It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Earth's Magnetosphere is weakening & magnetic pole shifting (Swarm data)

page: 2
43
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 23 2015 @ 02:08 AM
link   
a reply to: JRedBeard

The electric universe idea was ridiculous to begin with, and is ridiculous now. There isn't a lick of data that supports it, but there are mountains of data that support it not being correct.




posted on Jun, 23 2015 @ 05:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: admirethedistance

originally posted by: soulpowertothendegree
a reply to: theabsolutetruth

I think this has more to do with the "global warming issue" than they care to admit.

Hardly. Unless, of course, global warming is magically affecting the planet's molten core...

The Earth's magnetic field is constantly fluctuating, and the magnetic poles are always moving. We're just able to measure it better than in the past.


The field can be studied throughout time there is a record.

news.berkeley.edu...


Earth’s magnetic field could flip within a human lifetime




The discovery comes as new evidence indicates that the intensity of Earth’s magnetic field is decreasing 10 times faster than normal





“What’s incredible is that you go from reverse polarity to a field that is normal with essentially nothing in between, which means it had to have happened very quickly, probably in less than 100 years,” said Renne. “We don’t know whether the next reversal will occur as suddenly as this one did, but we also don’t know that it won’t.”



posted on Jun, 23 2015 @ 09:32 PM
link   
a reply to: admirethedistance

Enlighten me with your mountain of data on this topic.



posted on Jun, 23 2015 @ 10:45 PM
link   
Is it a co-incidence that suns magnetic field is also weakening and is at lowest its been for last 100 years.



What if the sun enters another Maunder Minimum, will we witness another Little Ice Age that occurred during the last Maunder Minimum. Too many co-incidences seem to have a common partner in crime = OUR SUN.



posted on Jun, 24 2015 @ 12:08 AM
link   
There has been a lot of volcanic eruptions over the past decade, and they seem to be on the rise..

Would I be right in saying that, or is it just that they are reported more?

If we add that and all the earthquakes over the years, would that affect the pressure on the mantle and/or outer core enough to be causing the changes we are seeing?

Once it flips, would the pressure then build back up, it flip back to where it is now and the process start all over again?


edit on 24/6/15 by woogleuk because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 24 2015 @ 04:47 AM
link   
a reply to: woogleuk

My own personal theory;

The earth's north and south pole were aligned with one side of the galaxy. We have now crossed the dark vortex in the middle of the milky way and the magnetism on that side in the opposite of the other i.e. everything is drawn in toward the dark rift.

Said dark rift is pulling at the earth's poles and at some point in the not too distant future they will have no choice but to reverse because the dark rift is exponentially more powerful than our tiny molten core. (It's that same basic principle as as passing a small magnet over a large one - it'll flip around if it's pointing the wrong way)

If said theory is correct then the further away from the dark rift we get, the more settled the earth will become after the pole shift.
edit on 24-6-2015 by markosity1973 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 24 2015 @ 06:09 AM
link   

originally posted by: markosity1973
a reply to: admirethedistance

Maybe we're getting better at finding them, or maybe, just maybe there are suddenly more coming our way.


Further to this suggestion, I just came across this;

www.express.co.uk...

I think that we really might be having more incoming asteroids - supportive of my idea of the magnetic dark rift pulling the solar system in the opposite direction as it crosses and heads away to the other side of it. Asteroids are much smaller than planets and they would be the first to be disturbed from their orbits.
edit on 24-6-2015 by markosity1973 because: (no reason given)

edit on 24-6-2015 by markosity1973 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 24 2015 @ 07:26 AM
link   
a reply to: theabsolutetruth>>> I think this might have something to do with global warming, its just lucky for us that we're going into a weak solar cycle which is having a cooling effect. Look to the sun, that's 90% of our weathers being hot or cool. Anyway, it might also be a reason for people seeming to be going a little batty right now. I've noticed that during large storm fronts and weather changes people get agitated. Storms are electromagnetic conduits, right?



posted on Jun, 24 2015 @ 12:37 PM
link   
I heard that the magnetic field strength does just vary over time and dips before a magnetic pole flip, a flip similar to what the Suns magnetic poles do every 8 years, except ours can take many hundreds of thousands of years to happen.

Some people have mentioned the galactic plane, or galactic dark rift (not sure what you mean by the latter), I thought it had been estableshed that we are nowhere near the galactic plane?

Earth didn't cross galactic plane in 2012

Edit: I don't think this has anything to do with a physical pole-shift, I'm not sure they actually happen, but I could be wrong.
edit on 24-6-2015 by Vasteel because: (no reason given)

edit on 24-6-2015 by Vasteel because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 24 2015 @ 12:43 PM
link   
a reply to: theabsolutetruth

This is kind of out there, but here goes...

Perhaps it could be linked to the Earths inner core somehow. Remember those experiments in schools where you dusted iron filaments around a magnet? Maybe the earths Iron core rotates just as the Earth does but at a slower rate.



posted on Jun, 24 2015 @ 01:24 PM
link   
a reply to: Thecakeisalie

It is linked to the Earth's outer core which is influenced by the inner core. There is research that the core is uneven, part of it being liquid whilst others solid.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

www.livescience.com...


