posted on Jun, 26 2015 @ 08:58 PM
Ok lets think about this:
clearly this whole thing is fake, but just for the sake of arguments lets pretend its true (or at least being played of as true)
1 Why the need for the respirators?
2 Doesn't the "control" unit look like an arcade game from the 80's?
3 Is the time machine the travel trailer, or the arcade game?
4 If she has another person with her, where is "that" person in the video?
5 Even more important "who" is that person?
6 Why use the machine without getting the event documented?
1 the use of respirators over a dedicated air system seem foolish, but even still what were they filtering out of the air? If her barn is that dusty
that you need a respirator, then if this was a real device the control isn't reliable due to possible contamination from dirt.
2 Maybe it's just me, but why? At least put the device in a more durable cabinet then one made of plywood. Modifying a steel storage cabinet doesn't
take much time and those cabinets aren't very pricey either.
3 This one is confusing since we really don't know what's going on in the video. If the device is the trailer, then shouldn't the control device be
inside of it? On the other hand if the arcade unit is the device, then what's the purpose of the trailer?
4 I only see her and the camera people running around. Did she put the person through time already when the video was shot? If that's the case she
might have well as murdered the person since it's doubtful that the person will be able to get back on their own.
5 Who is this person that she picked to go through time with? What was the criteria this person had that made them a candidate for this test? HOAX or
not if this person never shows up again, then a mystery has begun.
6 This also confuses me. If the film crew is there at the site of the activation, then why not have them film the whole thing? It wouldn't matter if
she decided to travel now, then, or when the fact is she had the film crew there to film it.
Now I will clarify this again, this whole event is in my opinion a HOAX/Fake, but for the points of debunking I'm asking questions that should be
addressed. You know to rule out the plausible fact that this "could" be true.