptic but I squeezed the juice out of her/his posts.

I haven't posted here long but have encountered the stereotypical right wingers. Nothing wrong with this forum...they're everywhere.

On a different note the person who found his manifesto is a "tankie" and a radical feminist. Those sorts are the worst "socialism" has to offer. Marxist-Leninists, in her case Maoist. I don't think these sorts of people are interested in Saul Alinsky. They're troglodytes to the tenth power with fantasies of storming the winter palace in Russia. Or reliving those conditions. The RadFem views are also grossly outdated. As if it's 1935. Heck, they were outdated when they came out in the 1970's.

Anyway, why is it hard to believe a racist would go and kill people of color? The whole WPWW "movement" is fixated on starting some sort of "race war". The guy was a white nationalist. It's a violent ideology. Much more extreme than the average "conservative" mindset no doubt. I wouldn't compare the average conservative to this guy.


You have done nothing but insinuate that the average conservative is a racist who would murder minorities at the drop of a hat. That has been your only purpose here.

Nice try at walking it back though.



posted on Jun, 29 2015 @ 11:36 AM
link   
It is obvious to me that the shooting event is something other than the media portrays. In reality it is the assassination of a SENATOR PREACHER. The timing of the event is the key. Another key is the usual media circus response with in depth knowledge flashed on the television so quickly. Sketchy website, yes. Picture set ups, yes. Who took the photos? Which agent is a look alike for the young man? Who led him into the storyline? All the usual targets are present. Guns, white kids, mental health questions, etc. Got to get everybody into a doctor's office. All persons must report for a check up.



posted on Jun, 29 2015 @ 12:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: ISawItFirst

originally posted by: JeanPaul

originally posted by: diggindirt
a reply to: Subaeruginosa
You were the one throwing out accusations against members here for expressing "exact same opinions" as this manifesto.
I take it from your response that you actually do not have quotes to offer up in support of your nasty statement about members here.
You made a claim that you can't back up so you need to apologize for painting the entire site as "extremist" if you can't back up your "opinion" with actual quotes that you assert reflect the same ideology as the writer of the manifesto.
You can hold any opinion you wish and you can have whatever "feelings" make you feel good about yourself but you can't throw out accusations like that without backing up your accusations with actual evidence. That's what rational, critical thinking adults do.


I'll jump in here and say, just the other day, someone on this site used the same "different breeds" argument against black people.

They said Iraqi's needed a dictator to keep them in line. Then went on about black people in America being much the same.

He/she was being rather cryptic but I squeezed the juice out of her/his posts.

I haven't posted here long but have encountered the stereotypical right wingers. Nothing wrong with this forum...they're everywhere.

On a different note the person who found his manifesto is a "tankie" and a radical feminist. Those sorts are the worst "socialism" has to offer. Marxist-Leninists, in her case Maoist. I don't think these sorts of people are interested in Saul Alinsky. They're troglodytes to the tenth power with fantasies of storming the winter palace in Russia. Or reliving those conditions. The RadFem views are also grossly outdated. As if it's 1935. Heck, they were outdated when they came out in the 1970's.

Anyway, why is it hard to believe a racist would go and kill people of color? The whole WPWW "movement" is fixated on starting some sort of "race war". The guy was a white nationalist. It's a violent ideology. Much more extreme than the average "conservative" mindset no doubt. I wouldn't compare the average conservative to this guy.


You have done nothing but insinuate that the average conservative is a racist who would murder minorities at the drop of a hat. That has been your only purpose here.

Nice try at walking it back though.


Ya sure.



new topics

top topics
 
21
<< 3  4  5   >>

log in

join