It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
“Jefferson owned slaves….and there’s a monument to him in the capital of the United States, no one ever asks for that to come down – is it equal?”
originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: introvert
Heaven forbid that you would actually acknowledge the anchor's statement and question in her own words:
(from the OP source)
“Jefferson owned slaves….and there’s a monument to him in the capital of the United States, no one ever asks for that to come down – is it equal?”
How is that not initiating a serious discussion on the comparison by the anchor?
And the man being asked answered it under 30 seconds, and the discussion moved on.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: introvert
Heaven forbid that you would actually acknowledge the anchor's statement and question in her own words:
(from the OP source)
“Jefferson owned slaves….and there’s a monument to him in the capital of the United States, no one ever asks for that to come down – is it equal?”
How is that not initiating a serious discussion on the comparison by the anchor?
Or do you insist on continuing this "THIS IS SERIOUS BUSINESS GUYS" narrative because it supports your anti-liberal agenda?
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
And the man being asked answered it under 30 seconds, and the discussion moved on.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: introvert
Heaven forbid that you would actually acknowledge the anchor's statement and question in her own words:
(from the OP source)
“Jefferson owned slaves….and there’s a monument to him in the capital of the United States, no one ever asks for that to come down – is it equal?”
How is that not initiating a serious discussion on the comparison by the anchor?
Let me see if I can make you understand this. "It. Was. A. Blurb."
A harmless soundbite with a harmless HYPOTHETICAL question.
What part of hypothetical do you not understand? Or do you insist on continuing this "THIS IS SERIOUS BUSINESS GUYS" narrative because it supports your anti-liberal agenda?
Okay, let's pull your thread and see where it takes us. Lets use your thought process and apply it to the OTHER side.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
And the man being asked answered it under 30 seconds, and the discussion moved on.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: introvert
Heaven forbid that you would actually acknowledge the anchor's statement and question in her own words:
(from the OP source)
“Jefferson owned slaves….and there’s a monument to him in the capital of the United States, no one ever asks for that to come down – is it equal?”
How is that not initiating a serious discussion on the comparison by the anchor?
Let me see if I can make you understand this. "It. Was. A. Blurb."
A harmless soundbite with a harmless HYPOTHETICAL question.
What part of hypothetical do you not understand? Or do you insist on continuing this "THIS IS SERIOUS BUSINESS GUYS" narrative because it supports your anti-liberal agenda?
Got it. Within the confines of primetime network newscasts, anchor's Blurbs and sound bites are "harmless".
Texas Liberals Sign Petition to Remove ‘Racist’ George Washington Statue
Liberals at the University of Texas signed a petition to remove a statue of George Washington and memorials to other founding fathers in another illustration of the politically correct insanity that has emerged in the wake of the Charleston massacre.
Students at the University have started an actual petition to remove statues of Robert E. Lee, the commander of the Confederate army, and Albert Sidney Johnston, a Confederate general who died during the Civil War, remarking, “It is impossible to reach the full potential of an inclusive and progressive learning institution while putting an idol of our darkest days on a pedestal.”
Black Lives Matter protesters also vandalized the statues earlier this week.
Given the fact that America’s Commander-in-Chief during the revolutionary war against the British and first President George Washington owned slaves his entire life and only emancipated them after his death, would UT students also support a move to wipe Washington from the pages of history?
The answer is yes, many of them would.
Several also agreed that demolishing the statues would be a fantastic way of controlling the future by re-writing history, a line lifted straight out of George Orwell’s 1984.
“It’s so bad it’s like as if you’re having a statue of maybe Hitler or someone like that,” said one trendy as he signed the petition.
Others were convinced to sign after being told that eradicating the statues was part of shifting the country towards socialism.
Another student agreed to sign the petition immediately after hearing the words “racist statues,” while another man said the statues represented “treason”.