It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: boymonkey74
a reply to: chr0naut
I wish you would research a bit before posting.
RE is part of the national curriculum so your post is mute.
www.gov.uk...
originally posted by: grainofsand
originally posted by: NavyDoc
considering the topic of discussion--the failings of the UK education system.
No, the topic is about the UK preventing publicly funded schools from teaching creationism as a scientific theory, not 'the failings of the UK education system'.
I think you may be confused?
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: grainofsand
originally posted by: NavyDoc
considering the topic of discussion--the failings of the UK education system.
No, the topic is about the UK preventing publicly funded schools from teaching creationism as a scientific theory, not 'the failings of the UK education system'.
I think you may be confused?
Considering the poster argues that people will not get a good education if creationism is taught in a minority of schools but then goes on to confuse "mute" with "moot," I think it was apt to point out the irony.
Well certainly regarding kids at the religious schools which were caught teaching creationism in science classes, they will have a better chance at gaining critical thinking skills now they cannot be subjected to fairy tales as fact.
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: grainofsand
originally posted by: NavyDoc
considering the topic of discussion--the failings of the UK education system.
No, the topic is about the UK preventing publicly funded schools from teaching creationism as a scientific theory, not 'the failings of the UK education system'.
I think you may be confused?
Considering the poster argues that people will not get a good education if creationism is taught in a minority of schools but then goes on to confuse "mute" with "moot," I think it was apt to point out the irony.
originally posted by: GetHyped
a reply to: chr0naut
Yeah, let's just stick to the science. Please provide the scientific evidence for creationism, not your stoner philosophy.
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: GetHyped
a reply to: chr0naut
Yeah, let's just stick to the science. Please provide the scientific evidence for creationism, not your stoner philosophy.
I'm over 50 and did a degree in Astrophysics years ago and I still maintain an interest.
I don't like Marijuana, as I found it highly irritant and it made me feel nauseous and disoriented rather than high.
I don't think that qualifies anything I said as "stoner philosophy".
Please provide scientific evidence for abiogenesis, or for how supersymmetry was broken, for how singularities do not have a firewall at the schwarzschild radius or for a mechanism that explains inflation ... and not just another theory or concept, I want real measurable scientific evidence.
Just provide some scientific evidence.
Please provide scientific evidence for abiogenesis
originally posted by: boymonkey74
a reply to: NavyDoc
Also it is not hard to understand if science is taught in a science class and no myths more science can be taught.
Stop being a nob eh?.
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
a reply to: NavyDoc
I wasn't gonna say it, but yeah. If you're going to argue for education, at least make sure you don't confuse your words. Not to say I agree with your other point, I think religion has no place in public schools beyond history courses. However, you make a keen observation here.
ETA: Ah, Dyslexia could go to explain that, but that's more misplacing letters within a word, not confusing one word for another. I think it was more a harmless typo.
originally posted by: nonspecific
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: GetHyped
a reply to: chr0naut
Yeah, let's just stick to the science. Please provide the scientific evidence for creationism, not your stoner philosophy.
I'm over 50 and did a degree in Astrophysics years ago and I still maintain an interest.
I don't like Marijuana, as I found it highly irritant and it made me feel nauseous and disoriented rather than high.
I don't think that qualifies anything I said as "stoner philosophy".
Please provide scientific evidence for abiogenesis, or for how supersymmetry was broken, for how singularities do not have a firewall at the schwarzschild radius or for a mechanism that explains inflation ... and not just another theory or concept, I want real measurable scientific evidence.
Just provide some scientific evidence.
I believe he asked first, politness would suggest you should reply to his question before asking your own.
If you have a degree in Astrophysics you have probably heard of the "God of the Gaps".
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: GetHyped
a reply to: chr0naut
Yeah, let's just stick to the science. Please provide the scientific evidence for creationism, not your stoner philosophy.
I'm over 50 and did a degree in Astrophysics years ago and I still maintain an interest.
I don't like Marijuana, as I found it highly irritant and it made me feel nauseous and disoriented rather than high.
I don't think that qualifies anything I said as "stoner philosophy".
Please provide scientific evidence for abiogenesis, or for how supersymmetry was broken, for how singularities do not have a firewall at the schwarzschild radius or for a mechanism that explains inflation ... and not just another theory or concept, I want real measurable scientific evidence.
Just provide some scientific evidence.
originally posted by: chr0naut
You may have missed it but I did reply to GetHyped that there was no particular evidence for either Creationism or the 'scientific' theories, apart from the existence of everything.
He wrote my reply off, I believe, as "stoner philosophy".
Since I have answered him, perhaps politeness would now dictate an answer, in turn, to my request.
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: nonspecific
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: GetHyped
a reply to: chr0naut
Yeah, let's just stick to the science. Please provide the scientific evidence for creationism, not your stoner philosophy.
I'm over 50 and did a degree in Astrophysics years ago and I still maintain an interest.
I don't like Marijuana, as I found it highly irritant and it made me feel nauseous and disoriented rather than high.
I don't think that qualifies anything I said as "stoner philosophy".
Please provide scientific evidence for abiogenesis, or for how supersymmetry was broken, for how singularities do not have a firewall at the schwarzschild radius or for a mechanism that explains inflation ... and not just another theory or concept, I want real measurable scientific evidence.
Just provide some scientific evidence.
I believe he asked first, politness would suggest you should reply to his question before asking your own.
You may have missed it but I did reply to GetHyped that there was no particular evidence for either Creationism or the 'scientific' theories, apart from the existence of everything.
He wrote my reply off, I believe, as "stoner philosophy".
Since I have answered him, perhaps politeness would now dictate an answer, in turn, to my request.