It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Reality is a Simulation

page: 9
24
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 1 2015 @ 10:24 PM
link   
originally posted by: starswift

starswift: You lost me at AUO ; )
As the creator I'm not reporting back to any body.
Einsteins theory of relativity covers that reality depends on your position within it relatively to the related bits.

The "Absolute Unbounded Oneness" is a binary information collection system that created us is all. It is not very smart OR IS A GENIUS; and our position living within its relative IDEA has not been discovered except it uses the human to explain itself to itself. Perfect.
edit on 1-7-2015 by vethumanbeing because: (no reason given)




posted on Jul, 2 2015 @ 02:57 PM
link   
The human to human part.
Simulation.
The actual part,
Unstateable as of no state.
The communication part consists of the mutually identified unstateable part.
Semantics are stateable, just questionable.
Depend on the miscommunication of the stateable parts.
This has been your reality simulation for the moment,
please have a good day,
and no stumbling while exiting.
a reply to: vethumanbeing



posted on Jul, 2 2015 @ 06:57 PM
link   
originally posted by: starswift to Veteranhumanbeing.


starswift: The human to human part.
Simulation.
The actual part,
Unstateable as of no state.

No 'state' but in status regardless, its a learning exercise and not specifically for the human; more for the AUO in usership of the human.

starswift: The communication part consists of the mutually identified unstateable part.
Semantics are stateable, just questionable.

God or (AUO) exists in silence; that is the 'motive operating'. It wants to know if we can realize a creator without it revealing itself (IT DOES do this but no one notices its brilliance) as it does so only through complex eco systems and our DNA structure (our existence). God wants us to love it unconditionally is all.


starswift: Depend on the miscommunication of the stateable parts.
This has been your reality simulation for the moment,
please have a good day, and no stumbling while exiting.

The human fumbles, confabulates, invents things both genius and (corrupt) to help our circumstance of living. The AUO is an observer is all; we HUMANIZE IT.

edit on 2-7-2015 by vethumanbeing because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 2 2015 @ 08:03 PM
link   
The human humanizes
a reply to: vethumanbeing



posted on Jul, 2 2015 @ 08:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: starswift
The human humanizes
a reply to: vethumanbeing


The Human puts that FACE upon a false God Aspect that does not exist. Although through enough 'prayer' we (MAYBE) could WISH it into existence or showing itself.
edit on 2-7-2015 by vethumanbeing because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 2 2015 @ 11:26 PM
link   
if there is no mirror
there is no reflection
a reply to: vethumanbeing



posted on Jul, 3 2015 @ 05:41 AM
link   

originally posted by: Trachel
a reply to: chr0naut

Thanks, friend!

If you've got even the faintest inclination towards the methodology, you should definitely consider researching up on a trip to explore the jungle in Peru.

Words can't describe the experience of seeing the rainbow matrixes underlying visual reality, nor can they convey the stark amazement that arises upon receiving portents from other realms.

So clearly I remember laying in the Maloka getting bombarded with information from beyond, then having a sudden insight that "when the rooster crows, the ceremony is over."

Sure enough, within several minutes the rooster crowed. Sure enough, following that occurrence my shaman got up and walked silently out the door.

My experience ended there. Yours might just be beginning.


Unfortunately, I don't think I have the physical robustness to go exploring Peru, nor the fortitude to go on the quest in a more controlled environment. I am a bit fragile, just an armchair academic, and I'll admit it.

However, a phrase you just used "rainbow matrices underlying visual reality" suddenly resonated with me!

If physical reality is, indeed a simulation, then it will be able to be detected due to the quantization, as previously mentioned, and also from anisotropy in cosmic-rays at high energies but implicit in this is that space-time itself is not continuous but is indeed a matrix, a grid of discrete size (Lattice-Gauge theory, a subset theory of Quantum Chromodynamics).

Now, in Quantum Chromodynamics, the equivalent of electrical charge is a property known as 'color' (not color as we perceive it, it is an invisible quantum property).

The odd synchronicity of the 'colored' matrices of QCD and the "rainbow matrices" you described, were like an epiphany to me.

Could you possibly have done any QCD physics which might have formed the basis of your vision? If not then, although we are talking about something invisible, it would appear that the universe is perhaps showing us under her skirts (a little) from our separate vantage points!




edit on 3/7/2015 by chr0naut because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 3 2015 @ 07:01 AM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut

I've never done any QCD physics, but rainbow energy seems prevalent throughout the multiverse. Check my other thread about it here: Angels Sparkle



posted on Jul, 3 2015 @ 05:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: starswift
if there is no mirror
there is no reflection
a reply to: veteranhumanbeing

If there is no 'clay' (carbon) the human cannot be formed, if there is no 'radiation' a spirit would never exist. The mirror is your self awareness that you exist as an individualized part of another whole.
edit on 3-7-2015 by vethumanbeing because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 3 2015 @ 05:21 PM
link   
a reply to: vethumanbeing

So...Humans are irradiated clay?



posted on Jul, 3 2015 @ 05:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: admirethedistance
a reply to: vethumanbeing

So...Humans are irradiated clay?

Why not (using simplified biblical references); its more complicated as we are no longer children given nursery stories. In my instance of birth; my mother had to be radioactive to take on my soul aspect (I would have burned her alive otherwise). Radioactive iodine; for thyroid cancer.



posted on Jul, 3 2015 @ 08:14 PM
link   
mirror no mirror
a reply to: vethumanbeing


edit on 3-7-2015 by starswift because: (no reason given)

edit on 3-7-2015 by starswift because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 3 2015 @ 08:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: starswift
mirror no mirror
a reply to: vethumanbeing


What is the reference; God is not apparent, so no reflection? I can look into my own soul; in a mirror reflected (with my eyes) and see my creator looking back at me.
edit on 3-7-2015 by vethumanbeing because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 4 2015 @ 12:17 PM
link   
no self no not self no god no not god. no not no not not.
a reply to: vethumanbeing


edit on 4-7-2015 by starswift because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 4 2015 @ 03:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: starswift
no self no not self no god no not god. no not no not not.
a reply to: veteranhumanbeing

Oh, I did not realize you were one of no faith in anything; not the individualized self or a creator. What do you think is your purpose (assuming you incarnated via a mother and father genetic line).



posted on Jul, 4 2015 @ 05:03 PM
link   

edit on 4-7-2015 by starswift because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 4 2015 @ 05:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: starswift

You were asking me my intent; just before deleting [via an edit] your reply, TELL ME MORE (what did you mean). I can answer this.
edit on 4-7-2015 by vethumanbeing because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 4 2015 @ 05:14 PM
link   
eh ; )
No, I said it depends on your intent.
Unfortunately if you explain as you have in this thread I probably will not agree with the logic.
Just my reaction.
a reply to: vethumanbeing


edit on 4-7-2015 by starswift because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 4 2015 @ 05:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: starswift
eh ; )
No, I said it depends on your intent.
Unfortunately if you explain as you have in this thread I probably will not agree with the logic.
Just my reaction.
a reply to: vethumanbeing

What do you think my intent could be; are you second guessing me? Tell me more.



posted on Jul, 4 2015 @ 07:47 PM
link   
One question, are you doing artificial intelligence research?
Because my simulated answer will change as a result.
a reply to: vethumanbeing


edit on 4-7-2015 by starswift because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
24
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join