It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: admirethedistance
a reply to: Rosinitiate
'Baghdad batteries' were sealed though, containing scrolls. There's no evidence that they were ever used to generate electricity, or that the Egyptians had any clue of the potential.
originally posted by: Kantzveldt
If the mineral gunk at the Southern wall sphinx temple conduit was analyzed and turned out to have been a feasible battery solution when in liquid form it would be case closed.
originally posted by: pheonix358
Suggesting that shared architectural features can date a structure is simply silly IMHO.
My house has roof tiles. They are nearly identical to roof tiles used by the roman empire.
The roman empire existed two thousand years ago. My house dates from the 1980s.
P
originally posted by: Kantzveldt
originally posted by: Harte
originally posted by: pheonix358
Suggesting that shared architectural features can date a structure is simply silly IMHO.
My house has roof tiles. They are nearly identical to roof tiles used by the roman empire.
The roman empire existed two thousand years ago. My house dates from the 1980s.
P
And the Romans used kiln-dried two-by-four pine sandwiched between sheets of gypsum board for their interior walls?
Harte
originally posted by: Blackmarketeer
Temple's suggestion that as a hidden architectural feature similar (if not identical) to those used at the other Giza temples it therefore demonstrates these temples all originated from the same time frame makes a great deal of sense. It seems a stretch to infer these channels are related to the true location of any royal tombs, in my humble opinion.
How did this astronomically based surveying work in practice? The British Egyptologist IES Edwards argued that true north was probably found by measuring the place where a particular star rose and fell in the west and east, then bisecting the angle between these two points. More recently, however, Kate Spence, an Egyptologist at the University of Cambridge, has put forward a convincing theory that the architects of the Great Pyramid sighted on two stars (b-Ursae Minoris and z-Ursae Majoris), rotating around the position of the north pole, which would have been in perfect alignment in around 2467 BC, the precise date when Khufu's pyramid is thought to have been constructed. This hypothesis is bolstered by the fact that inaccuracies in the orientations of earlier and later pyramids can be closely correlated with the degree to which the alignment of the two aforementioned stars deviates from true north.