As the Earth cools from the inside out, the molten outer core is slowly freezing. This is leading the solid inner core to grow at a rate of approximately 1 millimeter per year. However, scientists now find that the inner core might be melting at the same time. "The standard view has been that the inner core is freezing all over and growing out progressively, but it appears that there are regions where the core is actually melting," said researcher Sebastian Rost, a seismologist at the University of Leeds in England. "The net flow of heat from core to mantle ensures that there's still overall freezing of outer core material and it's still growing over time, but by no means is this a uniform process." As the Earth's interior cools, relatively hot and cold matter churns around inside the planet, a process known as convection. The roiling of material in the core, coupled with the spinning of the Earth, is what generates the planet's magnetic field.



posted on Jun, 24 2015 @ 06:52 PM
link   
I believe that the government has known this for a while. They are not searching for ET, they are looking for a new home because they know what is coming.



posted on Jun, 24 2015 @ 07:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: twentyoneawatcher
I believe that the government has known this for a while. They are not searching for ET, they are looking for a new home because they know what is coming.


We'll see. The magnetic field has weakened and flipped over and over since life started, so it's not an extinction level event by any means. OK yeah it hasn't happened during modern human times, much less high tech times. I'll be interesting to see how we'll deal with any problems the Sun could cause us due to a weaker field, if that's what we're heading for.



posted on Jun, 24 2015 @ 10:10 PM
link   
a reply to: Vasteel

When was the sun supposed to go through a more active phase, in relation to a possible earth magnetic reversal?



posted on Jun, 25 2015 @ 03:09 AM
link   
a reply to: Vasteel

Okay, so you got me there, but there are other forces that could have have the same effect I.e. a brown dwarf star hiding away somewhere nearby. It is theorised that our solar system is binary and the sun's twin is a brown dwarf - not visible through normal telescopes, only infra red. It is theorised to be on a long ecliptic orbit.



posted on Jun, 25 2015 @ 03:31 AM
link   

originally posted by: twentyoneawatcher
a reply to: Vasteel
When was the sun supposed to go through a more active phase, in relation to a possible earth magnetic reversal?

I think the Sun has high / low periods during it's 8 year cycle, with the last 'high' being in 2013 if I remember rightly. We should see hundreds if not thousands of these during an Earth magnetic flip event. I'm not sure if there is an opposite of a "Maunder minimum" in which the Sun would have a constant period of high activity. If it does then that combined with the Earth having a lower than usual magnetic field strength could increase geomagnetic activity like auroras (yay!) and also the chance of disruptions to technology like the Carrington event. Maybe.

It'll be interesting to see how we cope with a modern Carrington event, that's for sure, whatever the Earths field strength is at the time.


originally posted by: markosity1973
a reply to: Vasteel
Okay, so you got me there, but there are other forces that could have have the same effect I.e. a brown dwarf star hiding away somewhere nearby. It is theorised that our solar system is binary and the sun's twin is a brown dwarf - not visible through normal telescopes, only infra red. It is theorised to be on a long ecliptic orbit.

Heard about that. I suppose it's possible that an object orbits way out in the oort cloud, or beyond it, that we haven't seen. The theory that such an object ever comes into the inner solar system (commonly "Nibiru theory") however has been throroughly discredited via orbital mechanics, physics etc.

It also doesn't help that people who assert otherwise have cried wolf over and over, as in "It's coming in 2003...no I meant 2008...no 2009...wait It's definitely 2012...sorry I meant 2013..." and so on.
edit on 25-6-2015 by Vasteel because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 25 2015 @ 05:14 AM
link   

originally posted by: admirethedistance

originally posted by: soulpowertothendegree
a reply to: theabsolutetruth

I think this has more to do with the "global warming issue" than they care to admit.

Hardly. Unless, of course, global warming is magically affecting the planet's molten core...



Or vice versa. Wouldn't a self-regulating system, as the biosphere increasingly demonstrates itself to be, be responsive to changes, as well as part and parcel of creating those changes? Being able to record changes is not the same as understanding the processes involved in regulating those systems in relation to the whole system particularly in relation to the movement of geological time. In order to comprehend the homeostatic relationship between the biosphere, it's core and it's magnetosphere, I believe we're going to have to be altogether more open minded and engage in a greater degree of joined up, interdisciplinary, cross cultural communication than we are currently able to harness, but I think we have the capacity to start understanding how parasitic our presence, as humans, has become, from the perspective of the biosphere and start working towards integrating our behaviour in awareness of the homeostatic function.



posted on Jun, 25 2015 @ 07:34 AM
link   
a reply to: Vasteel
Yeah, the word Nibiru was running through my mind as I typed that. Nibiru is a pain to the theory because of the doomsday prophets you mention trying to put dates on it's return. They haven't found it yet, but just because we haven't yet seen it, it does not mean it does not exist.

I believe there was an infrared telescope satellite launched to look for just a thing - a brown dwarf. I don't know what happened to it though.



posted on Jun, 25 2015 @ 12:00 PM
link   
a reply to: theabsolutetruth

yes. natural cycles. which reminds me of the reply i received from a UK geophysicist around 2004 after I emailed him a question regarding catastrophe theory and rapid magnetic pole shifts....should not be like a hollywood doom porn film, still interesting nonetheless.

"In the last 30 years, Earth's icecaps have
thinned out by as much as 40 percent. Quite
inexplicably, just since 1997 the structure of the
Earth has shifted from being slightly more egg-shaped,
or elongated at the poles, to more pumpkin-shaped, or
flattened at the poles. No one at NASA has even
bothered to try to explain this yet."



posted on Jun, 26 2015 @ 02:52 AM
link   
a reply to: theabsolutetruth

Rex Jones | As climate change is blamed for the recent flooding in Texas, Rex highlights the real culprit: weather.




top topics



 
43
<< 1   >>

log in

join