It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: InverseLookingGlass
a reply to: Boadicea
BTW, I once fit 26 sorority pledges into a '78 Chevy conversion van.
originally posted by: Ericthedoubter
a reply to: Boadicea
As an atheist,I really need to add an addendum:
"None of the above may actually have occurred-This is pure hypothesis"
Other ways of asexual reproduction include parthenogenesis, fragmentation and spore formation that involves only mitosis. Parthenogenesis is the growth and development of embryo or seed without fertilization by a male. Parthenogenesis occurs naturally in some species, including lower plants (where it is called apomixis), invertebrates (e.g. water fleas, aphids, some bees and parasitic wasps), and vertebrates (e.g. some reptiles,[3] fish, and, very rarely, birds[4] and sharks[5]). It is sometimes also used to describe reproduction modes in hermaphroditic species which can self-fertilize.
originally posted by: Ericthedoubter
a reply to: Boadicea
Very well,I shall attempt some meaningful discourse despite my anti-theist leanings.
Since I am certainly not aware of all the genetic mutations and aberrations possible within the boundaries of human development,I believe that it is not impossible for a woman to give birth without a man being involved.
It isn't a very rare occurrence in the animal world -One wonders if it has happened again in human history?
originally posted by: TNMockingbird
Parthenogenesis
Still reading this article but, it appears it happens often enough in some species.
I suppose it could happen with humans...?
From Wikipedia...
Other ways of asexual reproduction include parthenogenesis, fragmentation and spore formation that involves only mitosis. Parthenogenesis is the growth and development of embryo or seed without fertilization by a male. Parthenogenesis occurs naturally in some species, including lower plants (where it is called apomixis), invertebrates (e.g. water fleas, aphids, some bees and parasitic wasps), and vertebrates (e.g. some reptiles,[3] fish, and, very rarely, birds[4] and sharks[5]). It is sometimes also used to describe reproduction modes in hermaphroditic species which can self-fertilize.
Aside from having an ambiguous-looking external genitalia, true hermaphroditism in humans differs from pseudohermaphroditism in that the person's karyotype has both XX and XY chromosome pairs (47XXY, 46XX/46XY, 46XX/47XXY or 45X/XY mosaic) and having both testicular and ovarian tissue... [snip]... Thus, testicular and ovarian tissues will both be present in the same individual.
originally posted by: Ericthedoubter
a reply to: Boadicea
If we assume that there have been roughly seven billion homo-sapiens mothers to date,isn't it possible that at least one has managed it?
originally posted by: TNMockingbird
I believe I read that there were 11 DOCUMENTED cases of hermaphrodites being fertile.
There have been 0 DOCUMENTED cases of a hermaphrodite giving birth....
NOT documented doesn't mean it couldn't have happened...