It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Planet X just revealed by Google Sky? Black swath gone, ‘winged disk’ visible

page: 7
47
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 25 2015 @ 02:20 PM
link   
a reply to: Xcalibur254




A large mass body could not periodically enter the inner solar system without throwing the orbits of the planets into chaos. Planet X/Nibiru/Nemesis/etc does not exist.


Who says the planets are not thrown into chaos at points in time we do have some rubble out there the planets have some oddities that could be explained this way. A second sun need not come "into" our system a system of planets around it and moons may bring them close, what effects this would cause and how soon in their orbit would all depend on the details.

This moon may have belonged to the other suns system

It is the only large moon in the Solar System with a retrograde orbit, which is an orbit in the opposite direction to its planet's rotation.[2][11] At 2,700 kilometres (1,700 mi) in diameter, it is the seventh-largest moon in the Solar System. Because of its retrograde orbit and composition similar to Pluto's, Triton is thought to have been captured from the Kuiper belt.




posted on Jun, 25 2015 @ 02:22 PM
link   
a reply to: Char-Lee

The prevailing theory on our moon is that it was formed after a collision with early earth by a roughly mars-sized object.



posted on Jun, 25 2015 @ 02:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
a reply to: Char-Lee

The prevailing theory on our moon is that it was formed after a collision with early earth by a roughly mars-sized object.


I didn't mention our moon, but yes that is the "prevailing theory".



posted on Jun, 25 2015 @ 02:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: wildespace
Google Sky is a lousy "toy" for the general public and has defects like missing images (hence the black rectangle, which they apparently finally managed to fix). Nobody with a serious interest in astronomy and space should be using it. There's a much more superior site - Sky-Map.org - which doesn't have any missing images, and provides a plethora of information to boot. And of course any serious astronomer will take a look at the original images used by such websites from the actual source, like the DSS archive.

