It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Aloysius the Gaul
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: Aloysius the Gaul
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
[/post]
The people that worked with him still have his research. His family and other researchers carried on his institute in Maine. His granddaughter also has a lot of his work. While they burned what they could, he his a lot and moved a lot to universities for safe keeping. Check out the link below and you can find out how they carried on a lot of his research.
so what you are saying is that his research was NOT destroyed.......glad you cleared that up.
No...a lot of it was. A lot of his notes and writings were burned with his books and equipment.
So now it is "a lot of it was" (destroyed).....which is clearly not "all of it" - fair enough.......let's be clear.
originally posted by: Aloysius the Gaul
originally posted by: Bilk22
I thought weather modification was all hooey? You know how HAARP really couldn't do anything? The Saudis spent $11million and they get rain? Ah it's all hooey! LOL
nope - weather modification is very real.....whether it works or not is open to some debate on eth evidence, but people do pay money for it.
And it has nothing to do with HAARP.
The "ionization" rain makers have nothing to do with William Reich and their effectiveness is apparently debated even more than "traditional" cloud seeding.
Actually ionization does have to to with his devices
en.wikipedia.org...
A cloudbuster consists of an array of parallel hollow metal tubes which are connected at the rear to a series of flexible metal hoses which are equal or slightly smaller in diameter to the parallel tubes. Alternatively, the rear of the tubes are joined together to a single large diameter pipe and flexible metal hose. The open end of these hoses are placed in water, which Reich believed to be a natural orgone absorber. The pipes can be aimed into areas of the sky to draw energy to the ground like a lightning rod.
originally posted by: Asktheanimals
The US military has it's own weather warfare section.
Pretty odd to have something like that for technology that doesn't exist.
Disclaimer
2025 is a study designed to comply with a directive from the chief of staff of the Air Force to examine the
concepts, capabilities, and technologies the United States will require to remain the dominant air and space
force in the future. Presented on 17 June 1996, this report was produced in the Department of Defense school
environment of academic freedom and in the interest of advancing concepts related to national defense. The
views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the
United States Air Force, Department of Defense, or the United States government.
This report contains fictional representations of future situations/scenarios. Any similarities to real people or
events, other than those specifically cited, are unintentional and are for purposes of illustration only.
This publication has been reviewed by security and policy review authorities, is unclassified, and is cleared
for public release.
Researchers analyzed the successes and failures of dowsers in attempting to locate water at more than 2000 sites in arid regions of Sri Lanka, Zaire, Kenya, Namibia and Yemen over a 10-year period.
In Sri Lanka, for example, they drilled 691 holes and had an overall success rate of 96 percent.
"In hundreds of cases the dowsers were able to predict the depth of the water source and the yield of the well to within 10 percent or 20 percent,"
"We carefully considered the statistics of these correlations, and they far exceeded lucky guesses," he says. What's more, virtually all of the sites in Sri Lanka were in regions where the odds of finding water by random drilling were extremely low.
As for a USGS notion that dowsers get subtle clues from the landscape and geology, Betz points out that the underground sources were often more than 100 ft. deep and so narrow that misplacing the drill only a few feet would mean digging a dry hole.
originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: Vasa Croe
I look forward to your thread. I still would love to see this technology in action. For so many people to vehemently believe in it, there must be something to it. But unfortunately, this will probably go down the same way Billy Meyer's water car did.
Lots of anecdotal evidence, but nothing you can verify.
originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: Vasa Croe
I think it was very much on topic. Perhaps more so than the OP.
I was mocking the article and I have laughed at this "technology" before since it's not proven and sounds a bit "out there".
But I would be pleasantly surprised to see that I was completely wrong and it does work. (don't tell anyone, but I was wrong once yesterday)
originally posted by: Halfswede
a reply to: ignorant_ape
They did fit them. Multiple captains authorized their use when Trevor was aboard. One particular captain who couldn't really deal with the "hooey" said ,"I don't believe in them, but they just work, so use them". They were used many times aboard ships of a certain major container line.
originally posted by: Halfswede
a reply to: ignorant_ape
I suspect because of the way science approaches the things it doesn't understand.