It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
noun
1.
a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human racial groups determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to dominate others or that a particular racial group is inferior to the others.
2.
a policy, system of government, etc., based upon or fostering such a doctrine; discrimination.
3.
hatred or intolerance of another race or other races.
originally posted by: beezzer
There is talk in Oregon about removing Mississippi's state flag.
In the 1970s, following the racial integration of Mississippi’s public school system and the integration of intercollegiate athletics, the prominence of the battle flag at high school and college sporting events prompted a discomfort and eventually a deep resentment among blacks in whose recent memory the flag was identified with the Ku Klux Klan, the white Citizens' Council, and various hate groups who perpetrated heinous crimes against blacks and hoisted the Rebel flag as a symbol of their belief and commitment to white supremacy.
...
The simmering public controversy over the Rebel flag exploded at the University of Mississippi in 1983 when John Hawkins, the university’s first black cheerleader, announced that he would not wave or distribute Rebel flags at Ole Miss football games. Friends and foes of the flag engaged in an ongoing public discourse on southern history and heritage, on slavery and racial suppression, on the alleged and actual causes of the Civil War.
originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: Benevolent Heretic
Can you tell me (because I'm ignorant) another time when one state started talking about removing another states' flag?
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
a reply to: network dude
www.salon.com...
Actually it was an issue last year...
In South Carolina of all places.
Although, the one defending its presence on a government building appears to be the same woman who now wants it removed...
& she is not a Liberal as far as I know.
The world is topsy turvy.
And to think, all they needed to do is shoot up a church. Well, I guess that will be the way to get things done in the future.
Lesson learned. (still don't' see the point huh?)
Is that an admittance of false flag attacks to push an agenda?
That's not like you Network
originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: Benevolent Heretic
Sadly, you continue to miss the point. The flag is a symbol. In this discussion, it's just a symbol. It's presence or lack thereof will not change anything. (a large part of the point) But the fact that a few crybabies decided to make a stink and use this tragedy as a motivational tool to get their way is the biggest part of the point that you continue to evade.
What's next? the shingles on your house? the hubcaps on your car? Heaven help us if someone oppresses you, but it's fine for others right? (you being the minority making noise)
originally posted by: network dude
I am just proud to be a part if this society. In an amazing blast of genius, "they" decided that removing the Rebel flag form existence would cure all the deep rooted issues of racism. Bravo! Just think if "they" had been this smart back in the 60's!
Now, we can put all that silliness behind us, and move forward as a people united. Somebody grab the bongos, I feel a need to sing Koom By YA!
And for some reason, my knee is sore, oh well.
And for your next week's fun and excitement, we will be removing any and all traces of cotton from the earth. (the last reminder of racism left)
originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: Krazysh0t
The parallels here are mindblowing. In the late 30's a guy named Anslinger organized a small minority and made enough noise that he was able to outlaw a common weed. But that was completely different right?
originally posted by: network dude
Sadly, you continue to miss the point. The flag is a symbol. In this discussion, it's just a symbol. It's presence or lack thereof will not change anything.
But the fact that a few crybabies decided to make a stink and use this tragedy as a motivational tool to get their way is the biggest part of the point that you continue to evade.
Heaven help us if someone oppresses you, but it's fine for others right? (you being the minority making noise)
originally posted by: MrDesolate
I'm waiting for the violent implosion and massive chaos of cognitive dissonance that will occur when someone walks into a bakery and asks for a same-sex wedding cake with a big ol' Confederate flag on it.
originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
Who's being oppressed???? I've answered your questions, now PLEASE answer that.
And I don't think the flag should be on a government building, but it doesn't bother me and I don't really care if it's there or not. It's never bothered ME. But I have the open mind to realize that it bothers a LOT of people... And as long as you and I can buy it on a flag, shirts, decals or display it on our lawn, because my government doesn't "ban" it, I'm fine with whatever happens.