The "winged planet" is a well-known T Tauri-type star: simbad.u-strasbg.fr...

~~~

Let's have a little astronomy lesson, shall we?

1) Planets orbiting a star don't stick around in the same location in the sky. Any planet supposedly "hidden" behind that black rectangle would have moved out of it a long time ago.

2) You can't hide a patch of sky from people with telescopes.

3) People propagating the Nibiru/Planet X myth have no idea how astronomy or the celestial mechanics work. Tens of thousands of independant amateur astronomers around the world actually do. With the amateurs regularly discovering new comets and asteroids (some of which are fainter than Pluto), you'd think they wouldn't miss a whole new planet in our own Solar System.


While doing research I missed your post and al of page 5...

Is this not talking about the larger sun in the picture and NOT the winged object?
Can you explain the appearance of the object for us? What causes the picture to show wings if this is a star?
edit on 25-6-2015 by Char-Lee because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 25 2015 @ 02:32 PM
link   

originally posted by: Char-Lee

originally posted by: ngchunter

originally posted by: Char-Lee

originally posted by: 3danimator2014

originally posted by: Ultralight
a reply to: 3danimator2014

I will spend my FREE time where I choose, thank you. You know nothing about my educational background and, I feel, are intentionally condescending.
Either that or I haven't had enough hot chi tea this morning and my cranky factor is set on stun.

Im not commenting about you. Im commenting about your lack of scientific knowledge on the subject of this thread. That you think that astronomers can track inbound small lumps of rock is astounding enough. But that you (and others) dont seem to fathom the effect that Planet X would have on EVERY SINGLE planet in the solar system is just mind boggling. Its been explained, over and over and over again.

The science is simple enough for schoolkids to get, but you ( meaning also all you planetx believers) feel the need to ignore such mundane facts such as gravity in order to play make believe.

I dont get it. The universe is exciting enough...you dont need to make up stuff.


I am sorry but it is not a simple thing and if you think so you are the one who needs to do some more studying.
First off gravity is not a simple thing it is not even know what it is. There is so much to learn and at every turn we read, "scientists find impossible" the impossible being weighed against their former belief.

There are changes happening to the earth, sun and all of the planets at this time, unpredicted and not understood changes, since you have a love of science you will know this.

Here are the limits of the mass/distance function of any putative planet X. Please tell me how this fits in with your claims that it's causing "earth changes?"
arxiv.org...


First off this article is old there is a lot of new information and new science since then.

It's not that old and unless you can prove it wrong, it stands.



posted on Jun, 25 2015 @ 02:33 PM
link   
a reply to: Char-Lee

Again, and for the last time, the image IS NOT FROM 2007, THE IMAGES WERE STITCHED BY GOOGLE IN 2007, THE IMAGE IS FROM THE 90'S AND THE OBJECT HASN'T BEEN MOVING, I CAN SHOW YOU IMAGES OF IT FROM 60 YEARS AGO!



posted on Jun, 25 2015 @ 02:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: Char-Lee
Is this not talking about the largs sun in the picture and NOT the winged object?
Can you explain the appearance of the object for us? What causes the picture to show wings if this is a star?

NO IT IS NOT TALKING ABOUT THE "LARGER SUN." It is talking about the "winged object," the wings of which are simply a reflection nebula associated with the T Tauri system! THIS IS NOT UNCOMMON FOR T TAURI STARS!
archive.stsci.edu...
Oh look, there's ANOTHER ONE!



posted on Jun, 25 2015 @ 02:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: ngchunter
a reply to: Char-Lee

Again, and for the last time, the image IS NOT FROM 2007, THE IMAGES WERE STITCHED BY GOOGLE IN 2007, THE IMAGE IS FROM THE 90'S AND THE OBJECT HASN'T BEEN MOVING, I CAN SHOW YOU IMAGES OF IT FROM 60 YEARS AGO!


Why are you shouting?

I didn't say it was 2007 I said the article I supplied did.

Did I say the object moved?




posted on Jun, 25 2015 @ 02:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: ngchunter

originally posted by: Char-Lee
Is this not talking about the largs sun in the picture and NOT the winged object?
Can you explain the appearance of the object for us? What causes the picture to show wings if this is a star?

NO IT IS NOT TALKING ABOUT THE "LARGER SUN." It is talking about the "winged object," the wings of which are simply a reflection nebula associated with the T Tauri system! THIS IS NOT UNCOMMON FOR T TAURI STARS!
archive.stsci.edu...
Oh look, there's ANOTHER ONE!


Dang you like hearing yourself YELL!

Since you are answering for the person I asked...the article he linked said "stars" it did not show the individual star with a "winged" look.
The view on Sky Map does not name the "star" when we learn something and want to share normally we supply all of the information and show where to find it. For all of us who know anything about the subject or not!
The coordinates do not show the one object but an area.
edit on 25-6-2015 by Char-Lee because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 25 2015 @ 02:40 PM
link   
haha...the really bright star thingy in the upper right corner kinda looks like the painting of Jesus in a UFO



posted on Jun, 25 2015 @ 02:49 PM
link   
a reply to: BELIEVERpriest




If planet x was coming, I doubt they would tell us directly, but we know that TPTB like to drop all sorts of confusing hints


You would know, so trying to hide it from you won't matter.



posted on Jun, 25 2015 @ 02:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: blacktie
google has been extremely busy providing this information to us today
at least we saw the screen pic before it was blacked out



Which picture is that? the 'winged disc' hasn't been blacked out circa 2007 to date. The blacked out area given is in a different place, has been blank for years, circa 2007 to date.



posted on Jun, 25 2015 @ 03:02 PM
link   
I love this stuff...
Gonna get out my sons old $50.00 scope and see if I can find me some kewl doom porn.

I was Soooo waiting on the Death Star to show up and now.........



posted on Jun, 25 2015 @ 03:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: DogMeat
I love this stuff...
Gonna get out my sons old $50.00 scope and see if I can find me some kewl doom porn.

I was Soooo waiting on the Death Star to show up and now.........
Wouldn't that be some S#it?

"Hey son let's go stargazing! ....That's no moon."



posted on Jun, 25 2015 @ 03:07 PM
link   
a reply to: TheBlackDog



here you go

And I did make a mistake in saying it was 10 times the distance, its 11 times larger than Jupiter, I misremembered the article.
edit on 25-6-2015 by AVoiceOfReason because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 25 2015 @ 03:15 PM
link   
a reply to: Char-Lee

I already provided all information about this object and you can check my sources. You're repeating nonsense.



posted on Jun, 25 2015 @ 03:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: DogMeat
I love this stuff...
Gonna get out my sons old $50.00 scope and see if I can find me some kewl doom porn.

I was Soooo waiting on the Death Star to show up and now.........

Yeah, good luck with that. I'll be very impressed if you manage to see this dim reflection nebula with a $50 dollar telescope, particularly while it's right next to the sun. They're quite dim, even to my $3,000 telescope and $3,000 astronomical CCD.
h.dropcanvas.com...

edit on 25-6-2015 by ngchunter because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 25 2015 @ 03:32 PM
link   
a reply to: Ultralight

Can you explain this harvest in more details? I would like to see if it matches up what I think it is.



posted on Jun, 25 2015 @ 03:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: Char-Lee
a reply to: Xcalibur254


A large mass body could not periodically enter the inner solar system without throwing the orbits of the planets into chaos. Planet X/Nibiru/Nemesis/etc does not exist.



Who says the planets are not thrown into chaos at points in time we do have some rubble out there the planets have some oddities that could be explained this way. A second sun need not come "into" our system a system of planets around it and moons may bring them close, what effects this would cause and how soon in their orbit would all depend on the details.

I have some sympathy with that, a kind of X/chaos-factor, but I posted yesterday the WISE findings,

The WISE telescope has ruled out the possibility of a Saturn-sized object out to 10,000 AU, and a Jupiter-sized or larger object out to 26,000 AU, so they are saying. They must then be looking not just for perturbations in the local planets at home but also for the known objects behaviour as far out as the Jupiter size limit, as well as any effect the known objects would have on a planet X...I suppose you could rattle on for ever about that, but any planet X...IMHO would need to be very, very big to have a free lunch at the inner solar system, or even near it.

Anyway for a laugh, do you know what this bad boy is, saw it just today on Google sky. it seems so out of place, so is it a glitch, an asteroid, a weirdy spacecraft or an equally weirdy snotball?



Close-up,

files.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Jun, 25 2015 @ 03:45 PM
link   
Niburu/Google Sky threads are great for seeing just how many people actually can't bother to do even the most basic research before they buy into some crackpot theory. Wow. Just. . . wow. Seriously, the grasp as to what gravity is and how it works and how its effects linger upon a system is fairly weak 'round these parts.



new topics

top topics



 
47
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join