Is Earth the Center of the Entire Universe?

One more thing - the claim that all galaxies appear to fall on concentric rings around the Earth is factually untrue. It's a lie, yet the premise of this so called 'documentary'. It's more of a 'faithumentary'!

Lying in the name of Jesus!

a reply to: admirethedistance

Look it up for yourself, do a google search on it

a reply to: pilgrimOmega

What do you mean?

originally posted by: enament
a reply to: admirethedistance

Look it up for yourself, do a google search on it

I have, and found nothing. You're the one making the bold claim, so the onus is on you to back it up.

originally posted by: MarsIsRed
I actually bothered to visit the website you originally linked to.

Bob Sungenis, executive producer of "The Principle," told CBN News why such a discovery is so upsetting to atheists...

"So if you find center in that big mass, then that means somebody had to make it that way. There's a designer behind it."

Do you not see an agenda here?

But scientists in the film admit their own theories about how the universe works don't come close to fitting with the latest data.

Which is why we do science!!! We're an inquisitive species, us humans, and we want to know about our surroundings! What's wrong with that?

Incidentally, I'm 45 and have seen scientific principles ever further refined. Rarely abandoned, except in extreme cases. Also, Pluto IS a planet of the dwarf variety - nothing much really changed there!

Lol I do see an agenda actually but I also agree he does make some compelling points, people have mentioned that if earth was the center of the universe than why is it not the center of the galaxy, well if it was it would be in the midst of a super massive black hole for one so if it were truly intelligent design you would place your prized eggs in a quiet part of a galaxy as we are at this time. i am only theorizing.

He makes no compelling points... just lies a lot!

Belief systems verses actual data are very far removed. Belief systems are about wanting something to be true. Data acquisition is about knowing something is true. There's a very big difference there...

originally posted by: admirethedistance

originally posted by: enament
a reply to: admirethedistance

Look it up for yourself, do a google search on it

I have, and found nothing. You're the one making the bold claim, so the onus is on you to back it up.

Here you are my good man,

vnnforum.com...

originally posted by: MarsIsRed
One more thing - the claim that all galaxies appear to fall on concentric rings around the Earth is factually untrue. It's a lie, yet the premise of this so called 'documentary'. It's more of a 'faithumentary'!

Lying in the name of Jesus!

Tell me what evidence you have to dismiss his argument , I want to understand your remark with a point.

originally posted by: enament

originally posted by: admirethedistance

originally posted by: enament
a reply to: admirethedistance

Look it up for yourself, do a google search on it

I have, and found nothing. You're the one making the bold claim, so the onus is on you to back it up.

Here you are my good man,

vnnforum.com...

You do know that those results were erroneous?

a reply to: MarsIsRed

His beliefs are one thing, they are indeed opinions, but whats compelling over all is the data he uses to back up his beliefs.

a reply to: MarsIsRed

Really?

The living Universe

originally posted by: enament
a reply to: MarsIsRed

His beliefs are one thing, they are indeed opinions, but whats compelling over all is the data he uses to back up his beliefs.

His "data" is misconstrued! In other words, it's made up.

a reply to: MarsIsRed

Explain in detail how you have come to that conclusion.

a reply to: MarsIsRed

And then there is this

Twitter.

click on the links below in the link

a reply to: admirethedistance

I haven't herd back from you where did you go?

originally posted by: enament
a reply to: MarsIsRed

And then there is this

Twitter.

click on the links below in the link

My point is that those 'experiments' were shown to be false - based off of bad data!

a reply to: MarsIsRed

It was only bad data in their opinions when he combined them with his personal beliefs, that's what got them all upset.

a reply to: enament

NO - it was BAD DATA - no opinions required! The data was warped by a misunderstanding of the electronics, and the path that was taken. It turned out to be relatively simple to understand!

you seem to think that opinions are important? They're not... only the data.

That fact that you question things is GOOD; everyone should. But to question facts is a bad thing - facts test us in many ways... it's a part of growing up.